These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19284690)

  • 1. A mating method accounting for inbreeding and multi-trait selection in dairy cattle populations.
    Colleau JJ; Tual K; de Preaumont H; Regaldo D
    Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Jan; 41(1):7. PubMed ID: 19284690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A mating advice system in dairy cattle incorporating genomic information.
    Carthy TR; McCarthy J; Berry DP
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):8210-8220. PubMed ID: 31229287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of gene editing versus conventional breeding to introgress the POLLED allele into the US dairy cattle population.
    Mueller ML; Cole JB; Sonstegard TS; Van Eenennaam AL
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 May; 102(5):4215-4226. PubMed ID: 30852022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mating structures for genomic selection breeding programs in aquaculture.
    Sonesson AK; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):46. PubMed ID: 27342705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Novel strategies to minimize progeny inbreeding while maximizing genetic gain using genomic information.
    Pryce JE; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jan; 95(1):377-88. PubMed ID: 22192217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic response and inbreeding with different selection methods and mating designs for nucleus breeding programs of dairy cattle.
    Leitch HW; Smith C; Burnside EB; Quinton M
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Jun; 77(6):1702-18. PubMed ID: 8083430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Controlling inbreeding by constraining the average relationship between parents of young bulls entering AI progeny test programs.
    Weigel KA; Lin SW
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Sep; 85(9):2376-83. PubMed ID: 12362471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of sire mating patterns on future genetic merit and inbreeding in a closed beef cattle population.
    Oyama K; Nojima M; Shojo M; Fukushima M; Anada K; Mukai F
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Apr; 124(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 17488357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analyzing the effect of different approaches of penalized relationship in multistage selection schemes.
    Hinrichs D; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(11):3426-32. PubMed ID: 21705631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Major advances in globalization and consolidation of the artificial insemination industry.
    Funk DA
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Apr; 89(4):1362-8. PubMed ID: 16537967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing genetic gain, inbreeding, and bias attributable to different flock genetic means in alternative sheep sire referencing schemes.
    Kuehn LA; Notter DR; Lewis RM
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(3):526-35. PubMed ID: 18073281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reintroducing genetic diversity in populations from cryopreserved material: the case of Abondance, a French local dairy cattle breed.
    Jacques A; Leroy G; Rognon X; Verrier E; Tixier-Boichard M; Restoux G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Apr; 55(1):28. PubMed ID: 37076793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genotyping more cows increases genetic gain and reduces rate of true inbreeding in a dairy cattle breeding scheme using female reproductive technologies.
    Thomasen JR; Liu H; Sørensen AC
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jan; 103(1):597-606. PubMed ID: 31733861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Controlling inbreeding and maximizing genetic gain using semi-definite programming with pedigree-based and genomic relationships.
    Schierenbeck S; Pimentel EC; Tietze M; Körte J; Reents R; Reinhardt F; Simianer H; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Dec; 94(12):6143-52. PubMed ID: 22118102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
    Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
    Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved dairy cattle mating plans at herd level using genomic information.
    Bérodier M; Berg P; Meuwissen T; Boichard D; Brochard M; Ducrocq V
    Animal; 2021 Jan; 15(1):100016. PubMed ID: 33516018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental selection for calving ease and postnatal growth in seven cattle populations. I. Changes in estimated breeding values.
    Bennett GL
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Sep; 86(9):2093-102. PubMed ID: 18441073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimized diffusion of buck semen for saving genetic variability in selected dairy goat populations.
    Colleau JJ; Clément V; Martin P; Palhière I
    BMC Genet; 2011 Feb; 12():25. PubMed ID: 21306617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of computerized mate selection programs to control inbreeding of Holstein and Jersey cattle in the next generation.
    Weigel KA; Lin SW
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 Apr; 83(4):822-8. PubMed ID: 10791799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.