1066 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19286211)
1. Prospectively packaged ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: the disseminative pattern of lymph node metastasis.
Zhu Y; Zhang SL; Ye DW; Yao XD; Dai B; Zhang HL; Shen YJ; Zhu YP; Shi GH; Ma CG
J Urol; 2009 May; 181(5):2103-8. PubMed ID: 19286211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is the node of Cloquet the sentinel node for the iliac/obturator node group?
Shen P; Conforti AM; Essner R; Cochran AJ; Turner RR; Morton DL
Cancer J; 2000; 6(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11069226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of penile cancer.
Protzel C; Alcaraz A; Horenblas S; Pizzocaro G; Zlotta A; Hakenberg OW
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1075-88. PubMed ID: 19264390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term followup of penile carcinoma with high risk for lymph node invasion treated with inguinal lymphadenectomy.
Marconnet L; Rigaud J; Bouchot O
J Urol; 2010 Jun; 183(6):2227-32. PubMed ID: 20399455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radical cystectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy: survival of patients with lymph node metastasis above the bifurcation of the common iliac vessels treated with surgery only.
Steven K; Poulsen AL
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1218-23; discussion 1223-4. PubMed ID: 17698113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extended lymphadenectomy in penile cancer.
Pompeo AC
Can J Urol; 2005 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():30-6; discussion 97-8. PubMed ID: 15780162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Management of the lymph nodes in penile cancer.
Heyns CF; Fleshner N; Sangar V; Schlenker B; Yuvaraja TB; van Poppel H
Urology; 2010 Aug; 76(2 Suppl 1):S43-57. PubMed ID: 20691885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lymphatic and vascular embolizations are independent predictive variables of inguinal lymph node involvement in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: Gruppo Uro-Oncologico del Nord Est (Northeast Uro-Oncological Group) Penile Cancer data base data.
Ficarra V; Zattoni F; Cunico SC; Galetti TP; Luciani L; Fandella A; Guazzieri S; Maruzzi D; Sava T; Siracusano S; Pilloni S; Tasca A; Martignoni G; Gardiman M; Tardanico R; Zambolin T; Cisternino A; Artibani W;
Cancer; 2005 Jun; 103(12):2507-16. PubMed ID: 15856474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pelvic lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma: extent of inguinal lymph node involvement as an indicator for pelvic lymph node involvement and survival.
Lont AP; Kroon BK; Gallee MP; van Tinteren H; Moonen LM; Horenblas S
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):947-52; discussion 952. PubMed ID: 17296384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anatomical mapping of lymphatic drainage in penile carcinoma with SPECT-CT: implications for the extent of inguinal lymph node dissection.
Leijte JA; Valdés Olmos RA; Nieweg OE; Horenblas S
Eur Urol; 2008 Oct; 54(4):885-90. PubMed ID: 18502024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic significance of extranodal extension in patients with pathological node positive penile carcinoma.
Graafland NM; van Boven HH; van Werkhoven E; Moonen LM; Horenblas S
J Urol; 2010 Oct; 184(4):1347-53. PubMed ID: 20723934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. p53 as a new prognostic factor for lymph node metastasis in penile carcinoma: analysis of 82 patients treated with amputation and bilateral lymphadenectomy.
Lopes A; Bezerra AL; Pinto CA; Serrano SV; de MellO CA; Villa LL
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 12050497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis.
Heidenreich A; Varga Z; Von Knobloch R
J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1681-6. PubMed ID: 11912387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morbidity of inguinal lymphadenectomy for invasive penile carcinoma.
Bouchot O; Rigaud J; Maillet F; Hetet JF; Karam G
Eur Urol; 2004 Jun; 45(6):761-5; discussion 765-6. PubMed ID: 15149749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accurate staging of carcinoma of the penis in men with nonpalpable inguinal lymph nodes by modified inguinal lymphadenectomy.
Parra RO
J Urol; 1996 Feb; 155(2):560-3. PubMed ID: 8558660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The risks of lymph node metastasis and the prognostic factors in carcinoma of the penis: analysis of 50 patients treated with bilateral ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy.
Leewansangtong S; Srinualnad S; Chaiyaprasithi B; Taweemonkongsap T; Soontrapa S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Feb; 84(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 11336079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unreliability of modified inguinal lymphadenectomy for clinical staging of penile carcinoma.
Lopes A; Rossi BM; Fonseca FP; Morini S
Cancer; 1996 May; 77(10):2099-102. PubMed ID: 8640676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modified radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the penis: technique and results.
Jacobellis U
J Urol; 2003 Apr; 169(4):1349-52. PubMed ID: 12629358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Carcinoma of the penis. What to do with the regional lymph nodes?].
Virseda Rodríguez JA; Salinas Sánchez A; Hernández Millan I
Arch Esp Urol; 1994 May; 47(4):349-62. PubMed ID: 8053721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Controversies in ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy.
Hegarty PK; Dinney CP; Pettaway CA
Urol Clin North Am; 2010 Aug; 37(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 20674697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
