BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19288474)

  • 1. Docking to heme proteins.
    Röhrig UF; Grosdidier A; Zoete V; Michielin O
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Nov; 30(14):2305-15. PubMed ID: 19288474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EADock: docking of small molecules into protein active sites with a multiobjective evolutionary optimization.
    Grosdidier A; Zoete V; Michielin O
    Proteins; 2007 Jun; 67(4):1010-25. PubMed ID: 17380512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. FDS: flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft-core energy function.
    Taylor RD; Jewsbury PJ; Essex JW
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1637-56. PubMed ID: 12926007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of binding modes for ligands in the cytochromes P450 and other heme-containing proteins.
    Kirton SB; Murray CW; Verdonk ML; Taylor RD
    Proteins; 2005 Mar; 58(4):836-44. PubMed ID: 15651036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of the FACTS solvation model for protein-ligand docking calculations. Application to EADock.
    Zoete V; Grosdidier A; Cuendet M; Michielin O
    J Mol Recognit; 2010; 23(5):457-61. PubMed ID: 20101644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.
    Cavasotto CN; Abagyan RA
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Mar; 337(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 15001363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Molecular docking for substrate identification: the short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases.
    Favia AD; Nobeli I; Glaser F; Thornton JM
    J Mol Biol; 2008 Jan; 375(3):855-74. PubMed ID: 18036612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lessons in molecular recognition: the effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy.
    Erickson JA; Jalaie M; Robertson DH; Lewis RA; Vieth M
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 14695819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detailed analysis of grid-based molecular docking: A case study of CDOCKER-A CHARMm-based MD docking algorithm.
    Wu G; Robertson DH; Brooks CL; Vieth M
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1549-62. PubMed ID: 12925999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.
    Cheng T; Li X; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 19358517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.
    Perola E; Walters WP; Charifson PS
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):235-49. PubMed ID: 15211508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. GalaxyDock2-HEME: Protein-ligand docking for heme proteins.
    Lee C; Yang J; Kwon S; Seok C
    J Comput Chem; 2023 May; 44(14):1369-1380. PubMed ID: 36809651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Classical force field parameters for the heme prosthetic group of cytochrome c.
    Autenrieth F; Tajkhorshid E; Baudry J; Luthey-Schulten Z
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Oct; 25(13):1613-22. PubMed ID: 15264255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High resolution fast quantitative docking using Fourier domain correlation techniques.
    Blom NS; Sygusch J
    Proteins; 1997 Apr; 27(4):493-506. PubMed ID: 9141130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling heme proteins using atomistic simulations.
    Bikiel DE; Boechi L; Capece L; Crespo A; De Biase PM; Di Lella S; González Lebrero MC; Martí MA; Nadra AD; Perissinotti LL; Scherlis DA; Estrin DA
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2006 Dec; 8(48):5611-28. PubMed ID: 17149482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. General and targeted statistical potentials for protein-ligand interactions.
    Mooij WT; Verdonk ML
    Proteins; 2005 Nov; 61(2):272-87. PubMed ID: 16106379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Insights into docking and scoring neuronal alpha4beta2 nicotinic receptor agonists using molecular dynamics simulations and QM/MM calculations.
    Sgrignani J; Bonaccini C; Grazioso G; Chioccioli M; Cavalli A; Gratteri P
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Nov; 30(15):2443-54. PubMed ID: 19360794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Blind docking of 260 protein-ligand complexes with EADock 2.0.
    Grosdidier A; Zoete V; Michielin O
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Oct; 30(13):2021-30. PubMed ID: 19130502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations.
    Claussen H; Buning C; Rarey M; Lengauer T
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr; 308(2):377-95. PubMed ID: 11327774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.