BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19286818)

  • 1. Impact of water troughs on cattle use of riparian zones in the Georgia Piedmont in the United States.
    Franklin DH; Cabrera ML; Byers HL; Matthews MK; Andrae JG; Radcliffe DE; McCann MA; Kuykendall HA; Hoveland CS; Calvert VH
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jun; 87(6):2151-9. PubMed ID: 19286818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phosphorus, sediment, and Escherichia coli loads in unfenced streams of the Georgia Piedmont, USA.
    Byers HL; Cabrera ML; Matthews MK; Franklin DH; Andrae JG; Radcliffe DE; McCann MA; Kuykendall HA; Hoveland CS; Calvert VH
    J Environ Qual; 2005; 34(6):2293-300. PubMed ID: 16275730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of pasture management and off-stream water on temporal/spatial distribution of cattle and stream bank characteristics in cool-season grass pastures.
    Schwarte KA; Russell JR; Morrical DG
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Oct; 89(10):3236-47. PubMed ID: 21531847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pasture size effects on the ability of off-stream water or restricted stream access to alter the spatial/temporal distribution of grazing beef cows.
    Bisinger JJ; Russell JR; Morrical DG; Isenhart TM
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3650-8. PubMed ID: 24987062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hydrogeologic controls on the transport and fate of nitrate in ground water beneath riparian buffer zones: results from thirteen studies across the United States.
    Puckett LJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(3):47-53. PubMed ID: 15053098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Water quality dynamics and hydrology in nitrate loaded riparian zones in the Netherlands.
    Hefting M; Beltman B; Karssenberg D; Rebel K; van Riessen M; Spijker M
    Environ Pollut; 2006 Jan; 139(1):143-56. PubMed ID: 15996804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stream buffer effectiveness in an agriculturally influenced area, southwestern Georgia: responses of water quality, macroinvertebrates, and amphibians.
    Muenz TK; Golladay SW; Vellidis G; Smith LL
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(5):1924-38. PubMed ID: 16973634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of riparian zone protection from cattle on nutrient, bacteria, F-coliphage, and loading of an intermittent stream.
    Sunohara MD; Topp E; Wilkes G; Gottschall N; Neumann N; Ruecker N; Jones TH; Edge TA; Marti R; Lapen DR
    J Environ Qual; 2012; 41(4):1301-14. PubMed ID: 22751075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the impact of changes in landuse and management practices on the diffuse pollution and retention of nitrate in a riparian floodplain.
    Krause S; Jacobs J; Voss A; Bronstert A; Zehe E
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Jan; 389(1):149-64. PubMed ID: 17915291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of streambank fencing on the environmental quality of cattle-excluded pastures.
    Miller JJ; Chanasyk DS; Curtis T; Willms WD
    J Environ Qual; 2010; 39(3):991-1000. PubMed ID: 20400594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The release of phosphorus to porewater and surface water from river riparian sediments.
    Surridge BW; Heathwaite AL; Baird AJ
    J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(5):1534-44. PubMed ID: 17766834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of riparian buffers in controlling ground-water discharge of nitrate to streams in selected hydrogeologic settings of the North Carolina Coastal Plain.
    Spruill TB
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(3):63-70. PubMed ID: 15053100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Streamside management zones effectiveness for protecting water quality after forestland application of biosolids.
    Pratt WA; Fox TR
    J Environ Qual; 2009; 38(5):2106-20. PubMed ID: 19704153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impacts of land cover on stream hydrology in the West Georgia Piedmont, USA.
    Schoonover JE; Lockaby BG; Helms BS
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(6):2123-31. PubMed ID: 17071881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modelling bacterial water quality in streams draining pastoral land.
    Collins R; Rutherford K
    Water Res; 2004 Feb; 38(3):700-12. PubMed ID: 14723940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stream and riparian management for freshwater turtles.
    Bodie JR
    J Environ Manage; 2001 Aug; 62(4):443-55. PubMed ID: 11505769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forage systems for cow-calf production in the Appalachian region.
    Scaglia G; Swecker WS; Fontenot JP; Fiske D; Fike JH; Abaye AO; Peterson PR; Clapham W; Hall JB
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Aug; 86(8):2032-42. PubMed ID: 18407993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Field-based evaluation tool for riparian buffer zones in agricultural catchments.
    Ducros CM; Joyce CB
    Environ Manage; 2003 Aug; 32(2):252-67. PubMed ID: 14753650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Water quality in the upper Han River basin, China: the impacts of land use/land cover in riparian buffer zone.
    Li S; Gu S; Tan X; Zhang Q
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jun; 165(1-3):317-24. PubMed ID: 19019532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new heat load index for feedlot cattle.
    Gaughan JB; Mader TL; Holt SM; Lisle A
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Jan; 86(1):226-34. PubMed ID: 17911236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.