254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19280806)
1. Computed tomography grading systems poorly predict the need for intervention after spleen and liver injuries.
Cohn SM; Arango JI; Myers JG; Lopez PP; Jonas RB; Waite LL; Corneille MG; Stewart RM; Dent DL
Am Surg; 2009 Feb; 75(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 19280806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Only moderate intra- and inter-observer agreement between radiologists and surgeons when grading blunt paediatric hepatic injury on CT scan.
Nellensteijn DR; ten Duis HJ; Oldenziel J; Polak WG; Hulscher JB
Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Dec; 19(6):392-4. PubMed ID: 19899038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hepatic and splenic blush on computed tomography in children following blunt abdominal trauma: Is intervention necessary?
Ingram MC; Siddharthan RV; Morris AD; Hill SJ; Travers CD; McKracken CE; Heiss KF; Raval MV; Santore MT
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2016 Aug; 81(2):266-70. PubMed ID: 27257698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. "Blush at first sight": significance of computed tomographic and angiographic discrepancy in patients with blunt abdominal trauma.
Alarhayem AQ; Myers JG; Dent D; Lamus D; Lopera J; Liao L; Cestero R; Stewart R; Eastridge BJ
Am J Surg; 2015 Dec; 210(6):1104-10; discussion 1110-1. PubMed ID: 26456683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of injury grading systems for patients with blunt splenic trauma.
Olthof DC; van der Vlies CH; Scheerder MJ; de Haan RJ; Beenen LF; Goslings JC; van Delden OM
Injury; 2014 Jan; 45(1):146-50. PubMed ID: 23000055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the revised 2018 AAST-OIS classification and the CT severity index for prediction of operative management and survival in patients with blunt spleen and liver injuries.
Morell-Hofert D; Primavesi F; Fodor M; Gassner E; Kranebitter V; Braunwarth E; Haselbacher M; Nitsche UP; Schmid S; Blauth M; Öfner D; Stättner S
Eur Radiol; 2020 Dec; 30(12):6570-6581. PubMed ID: 32696255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of gray-scale contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with contrast-enhanced computed tomography in different grading of blunt hepatic and splenic trauma: an animal experiment.
Tang J; Li W; Lv F; Zhang H; Zhang L; Wang Y; Li J; Yang L
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 35(4):566-75. PubMed ID: 19097681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Concomitant hollow viscus injuries in patients with blunt hepatic and splenic injuries: an analysis of a National Trauma Registry database.
Swaid F; Peleg K; Alfici R; Matter I; Olsha O; Ashkenazi I; Givon A; ; Kessel B
Injury; 2014 Sep; 45(9):1409-12. PubMed ID: 24656303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of repeat computerized tomography in nonoperative management of solid organ trauma.
Sharma OP; Oswanski MF; Singer D
Am Surg; 2005 Mar; 71(3):244-9. PubMed ID: 15869142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CT detection of hepatic and splenic injuries: usefulness of liver window settings.
Patten RM; Gunberg SR; Brandenburger DK; Richardson ML
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1107-10. PubMed ID: 11000174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inter- and intrarater reliability in computed axial tomographic grading of splenic injury: why so many grading scales?
Barquist ES; Pizano LR; Feuer W; Pappas PA; McKenney KA; LeBlang SD; Henry RP; Rivas LA; Cohn SM
J Trauma; 2004 Feb; 56(2):334-8. PubMed ID: 14960976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in splenic size after abdominal trauma.
Goodman LR; Aprahamian C
Radiology; 1990 Sep; 176(3):629-32. PubMed ID: 2389017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Significance of minimal or no intraperitoneal fluid visible on CT scan associated with blunt liver and splenic injuries: a multicenter analysis.
Ochsner MG; Knudson MM; Pachter HL; Hoyt DB; Cogbill TH; McAuley CE; Davis FE; Rogers S; Guth A; Garcia J; Lambert P; Thomson N; Evans S; Balthazar EJ; Casola G; Nigogosyan MA; Barr R
J Trauma; 2000 Sep; 49(3):505-10. PubMed ID: 11003330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Blunt splenic injury in adults: clinical and CT criteria for management, with emphasis on active extravasation.
Federle MP; Courcoulas AP; Powell M; Ferris JV; Peitzman AB
Radiology; 1998 Jan; 206(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 9423663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Proximal splenic angioembolization does not improve outcomes in treating blunt splenic injuries compared with splenectomy: a cohort analysis.
Duchesne JC; Simmons JD; Schmieg RE; McSwain NE; Bellows CF
J Trauma; 2008 Dec; 65(6):1346-51; discussion 1351-3. PubMed ID: 19077625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimization of selection for nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: comparison of MDCT grading systems.
Marmery H; Shanmuganathan K; Alexander MT; Mirvis SE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Dec; 189(6):1421-7. PubMed ID: 18029880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-operative management of isolated solid organ injuries due to blunt abdominal trauma in children: a fifteen-year experience.
Ozturk H; Dokucu AI; Onen A; Otçu S; Gedik S; Azal OF
Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2004 Feb; 14(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 15024676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of abdominal trauma by computed tomography.
Federle MP; Goldberg HI; Kaiser JA; Moss AA; Jeffrey RB; Mall JC
Radiology; 1981 Mar; 138(3):637-44. PubMed ID: 6450962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hepatic and splenic injury in children: role of CT in the decision for laparotomy.
Brick SH; Taylor GA; Potter BM; Eichelberger MR
Radiology; 1987 Dec; 165(3):643-6. PubMed ID: 3685344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Blunt hepatic and splenic trauma: indications for conservative treatment based on computerized tomography].
Frola C; Casiglia M; Cantoni S; Loria F; Leoni C
Radiol Med; 1993 Dec; 86(6):833-40. PubMed ID: 8296004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
