These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19286818)

  • 1. Impact of water troughs on cattle use of riparian zones in the Georgia Piedmont in the United States.
    Franklin DH; Cabrera ML; Byers HL; Matthews MK; Andrae JG; Radcliffe DE; McCann MA; Kuykendall HA; Hoveland CS; Calvert VH
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jun; 87(6):2151-9. PubMed ID: 19286818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phosphorus, sediment, and Escherichia coli loads in unfenced streams of the Georgia Piedmont, USA.
    Byers HL; Cabrera ML; Matthews MK; Franklin DH; Andrae JG; Radcliffe DE; McCann MA; Kuykendall HA; Hoveland CS; Calvert VH
    J Environ Qual; 2005; 34(6):2293-300. PubMed ID: 16275730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of pasture management and off-stream water on temporal/spatial distribution of cattle and stream bank characteristics in cool-season grass pastures.
    Schwarte KA; Russell JR; Morrical DG
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Oct; 89(10):3236-47. PubMed ID: 21531847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pasture size effects on the ability of off-stream water or restricted stream access to alter the spatial/temporal distribution of grazing beef cows.
    Bisinger JJ; Russell JR; Morrical DG; Isenhart TM
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3650-8. PubMed ID: 24987062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hydrogeologic controls on the transport and fate of nitrate in ground water beneath riparian buffer zones: results from thirteen studies across the United States.
    Puckett LJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(3):47-53. PubMed ID: 15053098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Water quality dynamics and hydrology in nitrate loaded riparian zones in the Netherlands.
    Hefting M; Beltman B; Karssenberg D; Rebel K; van Riessen M; Spijker M
    Environ Pollut; 2006 Jan; 139(1):143-56. PubMed ID: 15996804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stream buffer effectiveness in an agriculturally influenced area, southwestern Georgia: responses of water quality, macroinvertebrates, and amphibians.
    Muenz TK; Golladay SW; Vellidis G; Smith LL
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(5):1924-38. PubMed ID: 16973634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of riparian zone protection from cattle on nutrient, bacteria, F-coliphage, and loading of an intermittent stream.
    Sunohara MD; Topp E; Wilkes G; Gottschall N; Neumann N; Ruecker N; Jones TH; Edge TA; Marti R; Lapen DR
    J Environ Qual; 2012; 41(4):1301-14. PubMed ID: 22751075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the impact of changes in landuse and management practices on the diffuse pollution and retention of nitrate in a riparian floodplain.
    Krause S; Jacobs J; Voss A; Bronstert A; Zehe E
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Jan; 389(1):149-64. PubMed ID: 17915291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of streambank fencing on the environmental quality of cattle-excluded pastures.
    Miller JJ; Chanasyk DS; Curtis T; Willms WD
    J Environ Qual; 2010; 39(3):991-1000. PubMed ID: 20400594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The release of phosphorus to porewater and surface water from river riparian sediments.
    Surridge BW; Heathwaite AL; Baird AJ
    J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(5):1534-44. PubMed ID: 17766834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of riparian buffers in controlling ground-water discharge of nitrate to streams in selected hydrogeologic settings of the North Carolina Coastal Plain.
    Spruill TB
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(3):63-70. PubMed ID: 15053100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Streamside management zones effectiveness for protecting water quality after forestland application of biosolids.
    Pratt WA; Fox TR
    J Environ Qual; 2009; 38(5):2106-20. PubMed ID: 19704153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impacts of land cover on stream hydrology in the West Georgia Piedmont, USA.
    Schoonover JE; Lockaby BG; Helms BS
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(6):2123-31. PubMed ID: 17071881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modelling bacterial water quality in streams draining pastoral land.
    Collins R; Rutherford K
    Water Res; 2004 Feb; 38(3):700-12. PubMed ID: 14723940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stream and riparian management for freshwater turtles.
    Bodie JR
    J Environ Manage; 2001 Aug; 62(4):443-55. PubMed ID: 11505769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forage systems for cow-calf production in the Appalachian region.
    Scaglia G; Swecker WS; Fontenot JP; Fiske D; Fike JH; Abaye AO; Peterson PR; Clapham W; Hall JB
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Aug; 86(8):2032-42. PubMed ID: 18407993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Field-based evaluation tool for riparian buffer zones in agricultural catchments.
    Ducros CM; Joyce CB
    Environ Manage; 2003 Aug; 32(2):252-67. PubMed ID: 14753650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Water quality in the upper Han River basin, China: the impacts of land use/land cover in riparian buffer zone.
    Li S; Gu S; Tan X; Zhang Q
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jun; 165(1-3):317-24. PubMed ID: 19019532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new heat load index for feedlot cattle.
    Gaughan JB; Mader TL; Holt SM; Lisle A
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Jan; 86(1):226-34. PubMed ID: 17911236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.