136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19284636)
1. Missing call bias in high-throughput genotyping.
Fu W; Wang Y; Wang Y; Li R; Lin R; Jin L
BMC Genomics; 2009 Mar; 10():106. PubMed ID: 19284636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of pooled genotyping on the Affymetrix 500 k and SNP6.0 genotyping platforms using the polynomial-based probe-specific correction.
Anantharaman R; Chew FT
BMC Genet; 2009 Dec; 10():82. PubMed ID: 20003400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating genotyping error rates from Mendelian errors in SNP array genotypes and their impact on inference.
Saunders IW; Brohede J; Hannan GN
Genomics; 2007 Sep; 90(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 17587543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Discovery of novel variants in genotyping arrays improves genotype retention and reduces ascertainment bias.
Didion JP; Yang H; Sheppard K; Fu CP; McMillan L; de Villena FP; Churchill GA
BMC Genomics; 2012 Jan; 13():34. PubMed ID: 22260749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Strategies for processing and quality control of Illumina genotyping arrays.
Zhao S; Jing W; Samuels DC; Sheng Q; Shyr Y; Guo Y
Brief Bioinform; 2018 Sep; 19(5):765-775. PubMed ID: 28334151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of missing and erroneous genotypes on tagging SNP selection and power of subsequent association tests.
Liu W; Zhao W; Chase GA
Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 16557026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tradeoff between no-call reduction in genotyping error rate and loss of sample size for genetic case/control association studies.
Kang SJ; Gordon D; Brown AM; Ott J; Finch SJ
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2004; ():116-27. PubMed ID: 14992497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The cost effectiveness of duplicate genotyping for testing genetic association.
Tintle N; Gordon D; Van Bruggen D; Finch S
Ann Hum Genet; 2009 May; 73(Pt 3):370-8. PubMed ID: 19344449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing batch effects of genotype calling algorithm BRLMM for the Affymetrix GeneChip Human Mapping 500 K array set using 270 HapMap samples.
Hong H; Su Z; Ge W; Shi L; Perkins R; Fang H; Xu J; Chen JJ; Han T; Kaput J; Fuscoe JC; Tong W
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 9 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S17. PubMed ID: 18793462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. OpenADAM: an open source genome-wide association data management system for Affymetrix SNP arrays.
Yeung JM; Sham PC; Chan AS; Cherny SS
BMC Genomics; 2008 Dec; 9():636. PubMed ID: 19117518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low-depth genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) in a bovine population: strategies to maximize the selection of high quality genotypes and the accuracy of imputation.
Brouard JS; Boyle B; Ibeagha-Awemu EM; Bissonnette N
BMC Genet; 2017 Apr; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 28381212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genotyping-by-sequencing and SNP-arrays are complementary for detecting quantitative trait loci by tagging different haplotypes in association studies.
Negro SS; Millet EJ; Madur D; Bauland C; Combes V; Welcker C; Tardieu F; Charcosset A; Nicolas SD
BMC Plant Biol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):318. PubMed ID: 31311506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Technical reproducibility of genotyping SNP arrays used in genome-wide association studies.
Hong H; Xu L; Liu J; Jones WD; Su Z; Ning B; Perkins R; Ge W; Miclaus K; Zhang L; Park K; Green B; Han T; Fang H; Lambert CG; Vega SC; Lin SM; Jafari N; Czika W; Wolfinger RD; Goodsaid F; Tong W; Shi L
PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e44483. PubMed ID: 22970228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A multi-array multi-SNP genotyping algorithm for Affymetrix SNP microarrays.
Xiao Y; Segal MR; Yang YH; Yeh RF
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jun; 23(12):1459-67. PubMed ID: 17459966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimates of array and pool-construction variance for planning efficient DNA-pooling genome wide association studies.
Earp MA; Rahmani M; Chew K; Brooks-Wilson A
BMC Med Genomics; 2011 Nov; 4():81. PubMed ID: 22122996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between call rate per individual and genotyping accuracy of bovine single-nucleotide polymorphism array using deoxyribonucleic acid of various qualities.
Sasaki S; Yoshinari K; Uchiyama K; Takeda M; Kojima T
Anim Sci J; 2018 Nov; 89(11):1533-1539. PubMed ID: 30230122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incorporating duplicate genotype data into linear trend tests of genetic association: methods and cost-effectiveness.
Borchers B; Brown M; McLellan B; Bekmetjev A; Tintle NL
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8(1):Article24. PubMed ID: 19492982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the impact of differential genotyping errors on rare variant tests of association.
Mayer-Jochimsen M; Fast S; Tintle NL
PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e56626. PubMed ID: 23472072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genotyping errors, pedigree errors, and missing data.
Hinrichs AL; Suarez BK
Genet Epidemiol; 2005; 29 Suppl 1():S120-4. PubMed ID: 16342180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic model based algorithms for screening and genotyping over 100 K SNPs on oligonucleotide microarrays.
Di X; Matsuzaki H; Webster TA; Hubbell E; Liu G; Dong S; Bartell D; Huang J; Chiles R; Yang G; Shen MM; Kulp D; Kennedy GC; Mei R; Jones KW; Cawley S
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1958-63. PubMed ID: 15657097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
