These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19287175)

  • 41. Speech technology-based assessment of phoneme intelligibility in dysarthria.
    Van Nuffelen G; Middag C; De Bodt M; Martens JP
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2009; 44(5):716-30. PubMed ID: 18821111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effects of Lexical and Somatosensory Feedback on Long-Term Improvements in Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech.
    Borrie SA; Schäfer MCM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 60(8):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 28687828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Auditory discrimination as a condition for E-learning based Speech Therapy: a proposal for an auditory discrimination test (ADT) for adult dysarthric speakers.
    Beijer LJ; Rietveld AC; van Stiphout AJ
    J Commun Disord; 2011; 44(6):701-18. PubMed ID: 21719027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The relationship between information transfer and speech intelligibility of dysarthric speakers.
    Beukelman DR; Yorkston KM
    J Commun Disord; 1979 May; 12(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 438358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Speech Prosody Across Stimulus Types for Individuals with Parkinson's Disease.
    K-Y Ma J; Schneider CB; Hoffmann R; Storch A
    J Parkinsons Dis; 2015; 5(2):291-9. PubMed ID: 25697957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of loud and amplified speech on sentence and word intelligibility in Parkinson disease.
    Neel AT
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 52(4):1021-33. PubMed ID: 18978211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Influence of passage familiarity on intelligibility estimates of dysarthric speech.
    Beukelman DR; Yorkston KM
    J Commun Disord; 1980 Jan; 13(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 7354140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Preparing an E-learning-based Speech Therapy (EST) efficacy study: Identifying suitable outcome measures to detect within-subject changes of speech intelligibility in dysarthric speakers.
    Beijer LJ; Rietveld AC; Ruiter MB; Geurts AC
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2014 Dec; 28(12):927-50. PubMed ID: 25025268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Quantitative assessment of interutterance stability: application to dysarthria.
    Cummins F; Lowit A; van Brenk F
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 57(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 24687469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Predicting Intelligibility Gains in Dysarthria Through Automated Speech Feature Analysis.
    Fletcher AR; Wisler AA; McAuliffe MJ; Lansford KL; Liss JM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Nov; 60(11):3058-3068. PubMed ID: 29075755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A statistical causal model for the assessment of dysarthric speech and the utility of computer-based speech recognition.
    Sy BK; Horowitz DM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Dec; 40(12):1282-98. PubMed ID: 8125504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Construct-related validity of the TOCS measures: comparison of intelligibility and speaking rate scores in children with and without speech disorders.
    Hodge MM; Gotzke CL
    J Commun Disord; 2014; 51():51-63. PubMed ID: 25069811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Production and perception of mandarin tone in adults with cerebral palsy.
    Jeng JY; Weismer G; Kent RD
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(1):67-87. PubMed ID: 16393799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The Role of Somatosensory Information in Speech Perception: Imitation Improves Recognition of Disordered Speech.
    Borrie SA; Schäfer MC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 58(6):1708-16. PubMed ID: 26536172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A multi-views multi-learners approach towards dysarthric speech recognition using multi-nets artificial neural networks.
    Shahamiri SR; Salim SS
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Sep; 22(5):1053-63. PubMed ID: 24760940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Communication efficiency of dysarthric speakers as measured by sentence intelligibility and speaking rate.
    Yorkston KM; Beukelman DR
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1981 Aug; 46(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 7278175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Influence of visual information on the intelligibility of dysarthric speech.
    Keintz CK; Bunton K; Hoit JD
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2007 Aug; 16(3):222-34. PubMed ID: 17666548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Speech, prosody, and voice characteristics of a mother and daughter with a 7;13 translocation affecting FOXP2.
    Shriberg LD; Ballard KJ; Tomblin JB; Duffy JR; Odell KH; Williams CA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Jun; 49(3):500-25. PubMed ID: 16787893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Ataxic dysarthria: treatment sequences based on intelligibility and prosodic considerations.
    Yorkston KM; Beukelman DR
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1981 Nov; 46(4):398-404. PubMed ID: 7300267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Electropalatographic (EPG) assessment of tongue-to-palate contacts in dysarthric speakers following TBI.
    Kuruvilla MS; Murdoch BE; Goozee JV
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008 Sep; 22(9):703-25. PubMed ID: 18608248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.