643 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19279155)
1. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M
J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of contralateral pure tone stimulation on distortion emissions suggests a frequency-specific functioning of the efferent cochlear control.
Althen H; Wittekindt A; Gaese B; Kössl M; Abel C
J Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 107(7):1962-9. PubMed ID: 22262828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the quadratic distortion product f2-f1 in humans.
Wittekindt A; Gaese BH; Kössl M
Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 18951964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Age-related declines in distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing pure tone contralateral stimulation in CBA/CaJ mice.
Varghese GI; Zhu X; Frisina RD
Hear Res; 2005 Nov; 209(1-2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16061336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensitive response to low-frequency cochlear distortion products in the auditory midbrain.
Abel C; Kössl M
J Neurophysiol; 2009 Mar; 101(3):1560-74. PubMed ID: 19036870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Contralateral suppression of latency during distortion product otoacoustic emissions detection in guinea pigs].
Kong W; Yang Y; Zhang W
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12761994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: effect of the primary frequency in Dpgrams.
Zhang F; Boettcher FA; Sun XM
Int J Audiol; 2007 Apr; 46(4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17454232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli.
Purcell DW; Butler BE; Saunders TJ; Allen P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2133-48. PubMed ID: 19062854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of occupational noise on pure-tone threshold and distortion product otoacoustic emissions after one workday.
Müller J; Janssen T
Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 246(1-2):9-22. PubMed ID: 18848612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The acoustic two-tone distortions 2f1-f2 and f2-f1 and their possible relation to changes in the operating point of the cochlear amplifier.
Frank G; Kössl M
Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 98(1-2):104-15. PubMed ID: 8880185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Amplitude modulation of DPOAEs by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
Harrison RV; Sharma A; Brown T; Jiwani S; James AL
Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 128(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 18368574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Olivocochlear reflex effect on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions is largest at frequencies with distinct fine structure dips.
Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Müller J; Janssen T; Zenner HP
Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):83-92. PubMed ID: 17137736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
Kossowski M; Mom T; Guitton M; Poncet JL; Bonfils P; Avan P
Audiology; 2001; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contralateral noise has possible asymmetric frequency-sensitive effect on the 2F1-F2 otoacoustic emission in humans.
Atcherson SR; Martin MJ; Lintvedt R
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jun; 438(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 18472335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efferent-induced change in human cochlear compression and its influence on masking of tones.
Bhagat SP; Carter PH
Neurosci Lett; 2010 Nov; 485(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 20813158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on cochlear tuning measured using stimulus frequency and distortion product OAEs.
Boothalingam S; Lineton B
Int J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 51(12):892-9. PubMed ID: 22934932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dependence of the DPOAE amplitude pattern on acoustical biasing of the cochlear partition.
Lukashkin AN; Russell IJ
Hear Res; 2005 May; 203(1-2):45-53. PubMed ID: 15855029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the frequency selectivity of contralateral acoustic stimulation on the active mechanisms of the organ of corti by analyzing the changes in the amplitude of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion products.
Ibargüen AM; Santaolalla Montoya F; del Rey AS; Fernandez JM
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 19128576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Contralateral modification of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions].
Ganz M; von Specht H; Kevanishvili Z
Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 May; 76(5):278-83. PubMed ID: 9280414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure is responsible for variability of distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression.
Sun XM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4310-20. PubMed ID: 18537382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
