These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19286371)

  • 1. Development of environmentally superior technologies in the US and policy.
    Williams CM
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Nov; 100(22):5512-8. PubMed ID: 19286371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of environmentally superior treatment system to replace anaerobic swine lagoons in the USA.
    Vanotti MB; Szogi AA; Hunt PG; Millner PD; Humenik FJ
    Bioresour Technol; 2007 Dec; 98(17):3184-94. PubMed ID: 16919936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Greenhouse gas emission reduction and environmental quality improvement from implementation of aerobic waste treatment systems in swine farms.
    Vanotti MB; Szogi AA; Vives CA
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(4):759-66. PubMed ID: 18060761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of a second-generation environmentally superior technology for treatment of swine manure in the USA.
    Vanotti MB; Szogi AA; Millner PD; Loughrin JH
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Nov; 100(22):5406-16. PubMed ID: 19286373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Water quality improvements of wastewater from confined animal feeding operations after advanced treatment.
    Vanotti MB; Szogi AA
    J Environ Qual; 2008; 37(5 Suppl):S86-96. PubMed ID: 18765782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterizing ammonia emissions from swine farms in eastern North Carolina: part 2--potential environmentally superior technologies for waste treatment.
    Aneja VP; Arya SP; Rumsey IC; Kim DS; Bajwa K; Arkinson HL; Semunegus H; Dickey DA; Stefanski LA; Todd L; Mottus K; Robarge WP; Williams CM
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2008 Sep; 58(9):1145-57. PubMed ID: 18817107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Environmentally superior technologies for swine waste management.
    Humenik FJ; Rice JM; Baird CL; Koelsch R
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(5-6):15-21. PubMed ID: 15137402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advanced swine manure treatment and utilization in Brazil.
    Kunz A; Miele M; Steinmetz RL
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Nov; 100(22):5485-9. PubMed ID: 19128963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sustainable intensive livestock production demands manure and exhaust air treatment technologies.
    Melse RW; Timmerman M
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Nov; 100(22):5506-11. PubMed ID: 19342230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integrated anaerobic/aerobic biological treatment for intensive swine production.
    Bortone G
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Nov; 100(22):5424-30. PubMed ID: 19135363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Flemish manure policy as a case of economic management of ecologic problems.
    Van der Straeten B; Buysse J
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(4):75-81. PubMed ID: 20420226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meeting environmental requirements for the land application of manure.
    Centner TJ; Newton GL
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Nov; 86(11):3228-34. PubMed ID: 18539820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of full-scale biofilter with rockwool mixture treating ammonia gas from livestock manure composting.
    Yasuda T; Kuroda K; Fukumoto Y; Hanajima D; Suzuki K
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Feb; 100(4):1568-72. PubMed ID: 18977137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of the greenhouse effect impact of technologies used for energy recovery from municipal waste: a case for England.
    Papageorgiou A; Barton JR; Karagiannidis A
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90(10):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 19482412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Economic impacts of invasive species in forests: past, present, and future.
    Holmes TP; Aukema JE; Von Holle B; Liebhold A; Sills E
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Apr; 1162():18-38. PubMed ID: 19432643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the choice of farm management practices after the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy in 2003.
    Schmid E; Sinabell F
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Feb; 82(3):332-40. PubMed ID: 17095138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Environmental impact minimization of a total wastewater treatment network system from a life cycle perspective.
    Lim SR; Park JM
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Mar; 90(3):1454-62. PubMed ID: 19008032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Challenges and innovations on biological treatment of livestock effluents.
    Bernet N; Béline F
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Nov; 100(22):5431-6. PubMed ID: 19269810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of second-generation multistage wastewater treatment system for the removal of malodors from liquid swine waste.
    Loughrin JH; Vanotti MB; Szogi AA; Lovanh N
    J Environ Qual; 2009; 38(4):1739-48. PubMed ID: 19549951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Renewable energy from gasification of manure: an innovative technology in search of fertile policy.
    Buckley JC; Schwarz PM
    Environ Monit Assess; 2003 May; 84(1-2):111-27. PubMed ID: 12733813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.