These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19280193)

  • 1. Value of multidetector computed tomography evaluation of myocardial perfusion in the assessment of ischemic heart disease: comparison with nuclear perfusion imaging.
    Kachenoura N; Lodato JA; Gaspar T; Bardo DM; Newby B; Gips S; Peled N; Lang RM; Mor-Avi V
    Eur Radiol; 2009 Aug; 19(8):1897-905. PubMed ID: 19280193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Volumetric quantification of myocardial perfusion using analysis of multi-detector computed tomography 3D datasets: comparison with nuclear perfusion imaging.
    Kachenoura N; Veronesi F; Lodato JA; Corsi C; Mehta R; Newby B; Lang RM; Mor-Avi V
    Eur Radiol; 2010 Feb; 20(2):337-47. PubMed ID: 19711083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of spiral multidetector CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging in the noninvasive detection of functionally relevant coronary artery lesions: first clinical experiences.
    Hacker M; Jakobs T; Matthiesen F; Vollmar C; Nikolaou K; Becker C; Knez A; Pfluger T; Reiser M; Hahn K; Tiling R
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Aug; 46(8):1294-300. PubMed ID: 16085585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ischemic burden assessment of myocardial perfusion CT, compared with SPECT using semi-quantitative and quantitative approaches.
    Kwon O; Hwang HJ; Koo HJ; Yang DH; Kang HJ; Kim JA; Moon DH; Kim HS; Kang JW; Kim YH
    Int J Cardiol; 2019 Mar; 278():287-294. PubMed ID: 30587418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with second-generation dual-source CT: comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Wang Y; Qin L; Shi X; Zeng Y; Jing H; Schoepf UJ; Jin Z
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Mar; 198(3):521-9. PubMed ID: 22357991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resting cardiac 64-MDCT does not reliably detect myocardial ischemia identified by radionuclide imaging.
    Spiro AJ; Haramati LB; Jain VR; Godelman A; Travin MI; Levsky JM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Feb; 200(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 23345355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative Analysis of Iodine Image of Dual-energy Computed Tomography at Rest: Comparison With 99mTc-Tetrofosmin Stress-rest Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging as the Reference Standard.
    Nakahara T; Toyama T; Jinzaki M; Seki R; Saito Y; Higuchi T; Yamada M; Arai M; Tsushima Y; Kuribayashi S; Kurabayashi M
    J Thorac Imaging; 2018 Mar; 33(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 28622166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic impact of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in patients with major extracardiac findings by computed tomography for attenuation correction.
    Zadro C; Roussel N; Cassol E; Pascal P; Petermann A; Meyrignac O; Jaffro M; Fournier P; Cournot M; Galinier M; Carrié D; Rousseau H; Berry I; Lairez O
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1574-1583. PubMed ID: 28281088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of appropriate use on the prognostic value of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Doukky R; Hayes K; Frogge N; Balakrishnan G; Dontaraju VS; Rangel MO; Golzar Y; Garcia-Sayan E; Hendel RC
    Circulation; 2013 Oct; 128(15):1634-43. PubMed ID: 24021779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the extent and severity of myocardial perfusion defects measured by CT coronary angiography and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Tamarappoo BK; Dey D; Nakazato R; Shmilovich H; Smith T; Cheng VY; Thomson LE; Hayes SW; Friedman JD; Germano G; Slomka PJ; Berman DS
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Oct; 3(10):1010-9. PubMed ID: 20947046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Invasive versus noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease.
    Schuijf JD; van Werkhoven JM; Pundziute G; Jukema JW; Decramer I; Stokkel MP; Dibbets-Schneider P; Schalij MJ; Reiber JH; van der Wall EE; Wijns W; Bax JJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Mar; 1(2):190-9. PubMed ID: 19356428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined assessment of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion using multidetector computed tomography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease.
    Kachenoura N; Gaspar T; Lodato JA; Bardo DM; Newby B; Gips S; Peled N; Lang RM; Mor-Avi V
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 Jun; 103(11):1487-94. PubMed ID: 19463504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Myocardial perfusion in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: comparison between 320-MDCT and rubidium-82 PET.
    Dantas RN; Assuncao AN; Marques IA; Fahel MG; Nomura CH; Avila LFR; Giorgi MCP; Soares J; Meneghetti JC; Parga JR
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2665-2674. PubMed ID: 29352381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integrated assessment of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion using a retractable SPECT camera combined with 64-slice CT: initial experience.
    Thilo C; Schoepf UJ; Gordon L; Chiaramida S; Serguson J; Costello P
    Eur Radiol; 2009 Apr; 19(4):845-56. PubMed ID: 18972115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional imaging in the assessment of myocardial infarction: MR imaging vs. MDCT vs. SPECT.
    Mahnken AH; Bruners P; Stanzel S; Koos R; Mühlenbruch G; Günther RW; Reinartz P
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):480-5. PubMed ID: 18650043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stress and rest dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by evaluation of complete time-attenuation curves with dual-source CT.
    Ho KT; Chua KC; Klotz E; Panknin C
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Aug; 3(8):811-20. PubMed ID: 20705260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The predictive value of Cardiodynamicsgram in myocardial perfusion abnormalities.
    Dong X; Zhang J; Lai H; Tang M; Ou S; Dou J; Wang C
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208859. PubMed ID: 30557346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CAD detection in patients with intermediate-high pre-test probability: low-dose CT delayed enhancement detects ischemic myocardial scar with moderate accuracy but does not improve performance of a stress-rest CT perfusion protocol.
    Bettencourt N; Ferreira ND; Leite D; Carvalho M; Ferreira WDS; Schuster A; Chiribiri A; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Nagel E; Gama V
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 24011773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Directions and magnitudes of misregistration of CT attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion studies: incidence, impact on image quality, and guidance for reregistration.
    Kennedy JA; Israel O; Frenkel A
    J Nucl Med; 2009 Sep; 50(9):1471-8. PubMed ID: 19690038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive 64-row Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography (CCTA) Compared with Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI): The PICTURE Study, A Prospective Multicenter Trial.
    Budoff MJ; Li D; Kazerooni EA; Thomas GS; Mieres JH; Shaw LJ
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 27771227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.