These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19279366)

  • 1. Validation of developmental assessment tool for Anganwadis (DATA).
    Nair MK; Russell PS; Rekha RS; Lakshmi MA; Latha S; Rajee K
    Indian Pediatr; 2009 Jan; 46 Suppl():s27-36. PubMed ID: 19279366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and normative validation of Developmental Assessment Tool for Anganwadis for 3- to 4-year-old children (DATA-II).
    Nair MK; Russell PS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 23177891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maltreated infants and toddlers: predictors of developmental delay.
    Scarborough AA; Lloyd EC; Barth RP
    J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2009 Dec; 30(6):489-98. PubMed ID: 19898247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A continuous-scale measure of child development for population-based epidemiological surveys: a preliminary study using Item Response Theory for the Denver Test.
    Drachler Mde L; Marshall T; de Carvalho Leite JC
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 21(2):138-53. PubMed ID: 17302643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of a preschool developmental assessment scale for assessment of developmental disabilities.
    Leung C; Mak R; Lau V; Cheung J; Lam C
    Res Dev Disabil; 2010; 31(6):1358-65. PubMed ID: 20702061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening test battery for assessment of psychosocial development.
    Vazir S; Naidu AN; Vidyasagar P; Lansdown RG; Reddy V
    Indian Pediatr; 1994 Dec; 31(12):1465-75. PubMed ID: 7533142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Standardization of the Kent Infant Development Scale: implications for primary care pediatricians].
    García-Tornel Florensa S; Ruiz España A; Reuter J; Clow C; Reuter L
    An Esp Pediatr; 1997 Feb; 46(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 9157808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of four statistical approaches to score child development: a study of Malawian children.
    Cheung YB; Gladstone M; Maleta K; Duan X; Ashorn P
    Trop Med Int Health; 2008 Aug; 13(8):987-93. PubMed ID: 18554248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can Western developmental screening tools be modified for use in a rural Malawian setting?
    Gladstone MJ; Lancaster GA; Jones AP; Maleta K; Mtitimila E; Ashorn P; Smyth RL
    Arch Dis Child; 2008 Jan; 93(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 17379661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Concurrent validity of the Early Intervention Developmental Profile and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-2.
    Maring JR; Elbaum L
    Pediatr Phys Ther; 2007; 19(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 17505288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PEDS: developmental milestones--an accurate brief tool for surveillance and screening.
    Brothers KB; Glascoe FP; Robertshaw NS
    Clin Pediatr (Phila); 2008 Apr; 47(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 18057141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developmental delay--identification and management.
    Oberklaid F; Efron D
    Aust Fam Physician; 2005 Sep; 34(9):739-42. PubMed ID: 16184205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A validation study of the Norwegian version of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires.
    Richter J; Janson H
    Acta Paediatr; 2007 May; 96(5):748-52. PubMed ID: 17462065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can parents accurately screen children at risk of developmental delay?
    Dixon G; Badawi N; French D; Kurinczuk JJ
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2009 May; 45(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 19493118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A developmental screening tool for toddlers with multiple domains based on Rasch analysis.
    Hwang AW; Chou YT; Hsieh CL; Hsieh WS; Liao HF; Wong AM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2015 Jan; 114(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 25127503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of high-risk newborns ? a follow-up study from birth to one year.
    Elenjickal MG; Thomas K; Sushamabai S; Ahamed SK
    Indian Pediatr; 2009 Apr; 46(4):342-5. PubMed ID: 19213986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The quick and easy Mongolian Rapid Baby Scale shows good concurrent validity and sensitivity.
    Dagvadorj A; Takehara K; Bavuusuren B; Morisaki N; Gochoo S; Mori R
    Acta Paediatr; 2015 Mar; 104(3):e94-9. PubMed ID: 25443770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Role of parents evaluation of developmental status in detecting developmental delay in young children.
    Malhi P; Singhi P
    Indian Pediatr; 2002 Mar; 39(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 11910137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Movement Assessment of Children (MAC): validity, reliability, stability and sensitivity to change in typically developing children.
    Chandler LS; Terhorst L; Rogers JC; Holm MB
    Child Care Health Dev; 2016 Jul; 42(4):513-20. PubMed ID: 27196946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of the Daily Activities of Infants Scale: a measure supporting early motor development.
    Bartlett DJ; Fanning JK; Miller L; Conti-Becker A; Doralp S
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2008 Aug; 50(8):613-7. PubMed ID: 18754900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.