295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19286305)
1. Re: Mesut Remzi, Michael Marberger. Renal tumor biopsies for evaluation of small renal tumors: why, in whom, and how? Eur urol 2009;55:359-67.
Park BK
Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):e99-100; author reply e101-2. PubMed ID: 19286305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Re: Paul L. Crispen, Michael L. Blute. Do percutaneous renal tumor biopsies at initial presentation affect treatment strategies? Eur Urol 2009;55:307-9.
Park BK
Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):e105-6. PubMed ID: 19297078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Approach to the small renal mass: to treat or not to treat.
Kim SP; Thompson RH
Urol Clin North Am; 2012 May; 39(2):171-9, vi. PubMed ID: 22487760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The value of preoperative needle core biopsy for diagnosing benign lesions among small, incidentally detected renal masses.
Shannon BA; Cohen RJ; de Bruto H; Davies RJ
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1257-61; discussion 1261. PubMed ID: 18707712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Renal surgery--is technique more important than tumor or patient characteristics in preserving kidney function?
Goldfarb DA
J Urol; 2011 Feb; 185(2):383-4. PubMed ID: 21168169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Re: Steiner T, Knels R, Schubert J. Prognostic significance of tumor size in patients after tumour nephrectomy for localised renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 46;2004:327-30.
Bogdanovic J
Eur Urol; 2005 Feb; 47(2):266-7. PubMed ID: 15661427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Histopathologic analysis of peritumoral pseudocapsule and surgical margin status after tumor enucleation for renal cell carcinoma.
Minervini A; di Cristofano C; Lapini A; Marchi M; Lanzi F; Giubilei G; Tosi N; Tuccio A; Mancini M; della Rocca C; Serni S; Bevilacqua G; Carini M
Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1410-8. PubMed ID: 18692300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Re: Renal mass biopsy--a renaissance? B. R. Lane, M. K. Samplaski, B. R. Herts, M. Zhou, A. C. Novick and S. C. Campbell J Urol 2008; 179: 20-27.
Park BK
J Urol; 2009 May; 181(5):2386. PubMed ID: 19303098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rebuttal from authors re: Edward M. Messing. Node positive renal cell cancer. Who can be helped? Eur Urol 2007;51:1477-8.
Karakiewicz P; Perrotte P; Trinh QD; Patard JJ
Eur Urol; 2007 Jun; 51(6):1478-80. PubMed ID: 17275988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. CXCR3-B expression correlates with tumor necrosis extension in renal cell carcinoma.
Gacci M; Serni S; Lapini A; Vittori G; Alessandrini M; Nesi G; Palli D; Carini M
J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):843-8. PubMed ID: 19095263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment of patients with small renal masses: a survey of the American Urological Association.
Breau RH; Crispen PL; Jenkins SM; Blute ML; Leibovich BC
J Urol; 2011 Feb; 185(2):407-13. PubMed ID: 21168170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Renal cell carcinoma with skin metastasis.
Gurer CK; Karaduman A; Bukulmez G; Sahin S; Ozkaya O; Erkan I
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2004 May; 18(3):386-7. PubMed ID: 15096171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the kidney.
Jenkins LC; Whittington E; Ciancio G; Jorda M
J Urol; 2013 Jun; 189(6):2310-1. PubMed ID: 23507397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Re: Matthew N. Simmons, Benjamin I. Chung, Inderbir S. Gill. Perioperative efficacy of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors larger than 4 cm. Eur Urol 2009;55:199-208.
Baumert H
Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):e103; author reply e104. PubMed ID: 19249152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Worth a second look: outcomes of patients with initial finding of regular renal tissue in CT-guided renal tumor biopsies.
Sadat-Khonsari M; Papayannis M; Schriefer P; Kluth L; Meyer C; Schüttfort V; Regier M; Rink M; Chun F; Fisch M; Becker A
World J Urol; 2018 May; 36(5):789-792. PubMed ID: 29372355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does renal mass ablation provide adequate long-term oncologic control?
Faddegon S; Cadeddu JA
Urol Clin North Am; 2012 May; 39(2):181-90, vi. PubMed ID: 22487761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Re: Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared with partial nephrectomy.
Amer H; Heimbach JK; Taler SJ; Prieto M; Textor SC
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):780. PubMed ID: 18554630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Rebuttal from authors re: Vincenzo Ficarra, Antonio Galfano and Stefano Cavalleri. Is simple enucleation a minimal partial nephrectomy responding to the EAU guidelines' recommendations? Eur Urol 2009;55:1315-8.
Minervini A; Serni S; Di Cristofano C; Carini M
Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1319-20. PubMed ID: 18804906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Choice of operation for clinically localized renal tumor.
Nguyen CT; Campbell SC; Novick AC
Urol Clin North Am; 2008 Nov; 35(4):645-55; vii. PubMed ID: 18992618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Re: Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma--a meta-analysis and review D. A. Kunkle, B. L. Egleston and R. G. Uzzo J Urol 2008; 179: 1227-1234.
Raman JD; Cadeddu JA
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1567-8; author reply 1568. PubMed ID: 18710769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
