BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

466 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19286303)

  • 1. Editorial comment on: Insignificant prostate cancer and active surveillance: from definition to clinical implications.
    Aus G
    Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1331. PubMed ID: 19286303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Editorial comment on: Insignificant prostate cancer and active surveillance: from definition to clinical implications.
    Albertson PC
    Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1331-2. PubMed ID: 19286304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Active surveillance for prostate cancer: has the time finally come?
    Aragon-Ching JB
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Jun; 28(16):e265-6; author reply e267. PubMed ID: 20406916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What percentage of patients with newly diagnosed carcinoma of the prostate are candidates for surveillance? An analysis of the CaPSURE database.
    Barocas DA; Cowan JE; Smith JA; Carroll PR;
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1330-4; discussion 1334-5. PubMed ID: 18707731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes following active surveillance of men with localized prostate cancer diagnosed in the prostate specific antigen era.
    Ercole B; Marietti SR; Fine J; Albertsen PC
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1336-9; discussion 1340-1. PubMed ID: 18707696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Insignificant prostate cancer and active surveillance: from definition to clinical implications.
    Bastian PJ; Carter BH; Bjartell A; Seitz M; Stanislaus P; Montorsi F; Stief CG; Schröder F
    Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1321-30. PubMed ID: 19286302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The prostate specific antigen. Its use as a tumor marker for prostate cancer.
    Kantoff PW; Talcott JA
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1994 Jun; 8(3):555-72. PubMed ID: 8707772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Editorial comment on: predictive factors for progression in patients with clinical stage T1a prostate cancer in the PSA era.
    Joniau S
    Eur Urol; 2008 Feb; 53(2):362. PubMed ID: 17611018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Editorial comment on: predictive factors for progression in patients with clinical stage T1a prostate cancer in the PSA era.
    Scattoni V
    Eur Urol; 2008 Feb; 53(2):361. PubMed ID: 17611014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Active surveillance in young patients with prostate cancer: the unanswered question.
    Campodonico F; Maffezzini M
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 May; 28(13):e211; author reply e212. PubMed ID: 20368544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treatment of stage A1 prostate cancer: the case for treatment.
    Bahnson RR
    Semin Urol; 1993 May; 11(2):54-7. PubMed ID: 7689739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Editorial comment on: tumour grade, treatment, and relative survival in a population-based cohort of men with potentially curable prostate cancer.
    Gallina A
    Eur Urol; 2010 Apr; 57(4):639. PubMed ID: 19299073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Editorial comment on: tumor grade, treatment, and relative survival in a population-based cohort of men with potentially curable prostate cancer.
    Yossepowitch O
    Eur Urol; 2010 Apr; 57(4):639-40. PubMed ID: 19299071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. It's time to abandon an upper limit of normal for prostate specific antigen: assessing the risk of prostate cancer.
    Thompson IM; Ankerst DP; Etzioni R; Wang T
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1219-22. PubMed ID: 18707707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [PSA doubling times of prostate carcinoma managed with watchful observation alone].
    Dunst J
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2001 Dec; 177(12):684-5. PubMed ID: 11789411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prostate-specific antigen dynamics and prostate cancer diagnosis.
    Bartoletti R
    Eur Urol; 2009 Nov; 56(5):761-2; discussion 763. PubMed ID: 19665286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer: what are the results and how safe is it?
    Klotz L
    Curr Urol Rep; 2007 Sep; 8(5):341-4. PubMed ID: 17880830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening for prostate cancer remains controversial.
    Stark JR; Mucci L; Rothman KJ; Adami HO
    BMJ; 2009 Sep; 339():b3601. PubMed ID: 19778971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in prostate cancer grade on serial biopsy in men undergoing active surveillance.
    Porten SP; Whitson JM; Cowan JE; Cooperberg MR; Shinohara K; Perez N; Greene KL; Meng MV; Carroll PR
    J Clin Oncol; 2011 Jul; 29(20):2795-800. PubMed ID: 21632511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why are a high overdiagnosis probability and a long lead time for prostate cancer screening so important?
    Barry MJ; Mulley AJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Mar; 101(6):362-3. PubMed ID: 19276451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.