123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1928118)
1. ACGIH TLVs: a critical analysis of the documentation.
Breysse PA
Am J Ind Med; 1991; 20(3):423-30. PubMed ID: 1928118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. But they are not thresholds: a critical analysis of the documentation of Threshold Limit Values.
Roach SA; Rappaport SM
Am J Ind Med; 1990; 17(6):727-53. PubMed ID: 2188503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. TLVs for asbestos.
Cook WA
Am J Ind Med; 1992; 21(5):765-6. PubMed ID: 1308657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A quantitative analysis of factors affecting PELs and TLVs for carcinogens.
Smith JS; Mendeloff JM
Risk Anal; 1999 Dec; 19(6):1223-34. PubMed ID: 10765459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is there an acceptable level of asbestos use?
van Dorn A
Lancet Respir Med; 2019 Feb; 7(2):112-113. PubMed ID: 30660509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Re: "TLVs for asbestos".
Schepers GW
Am J Ind Med; 1993 Jun; 23(6):967-9. PubMed ID: 8328481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Re: "TLVs for asbestos".
Coles GV
Am J Ind Med; 1993 Jun; 23(6):955-7. PubMed ID: 8328479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. New approach set to protect workers from asbestos exposures below PELs.
Borak J; Russi M
Occup Health Saf; 1995 Feb; 64(2):39-40. PubMed ID: 7870404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Working with asbestos in Brazil.
Rangé J
Int J Occup Environ Health; 1998; 4(1):56-8. PubMed ID: 10036365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Time to reconsider TLVs.
Djerassi L
Am J Ind Med; 1988; 13(5):611-2. PubMed ID: 3376953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comment on "Implications of OSHA's reliance on TLVs in developing the air contaminants standard" by Robinson et al.
Saric M
Am J Ind Med; 1991; 19(6):815-7. PubMed ID: 1882859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [The introducibility of the Italian regulation of TLVs: the viewpoint of a judge].
Colato O
G Ital Med Lav; 1990; 12(5-6):213-5. PubMed ID: 2152618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. New asbestos regulations require immediate action.
Healthc Hazard Mater Manage; 1994 Sep; 7(12):1-3, 5-6. PubMed ID: 10137350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Third wave of asbestos-related disease from secondary use of asbestos. A case report from industry.
Weiner R; Rees D; Lunga FJ; Felix MA
S Afr Med J; 1994 Mar; 84(3):158-60. PubMed ID: 7740353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. OSHA's final rule on asbestos cuts permissible exposure in half.
Okleshen W
Health Facil Manage; 1995 Jan; 8(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 10139314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of threshold limit values in U.S. air pollution policy.
Robinson JC; Paxman DG
Am J Ind Med; 1992; 21(3):383-96. PubMed ID: 1585949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Skin notation in the context of workplace exposure standards.
Scansetti G; Piolatto G; Rubino GF
Am J Ind Med; 1988; 14(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 2976578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of temperature and pressure on airborne exposure concentrations when performing compliance evaluations using ACGIH TLVs and OSHA PELs.
Stephenson DJ; Lillquist DR
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Apr; 16(4):482-6. PubMed ID: 11318391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Corporate influence on threshold limit values.
Castleman BI; Ziem GE
Am J Ind Med; 1988; 13(5):531-59. PubMed ID: 3287906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complex mixtures in industrial workspaces: lessons for indoor air quality evaluations.
Lippy BE; Turner RW
Environ Health Perspect; 1991 Nov; 95():81-3. PubMed ID: 1821384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
