These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19282967)

  • 1. Intrinsic disorder in protein interactions: insights from a comprehensive structural analysis.
    Fong JH; Shoemaker BA; Garbuzynskiy SO; Lobanov MY; Galzitskaya OV; Panchenko AR
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Mar; 5(3):e1000316. PubMed ID: 19282967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analyzing molecular interactions.
    Petsko GA
    Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2003 May; Chapter 8():Unit8.1. PubMed ID: 18428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Local structural disorder imparts plasticity on linear motifs.
    Fuxreiter M; Tompa P; Simon I
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Apr; 23(8):950-6. PubMed ID: 17387114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interaction-site prediction for protein complexes: a critical assessment.
    Zhou HX; Qin S
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(17):2203-9. PubMed ID: 17586545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Secondary structure based analysis and classification of biological interfaces: identification of binding motifs in protein-protein interactions.
    Guharoy M; Chakrabarti P
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Aug; 23(15):1909-18. PubMed ID: 17510165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protein-protein interactions.
    Alexov E
    Curr Pharm Biotechnol; 2008 Apr; 9(2):55-6. PubMed ID: 18393861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Protein complexes: structure prediction challenges for the 21st century.
    Aloy P; Pichaud M; Russell RB
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2005 Feb; 15(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 15718128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization and prediction of protein interfaces to infer protein-protein interaction networks.
    Keskin O; Tuncbag N; Gursoy A
    Curr Pharm Biotechnol; 2008 Apr; 9(2):67-76. PubMed ID: 18393863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting 3D structures of protein-protein complexes.
    Vakser IA; Kundrotas P
    Curr Pharm Biotechnol; 2008 Apr; 9(2):57-66. PubMed ID: 18393862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ISIS: interaction sites identified from sequence.
    Ofran Y; Rost B
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(2):e13-6. PubMed ID: 17237081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A simple shape characteristic of protein-protein recognition.
    Nicola G; Vakser IA
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Apr; 23(7):789-92. PubMed ID: 17267427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uncovering the structural basis of protein interactions with efficient clustering of 3-D interaction interfaces.
    Aung Z; Tan SH; Ng SK; Tan KL
    Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf; 2007; 6():287-97. PubMed ID: 17951832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The modular organization of domain structures: insights into protein-protein binding.
    del Sol A; Carbonell P
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2007 Dec; 3(12):e239. PubMed ID: 18069884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Natively unstructured regions in proteins identified from contact predictions.
    Schlessinger A; Punta M; Rost B
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(18):2376-84. PubMed ID: 17709338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accurate prediction of peptide binding sites on protein surfaces.
    Petsalaki E; Stark A; García-Urdiales E; Russell RB
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Mar; 5(3):e1000335. PubMed ID: 19325869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 3D complex: a structural classification of protein complexes.
    Levy ED; Pereira-Leal JB; Chothia C; Teichmann SA
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2006 Nov; 2(11):e155. PubMed ID: 17112313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recognition-induced conformational changes in protein-protein docking.
    Lensink MF; Méndez R
    Curr Pharm Biotechnol; 2008 Apr; 9(2):77-86. PubMed ID: 18393864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intrinsically disordered proteins display no preference for chaperone binding in vivo.
    Hegyi H; Tompa P
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):e1000017. PubMed ID: 18369417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An integrative approach for predicting interactions of protein regions.
    Schelhorn SE; Lengauer T; Albrecht M
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(16):i35-41. PubMed ID: 18689837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DOCKGROUND resource for studying protein-protein interfaces.
    Douguet D; Chen HC; Tovchigrechko A; Vakser IA
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Nov; 22(21):2612-8. PubMed ID: 16928732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.