These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

858 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19283747)

  • 1. Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery.
    Gurusamy KS; Gluud C; Nikolova D; Davidson BR
    Br J Surg; 2009 Apr; 96(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 19283747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Blinded trials taken to the test: an analysis of randomized clinical trials that report tests for the success of blinding.
    Hróbjartsson A; Forfang E; Haahr MT; Als-Nielsen B; Brorson S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 36(3):654-63. PubMed ID: 17440024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The importance of preservation of the ethical principle of equipoise in the design of clinical trials: relative impact of the methodological quality domains on the treatment effect in randomized controlled trials.
    Djulbegovic B; Cantor A; Clarke M
    Account Res; 2003; 10(4):301-15. PubMed ID: 14989285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bias in surgical research.
    Paradis C
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 18650626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the validity of clinical trials.
    Akobeng AK
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2008 Sep; 47(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18728521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of bias in methodology for randomized controlled trials published on implant dentistry.
    Dumbrigue HB; Al-Bayat MI; Ng CC; Wakefield CW
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 16827739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Redefining the randomized controlled trial in the context of acupuncture research.
    Walji R; Boon H
    Complement Ther Clin Pract; 2006 May; 12(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 16648085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trial sequential analyses of meta-analyses of complications in laparoscopic vs. small-incision cholecystectomy: more randomized patients are needed.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 20004553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The design and assessment of prospective randomised, controlled trials in orthopaedic surgery.
    Boutron I; Ravaud P; Nizard R
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jul; 89(7):858-63. PubMed ID: 17673575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical issues in interpreting clinical trials.
    DeMets DL
    J Intern Med; 2004 May; 255(5):529-37. PubMed ID: 15078496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evidence-based clinical practice].
    Gluud C
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2002 Dec; 24(6):541-7. PubMed ID: 12905675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bias in clinical intervention research.
    Gluud LL
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 163(6):493-501. PubMed ID: 16443796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.
    Pildal J; Hróbjartsson A; Jørgensen KJ; Hilden J; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):847-57. PubMed ID: 17517809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ensuring the comparability of comparison groups: is randomization enough?
    Berger VW; Weinstein S
    Control Clin Trials; 2004 Oct; 25(5):515-24. PubMed ID: 15465620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evidence-based surgery].
    Stijntjes F; Obertop H
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Sep; 152(38):2065-70. PubMed ID: 18837182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Who is blinded in randomized clinical trials? A study of 200 trials and a survey of authors.
    Haahr MT; Hróbjartsson A
    Clin Trials; 2006; 3(4):360-5. PubMed ID: 17060210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The number, content, and quality of randomized controlled trials in the prevention and care of injuries.
    Stelfox HT; Goverman J
    J Trauma; 2008 Dec; 65(6):1488-93. PubMed ID: 19077647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of meta-analysis in monitoring clinical trials.
    Begg CB
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1299-306; discussion 1307-11. PubMed ID: 8817803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.