These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19281723)

  • 1. Accuracy assessments of quantitative diagnostic tests for clinical research.
    Atiqi R; van Iersel C; Cleophas TJ
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2009 Mar; 47(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 19281723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validating diagnostic tests, correct and incorrect methods, new developments.
    Cleophas TJ; Droogendijk J; van Ouwerkerk BM
    Curr Clin Pharmacol; 2008 May; 3(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 18690881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What you need to know about statistics, part II: reliability of diagnostic and screening tests.
    Zidan M; Thomas RL; Slovis TL
    Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Mar; 45(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 25726014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving validation methods for molecular diagnostics: application of Bland-Altman, Deming and simple linear regression analyses in assay comparison and evaluation for next-generation sequencing.
    Misyura M; Sukhai MA; Kulasignam V; Zhang T; Kamel-Reid S; Stockley TL
    J Clin Pathol; 2018 Feb; 71(2):117-124. PubMed ID: 28747393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The assessment of biological maturation for talent selection - which method can be used?].
    Müller L; Müller E; Hildebrandt C; Kapelari K; Raschner C
    Sportverletz Sportschaden; 2015 Mar; 29(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 25710395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. cp-R, an interface the R programming language for clinical laboratory method comparisons.
    Holmes DT
    Clin Biochem; 2015 Feb; 48(3):192-5. PubMed ID: 25448032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity of linear regression in method comparison studies: is it limited by the statistical model or the quality of the analytical input data?
    Stöckl D; Dewitte K; Thienpont LM
    Clin Chem; 1998 Nov; 44(11):2340-6. PubMed ID: 9799762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Clinical use of diagnostic tests (Part 1): Analysis of the properties of a diagnostic test].
    Cerda L J; Cifuentes A L
    Rev Chilena Infectol; 2010 Jun; 27(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 20737121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-dimensional predictive equation to classify visceral obesity in clinical practice.
    Garaulet M; Hernández-Morante JJ; Tébar FJ; Zamora S; Canteras M
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2006 Jul; 14(7):1181-91. PubMed ID: 16899799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Basic principles on selection and use of diagnostic tests: properties of diagnostic tests.
    Carneiro AV
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1267-74. PubMed ID: 11865687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal linear combination of biomarkers for multi-category diagnosis.
    Hsu MJ; Chen YH
    Stat Med; 2016 Jan; 35(2):202-13. PubMed ID: 26250879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biostatistics Series Module 6: Correlation and Linear Regression.
    Hazra A; Gogtay N
    Indian J Dermatol; 2016; 61(6):593-601. PubMed ID: 27904175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy and cost comparison in medical testing using sequential testing strategies.
    Ahmed AE; McClish DK; Schubert CM
    Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(29):3416-30. PubMed ID: 21976377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information: a systematic review.
    Loy CT; Irwig L
    JAMA; 2004 Oct; 292(13):1602-9. PubMed ID: 15467063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy of the Triage D-dimer test for exclusion of venous thromboembolism in outpatients.
    Ghys T; Achtergael W; Verschraegen I; Leus B; Jochmans K
    Thromb Res; 2008; 121(6):735-41. PubMed ID: 17888501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies without a gold standard.
    Liu Y; Chen Y; Chu H
    Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):538-47. PubMed ID: 25358907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A mixed effect model for bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies using a copula representation of the random effects distribution.
    Nikoloulopoulos AK
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(29):3842-65. PubMed ID: 26234584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evaluation of added value of diagnostic tests].
    Moons KG; van der Graaf Y
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(26):1256-61. PubMed ID: 10908955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three approaches to regression analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous test results.
    Pepe MS
    Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9544511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.