167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19286763)
1. Ghost writers in the sky.
Chabner BA
Oncologist; 2009 Mar; 14(3):199-200. PubMed ID: 19286763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ghost writers in the sky.
J Urol; 2008 Mar; 179(3):809-10. PubMed ID: 18221969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Re: Ghost writers in the sky.
Michel MC
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):788; discussion 788. PubMed ID: 18555489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The involvement of professional medical writers in medical publications.
Daskalopoulou SS; Mikhailidis DP
Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 Feb; 21(2):307-10. PubMed ID: 15802002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Authorship policy.
Novack GD
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 147(1):184; author reply 184-5. PubMed ID: 19100357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Unmasking ghost writers.
Reidenberg JW
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2001 Sep; 70(3):208-9. PubMed ID: 11557907
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. How to ensure our readers' trust: the proper attribution of authors and contributors.
Liesegang TJ; Albert DM; Schachat AP
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 146(3):337-40. PubMed ID: 18724976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comments on European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publications.
Foote M; Hamilton CW; Mallia-Hughes M
Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 May; 21(5):703-4; author reply 704. PubMed ID: 15969869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Authorship and acknowledgements.
Peh WC; Ng KH
Singapore Med J; 2009 Jun; 50(6):563-5; quiz 566. PubMed ID: 19551307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transparency and trust: in defence of medical writers.
Jacobs A
BMJ; 2004 Dec; 329(7478):1345. PubMed ID: 15576758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The ethical assignment of authorship in scientific publications: issues and guidelines.
Feeser VR; Simon JR
Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Oct; 15(10):963-9. PubMed ID: 18801021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The 'truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth...'.
Broome ME
Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(6):281-2. PubMed ID: 19041445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Authorship: pride and proliferation.
Lee SS
Liver Int; 2009 Apr; 29(4):477. PubMed ID: 19323776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethical guidelines deciding the authorship.
Sholapurkar AA
Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(3):315. PubMed ID: 20930334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientific publishing. The undisclosed background of a paper on a depression treatment.
Holden C
Science; 2006 Aug; 313(5787):598-9. PubMed ID: 16888105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ghostbusters should only bust ghosts.
Adamson LM; Whitman M; Jacobs A; Bunting-Early TE
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Oct; 26(10):1067-8. PubMed ID: 18846064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Author review in publishing science.
Krull IS
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2005 Nov; 827(1):1. PubMed ID: 16239131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Author lists: specify who did what to aid assessment.
Vital MV
Nature; 2006 Sep; 443(7107):26. PubMed ID: 16957708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Second thoughts on who goes where in author lists.
Laurance WF
Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7098):26. PubMed ID: 16823429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Authorship in scholarly manuscripts: practical considerations for resident and early career physicians.
Tsao CI; Roberts LW
Acad Psychiatry; 2009; 33(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 19349451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
