These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19284069)

  • 21. Clinical validation of the new T- and Y-shape models for the quantitative analysis of coronary bifurcations: an interobserver variability study.
    Tuinenburg JC; Janssen JP; Kooistra R; Koning G; Corral MD; Lansky AJ; Reiber JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 May; 81(6):E225-36. PubMed ID: 22707289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Aspiration thrombectomy and intracoronary tirofiban via GuideLiner
    Fry J; Naqvi A; Bahia A; Seto A
    Future Cardiol; 2017 Mar; 13(2):131-135. PubMed ID: 28169555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison between two- and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography bifurcation analyses for the assessment of bifurcation lesions: A subanalysis of the TRYTON pivotal IDE coronary bifurcation trial.
    Muramatsu T; Grundeken MJ; Ishibashi Y; Nakatani S; Girasis C; Campos CM; Morel MA; Jonker H; de Winter RJ; Wykrzykowska JJ; García-García HM; Leon MB; Serruys PW; Onuma Y;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Sep; 86(3):E140-9. PubMed ID: 25914327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count: a fast computer model to quantify the functional significance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries.
    Tu S; Barbato E; Köszegi Z; Yang J; Sun Z; Holm NR; Tar B; Li Y; Rusinaru D; Wijns W; Reiber JH
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 7(7):768-77. PubMed ID: 25060020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of QCA systems.
    Dietz U; Rupprecht HJ; Brennecke R; Fritsch HP; Woltmann J; Blankenberg S; Meyer J
    Int J Card Imaging; 1997 Aug; 13(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 9306141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of the ratio of coronary arterial lumen volume to left ventricle myocardial mass derived from coronary CT angiography on fractional flow reserve.
    Taylor CA; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Achenbach S; Berman DS; Jensen JM; Dey D; Bøtker HE; Kim HJ; Khem S; Wilk A; Zarins CK; Bezerra H; Lesser J; Ko B; Narula J; Ahmadi A; Øvrehus KA; St Goar F; De Bruyne B; Nørgaard BL
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017 Nov; 11(6):429-436. PubMed ID: 28789941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of visual assessment of coronary stenosis with independent quantitative coronary angiography: Findings from the Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) trial.
    Shah R; Yow E; Jones WS; Kohl LP; Kosinski AS; Hoffmann U; Lee KL; Fordyce CB; Mark DB; Lowe A; Douglas PS; Patel MR
    Am Heart J; 2017 Feb; 184():1-9. PubMed ID: 27892881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Adaptive edge localisation approach for quantitative coronary analysis.
    Al-Fahoum AS
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2003 Jul; 41(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 12892365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Diagnostic accuracy in coronary stenosis: comparison between visual score and quantitative analysis (quantitative computed tomographic angiography) in coronary angiography by multidetector computed tomography-coronary angiography and quantitative analysis (quantitative coronary angiography) in conventional coronary angiography.
    Malagò R; D'Onofrio M; Tavella D; Mantovani W; Brunelli S; Pezzato A; Caliari G; Nicolì L; Benussi P; Mucelli RP
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(5):652-9. PubMed ID: 20861765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of lossy data compression on quantitative coronary measurements.
    Koning G; Béretta P; Zwart P; Hekking E; Reiber JH
    Int J Card Imaging; 1997 Aug; 13(4):261-70. PubMed ID: 9306140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of vasoreactivity using videodensitometry coronary angiography.
    Molloi S; Berenji GR; Dang TT; Kassab G
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2003 Aug; 19(4):271-9. PubMed ID: 14598895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy and reproducibility of fast fractional flow reserve computation from invasive coronary angiography.
    van Rosendael AR; Koning G; Dimitriu-Leen AC; Smit JM; Montero-Cabezas JM; van der Kley F; Jukema JW; Reiber JHC; Bax JJ; Scholte AJHA
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1305-1312. PubMed ID: 28642995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validation by high-frequency epicardial echocardiography of a new method of analyzing coronary angiography quantitatively in coronary artery disease.
    McPherson DD; Johnson MR; Collins SM; Kieso RA; Marcus ML; Kerber RE
    Am J Cardiol; 1993 Jan; 71(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 8420232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Diagnostic performance of quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography and quantitative coronary angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of intermediate-grade stenoses.
    Ghekiere O; Dewilde W; Bellekens M; Hoa D; Couvreur T; Djekic J; Coolen T; Mancini I; Vanhoenacker PK; Dendale P; Nchimi A
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1651-61. PubMed ID: 26323355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of angiographic center and local site analysis of PTCA results in a multicenter angioplasty-restenosis trial. The M Heart Group.
    Martinelli MJ; Deutsch E; Ferraro A; Bove AA
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1992 Sep; 27(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 1525816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In vivo validation of an experimental adaptive quantitative coronary angiography algorithm to circumvent overestimation of small luminal diameters.
    Keane D; Gronenschild E; Slager C; Ozaki Y; Haase J; Serruys PW
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1995 Sep; 36(1):17-24; discussion 25-6. PubMed ID: 7489588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. CT Angiography for the Prediction of Hemodynamic Significance in Intermediate and Severe Lesions: Head-to-Head Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography Using Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard.
    Budoff MJ; Nakazato R; Mancini GB; Gransar H; Leipsic J; Berman DS; Min JK
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 9(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 26897669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sources of error in quantitative coronary angiography.
    Herrington DM; Siebes M; Walford GD
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1993 Aug; 29(4):314-21. PubMed ID: 8221856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An angiographic tool based on Visual estimation for Risk prEdiction of Side branch OccLusion in coronary bifurcation interVEntion: the V-RESOLVE score system.
    Dou K; Zhang D; Xu B; Yang Y; Yin D; Qiao S; Wu Y; You S; Wang Y; Yan R; Gao R; Kirtane AJ
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Apr; 11(14):e1604-11. PubMed ID: 27056121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of monochromatic coronary computed tomography angiography from single-source dual-energy CT on coronary stenosis quantification.
    Stehli J; Clerc OF; Fuchs TA; Possner M; Gräni C; Benz DC; Buechel RR; Kaufmann PA
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 26754621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.