These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19285375)

  • 1. Velocity variability in ultrasonic Doppler examinations.
    Hadlock J; Beach KW;
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 35(6):949-54. PubMed ID: 19285375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Blood flow velocity measurements for carotid stenosis estimation: interobserver variation and interequipment variability.
    Ranke C; Trappe HJ
    Vasa; 1997 Aug; 26(3):210-4. PubMed ID: 9286154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of carotid artery blood velocity measurements by vector and standard Doppler approaches.
    Tortoli P; Lenge M; Righi D; Ciuti G; Liebgott H; Ricci S
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 May; 41(5):1354-62. PubMed ID: 25722028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimizing duplex follow-up in patients with an asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis of less than 60%.
    Lovelace TD; Moneta GL; Abou-Zamzam AM; Edwards JM; Yeager RA; Landry GJ; Taylor LM; Porter JM
    J Vasc Surg; 2001 Jan; 33(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 11137924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variability of Doppler US measurements along the common carotid artery: effects on estimates of internal carotid arterial stenosis in patients with angiographically proved disease.
    Lee VS; Hertzberg BS; Workman MJ; Smith TP; Kliewer MA; DeLong DM; Carroll BA
    Radiology; 2000 Feb; 214(2):387-92. PubMed ID: 10671585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Carotid artery stent type influences duplex ultrasonography derived peak systolic velocity: findings of an in-vitro model.
    Spies C; Doshi R; Spoon J; Snell RJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Aug; 70(2):309-15. PubMed ID: 17630677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive ability of duplex ultrasonography for internal carotid artery stenosis of 70%-99%: a comparative study.
    Chen JC; Salvian AJ; Taylor DC; Teal PA; Marotta TR; Hsiang YN
    Ann Vasc Surg; 1998 May; 12(3):244-7. PubMed ID: 9588510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intraoperative use of a new angle-independent Doppler system to measure arterial velocities after carotid endarterectomy.
    Rasmussen TE; Panneton JM; Kalra M; Hofer JM; Lewis BD; Rowland CM; Bower TC; Cherry KJ; Noel AA; Gloviczki P
    J Vasc Surg; 2003 Feb; 37(2):374-80. PubMed ID: 12563209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The importance of Doppler angle of insonation on differentiation between 50-69% and 70-99% carotid artery stenosis.
    Logason K; Bärlin T; Jonsson ML; Boström A; Hårdemark HG; Karacagil S
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2001 Apr; 21(4):311-3. PubMed ID: 11359330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery.
    Lal BK; Hobson RW; Tofighi B; Kapadia I; Cuadra S; Jamil Z
    J Vasc Surg; 2008 Jan; 47(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 18178455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Duplex scan surveillance after carotid angioplasty and stenting: a rational definition of stent stenosis.
    Armstrong PA; Bandyk DF; Johnson BL; Shames ML; Zwiebel BR; Back MR
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Sep; 46(3):460-5; discussion 465-6. PubMed ID: 17681713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Redefined duplex ultrasonographic criteria for diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis.
    Huston J; James EM; Brown RD; Lefsrud RD; Ilstrup DM; Robertson EF; Meyer FB; Hallett JW
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2000 Nov; 75(11):1133-40. PubMed ID: 11075742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interobserver variability of carotid Doppler peak velocity measurements among technologists in an ICAVL-accredited vascular laboratory.
    Corriveau MM; Johnston KW
    J Vasc Surg; 2004 Apr; 39(4):735-41. PubMed ID: 15071434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Doppler Velocity Estimates of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis: Angle Correction Parallel to the Color Doppler Lumen Versus Parallel to the Artery Wall.
    Polak JF; Alessi-Chinetti JM; Kremkau FW
    J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Dec; 38(12):3211-3218. PubMed ID: 31124163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standardized ultrasound evaluation of carotid stenosis for clinical trials: University of Washington Ultrasound Reading Center.
    Beach KW; Bergelin RO; Leotta DF; Primozich JF; Sevareid PM; Stutzman ET; Zierler RE
    Cardiovasc Ultrasound; 2010 Sep; 8():39. PubMed ID: 20822530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Center specific duplex Doppler threshold values in carotid artery stenosis].
    Yurdakul M; Tola M; Ozdemir E; Işiksalan Ozbülbül N; Cumhur T
    Tani Girisim Radyol; 2004 Jun; 10(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 15236136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gender differences in blood velocities across carotid stenoses.
    Comerota AJ; Salles-Cunha SX; Daoud Y; Jones L; Beebe HG
    J Vasc Surg; 2004 Nov; 40(5):939-44. PubMed ID: 15557908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection and quantification of carotid artery stenosis: efficacy of various Doppler velocity parameters.
    Hunink MG; Polak JF; Barlan MM; O'Leary DH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):619-25. PubMed ID: 8430567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noninvasive assessment of flow velocity and flow velocity reserve in the right gastroepiploic artery graft by transcutaneous Doppler echocardiography: comparison with an invasive technique.
    Yagi T; Yamamuro A; Akasaka T; Yamabe K; Tamita K; Katayama M; Nagai K; Tani T; Tanabe K; Morioka S; Nasu M; Okada Y
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2003 Sep; 16(9):975-81. PubMed ID: 12931110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemodynamic conditions at the carotid bifurcation during protective common carotid occlusion.
    Ouriel K; Greenberg RK; Sarac TP
    J Vasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 34(4):577-80. PubMed ID: 11668307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.