These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19281628)

  • 1. Impact of policy-induced structural change on milk quality: evidence from the Flemish dairy sector.
    Van der Straeten B; Buysse J; Van Huylenbroeck G; Lauwers L
    J Dairy Res; 2009 May; 76(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 19281628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of the introduction of automatic milking systems on milk quality.
    Klungel GH; Slaghuis BA; Hogeveen H
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 Sep; 83(9):1998-2003. PubMed ID: 11003229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Process audits versus product quality monitoring of bulk milk.
    Velthuis AG; van Asseldonk MA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jan; 94(1):235-49. PubMed ID: 21183034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of bulk-tank standard plate count and somatic cell count for Wisconsin dairy farms in three size categories.
    Ingham SC; Hu Y; Ané C
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Aug; 94(8):4237-41. PubMed ID: 21787961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short communication: Evaluation of bulk tank milk microbiological quality of nine dairy farms in Tennessee.
    Gillespie BE; Lewis MJ; Boonyayatra S; Maxwell ML; Saxton A; Oliver SP; Almeida RA
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Aug; 95(8):4275-9. PubMed ID: 22818441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microbiological quality and related factors of sheep milk produced in farms of NE Greece.
    Alexopoulos A; Tzatzimakis G; Bezirtzoglou E; Plessas S; Stavropoulou E; Sinapis E; Abas Z
    Anaerobe; 2011 Dec; 17(6):276-9. PubMed ID: 21521656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Total bacterial count in raw milk from the dairy farms that characterize the zone northwest of Santa Fe and south of Santiago del Estero].
    Revelli GR; Sbodio OA; Tercero EJ
    Rev Argent Microbiol; 2004; 36(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 15559198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short communication: Correlation of on-site inspection and laboratory milk testing results for Wisconsin grade A dairy farms in 2007 and 2008.
    Ingham S; VanHove W; Jeutong R; Adamson C; Battaglia R; Leitzke T
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Sep; 93(9):3957-60. PubMed ID: 20723669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of certification in the Milk and Dairy Beef Quality Assurance Program and associated factors on the risk of having violative antibiotic residues in milk from dairy farms in Michigan.
    Gibbons-Burgener SN; Kaneene JB; Lloyd JW; Erskine RJ
    Am J Vet Res; 1999 Oct; 60(10):1312-6. PubMed ID: 10791947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of the bulk milk somatic cell count as an indication of average herd somatic cell count.
    Lievaart J; Barkema HW; Hogeveen H; Kremer W
    J Dairy Res; 2009 Nov; 76(4):490-6. PubMed ID: 19758478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between somatic cell count, polymorphonuclear leucocyte count and quality parameters in bovine bulk tank milk.
    Wickström E; Persson-Waller K; Lindmark-Månsson H; Ostensson K; Sternesjö A
    J Dairy Res; 2009 May; 76(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 19281626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Costs of mastitis: facts and perception.
    Huijps K; Lam TJ; Hogeveen H
    J Dairy Res; 2008 Feb; 75(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 18226298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Haptoglobin and serum amyloid A in bulk tank milk in relation to raw milk quality.
    Akerstedt M; Waller KP; Sternesjö A
    J Dairy Res; 2009 Nov; 76(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 19758476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An operational method for the evaluation of resource use and environmental impacts of dairy farms by life cycle assessment.
    van der Werf HM; Kanyarushoki C; Corson MS
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Aug; 90(11):3643-52. PubMed ID: 19664872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Farm technical efficiency under a tradable milk quota system.
    Areal FJ; Tiffin R; Balcombe K
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jan; 95(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 22192183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microbiological and chemical quality of raw milk in New York State.
    Boor KJ; Brown DP; Murphy SC; Kozlowski SM; Bandler DK
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Jun; 81(6):1743-8. PubMed ID: 9684182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk-based audit selection of dairy farms.
    van Asseldonk MA; Velthuis AG
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Feb; 97(2):592-7. PubMed ID: 24290823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of animal selection on milk composition and processability.
    Glantz M; Månsson HL; Stålhammar H; Bårström LO; Fröjelin M; Knutsson A; Teluk C; Paulsson M
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Sep; 92(9):4589-603. PubMed ID: 19700722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The environmental impact of dairy production: 1944 compared with 2007.
    Capper JL; Cady RA; Bauman DE
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jun; 87(6):2160-7. PubMed ID: 19286817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of targeted selective treatments in sheep in Italy: effects on faecal worm egg count and milk production in four case studies.
    Cringoli G; Rinaldi L; Veneziano V; Mezzino L; Vercruysse J; Jackson F
    Vet Parasitol; 2009 Sep; 164(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 19411140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.