509 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19281502)
1. Effect of repeated torque/mechanical loading cycles on two different abutment types in implants with internal tapered connections: an in vitro study.
Ricciardi Coppedê A; de Mattos Mda G; Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):624-32. PubMed ID: 19281502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of mechanical loading on the removal torque of different types of tapered connection abutments for dental implants.
Pintinha M; Camarini ET; Sábio S; Pereira JR
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):383-8. PubMed ID: 24070863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic fatigue resistance of implant-abutment junction in an internally notched morse-taper oral implant: influence of abutment design.
Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Sahin S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 15248881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Removal torques of conical, tapered implant abutments: the effects of anodization and reduction of surface area.
Squier RS; Psoter WJ; Taylor TD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 11858571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the ITI Morse taper implant/abutment design with an internal modification.
Ding TA; Woody RD; Higginbottom FL; Miller BH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):865-72. PubMed ID: 14696662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Torque removal evaluation of prosthetic screws after tightening and loosening cycles: an in vitro study.
Cardoso M; Torres MF; Lourenço EJ; de Moraes Telles D; Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):475-80. PubMed ID: 21457352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.
Seetoh YL; Tan KB; Chua EK; Quek HC; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):797-806. PubMed ID: 21841990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vitro analysis of implant screw torque loss with external hex and internal connection implant systems.
Piermatti J; Yousef H; Luke A; Mahevich R; Weiner S
Implant Dent; 2006 Dec; 15(4):427-35. PubMed ID: 17172962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implant-abutment interface design affects fatigue and fracture strength of implants.
Steinebrunner L; Wolfart S; Ludwig K; Kern M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1276-84. PubMed ID: 19040443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Axial displacement of abutments into implants and implant replicas, with the tapered cone-screw internal connection, as a function of tightening torque.
Dailey B; Jordan L; Blind O; Tavernier B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 19492640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture resistance of the implant-abutment connection in implants with internal hex and internal conical connections under oblique compressive loading: an in vitro study.
Coppedê AR; Bersani E; de Mattos Mda G; Rodrigues RC; Sartori IA; Ribeiro RF
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 19548411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variation in the total lengths of abutment/implant assemblies generated with a function of applied tightening torque in external and internal implant-abutment connection.
Kim KS; Lim YJ; Kim MJ; Kwon HB; Yang JH; Lee JB; Yim SH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):834-9. PubMed ID: 21198900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screw loosening with interchangeable abutments in internally connected implants after cyclic loading.
Kim SK; Koak JY; Heo SJ; Taylor TD; Ryoo S; Lee SY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 22299077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abutment rotational displacement of external hexagon implant system under lateral cyclic loading.
Khraisat A; Baqain ZH; Smadi L; Nomura S; Miyakawa O; Elnasser Z
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 16774595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Critical bending moment of implant-abutment screw joint interfaces: effect of torque levels and implant diameter.
Tan BF; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):648-58. PubMed ID: 15508980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The dynamic natures of implant loading.
Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of repeated closures on opening torque values in seven abutment-implant systems.
Weiss EI; Kozak D; Gross MD
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Aug; 84(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 10946337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
