These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19284036)
41. Comparison of a Salmonella enteritidis-specific polymerase chain reaction assay to delayed secondary enrichment culture for the detection of Salmonella enteritidis in environmental drag swab samples. Charlton BR; Walker RL; Kinde BH; Bauer CR; Channing-Santiago SE; Farver TB Avian Dis; 2005 Sep; 49(3):418-22. PubMed ID: 16252498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Associations Between the Level of Biosecurity and Occurrence of Dermanyssus gallinae and Salmonella spp. in Layer Farms. Sylejmani D; Musliu A; Ramadani N; Sparagano O; Hamidi A Avian Dis; 2016 Jun; 60(2):454-9. PubMed ID: 27309287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Prevalence of and examination of exposure factors for Salmonella on commercial egg-laying farms in Barbados. Aimey V; Hunte K; Whitehall P; Sanford B; Trotman M; Delgado A; Lefrancois T; Shaw J; Hernandez J Prev Vet Med; 2013 Jul; 110(3-4):489-96. PubMed ID: 23357068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Sources of Salmonellae in broiler chickens in Ontario. Hacking WC; Mitchell WR; Carlson HC Can J Comp Med; 1978 Oct; 42(4):392-9. PubMed ID: 743597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Evaluation of a rapid cultural method for identification of salmonellas in naturally contaminated veterinary samples. Davies RH; Wray C J Appl Bacteriol; 1994 Sep; 77(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 7989248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The prevalence and PCR detection of Salmonella contamination in raw poultry. Whyte P; Mc Gill K; Collins JD; Gormley E Vet Microbiol; 2002 Oct; 89(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 12223162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Inhibitory effect of used litter on salmonella typhimurium transmission in the chicken. Olesiuk OM; Snoeyenbos GH; Smyser CF Avian Dis; 1971; 15(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 5547750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Bacteriological and serological diagnosis of salmonellosis of fowls. Smith PJ; Larkin M; Brooksbank NH Res Vet Sci; 1972 Sep; 13(5):460-7. PubMed ID: 4635118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. An evaluation of the microantiglobulin test in monitoring experimental Salmonella group C infections in chickens. Thain JA Res Vet Sci; 1980 Mar; 28(2):212-6. PubMed ID: 7414067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A comparison of culturing drag swabs and litter for identification of infections with Salmonella spp. in commercial chicken flocks. Kingston DJ Avian Dis; 1981; 25(2):513-6. PubMed ID: 7259686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Investigation of risk factors for Salmonella on commercial egg-laying farms in Great Britain, 2004-2005. Snow LC; Davies RH; Christiansen KH; Carrique-Mas JJ; Cook AJ; Evans SJ Vet Rec; 2010 May; 166(19):579-86. PubMed ID: 20453235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A comparison between longitudinal shedding patterns of Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Dublin on dairy farms. Kirchner M; McLaren I; Clifton-Hadley FA; Liebana E; Wales AD; Davies RH Vet Rec; 2012 Aug; 171(8):194. PubMed ID: 22859413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A review of the official sampling of flocks of laying hens in the Salmonella National Control Programme in Great Britain. Gosling RJ; Martelli F; Sayers R; Larkin L; Davies RH Br Poult Sci; 2014; 55(5):569-75. PubMed ID: 25350727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Direct immunofluorescent technique in diagnosis of experimental salmonellosis of turkeys. Bahl AK; Kumar MC; York MD; Pomeroy BS Avian Dis; 1975; 19(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 1091255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Sources of Salmonella contamination during broiler production in Eastern Spain. Marin C; Balasch S; Vega S; Lainez M Prev Vet Med; 2011 Jan; 98(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 21035883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparative studies of diagnostic bacteriological methods for the recovery of Salmonella from faecal samples from flocks of layers. Braun C; Kostka V; Balks E; Redmann T; Helmuth R Zentralbl Veterinarmed B; 1998 May; 45(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 9640105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. E-nose identification of Salmonella enterica in poultry manure. Kizil Ü; Genç L; Genç TT; Rahman S; Khaitsa ML Br Poult Sci; 2015 Apr; 56(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 25650129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The effect of exposure, storage times, and types of holding media on the drag-swab monitoring technique for Salmonella. Opara OO; Mallinson ET; Tate CR; Carr LE; Miller RG; Stewart L; Kelleher C; Johnston RW; Joseph SW Avian Dis; 1992; 36(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 1567312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Frequency of isolation of Salmonella from protective foot covers worn in broiler houses as compared to drag-swab sampling. Caldwell DJ; Hargis BM; Corrier DE; DeLoach JR Avian Dis; 1998; 42(2):381-4. PubMed ID: 9645330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Observations related to the Salmonella EU layer baseline survey in the United Kingdom: follow-up of positive flocks and sensitivity issues. Carrique-Mas JJ; Breslin M; Snow L; Arnold ME; Wales A; McLaren I; Davies RH Epidemiol Infect; 2008 Nov; 136(11):1537-46. PubMed ID: 18177519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]