These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19288616)

  • 1. State constitutional law - same-sex relations - Supreme Court of Michigan holds that public employers may not provide healthcare benefits to same-sex domestic partners of employees. - National Pride at Work, Inc. v. Governor of Michigan, 748 N.W.2d 524 (Mich. 2008).
    Harv Law Rev; 2009 Feb; 122(4):1263-70. PubMed ID: 19288616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Legal recognition of same-sex relationships in the United States: a social science perspective.
    Herek GM
    Am Psychol; 2006 Sep; 61(6):607-21. PubMed ID: 16953748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Public sector health benefits--same-sex domestic partners. Irizarry v. Board of Education of the city of Chicago, 251 F.3d 604 (7th Cir. 2001).
    Benefits Q; 2004; 20(1):62-3. PubMed ID: 15015426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Employer health coverage for domestic partners--identifying the issues.
    Laarman LM
    Employee Relat Law J; 1993; 18(4):567-80. PubMed ID: 10123813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A change in status: same-sex couples eligible for benefits, tax breaks.
    Carlson J
    Mod Healthc; 2013 Jul; 43(26):14-5. PubMed ID: 23878902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gay marriage: a civil right.
    Dean CR
    J Homosex; 1994; 27(3-4):111-5. PubMed ID: 7860979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recent developments in domestic partner benefits.
    Davis E
    Empl Benefits J; 1998 Mar; 23(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 10177578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sex discrimination or a hard pill for employers to swallow: examining the denial of contraceptive benefits in the wake of Erickson v. Bartell Drug Co.
    Korland L
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 2002; 53(2):531-67. PubMed ID: 16506335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The rise and fall of civil unions: lessons from the Connecticut legislature's abandonment of gay and lesbian citizens.
    Thomas SL
    J Homosex; 2011; 58(3):315-29. PubMed ID: 21360389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Federal Employees Health Benefits and Federal Employees Dental and Vision Insurance Programs' Coverage Exception for Children of Same-Sex Domestic Partners. Interim final rule.
    U.S. Office of Personnel Management
    Fed Regist; 2016 Dec; 81(232):86905-6. PubMed ID: 27992153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The geography of civil unions in Vermont.
    Coulmont B
    J Lesbian Stud; 2005; 9(1-2):183-93. PubMed ID: 19780275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Federal Employees Health Benefits Program and Federal Employees Dental and Vision Insurance Program: Expiration of Coverage of Children of Same-Sex Domestic Partners; Federal Flexible Benefits Plan: Pre-Tax Payment of Health Benefits Premiums: Conforming Amendments. Final rule.
    U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
    Fed Regist; 2018 Jul; 83(134):32191-3. PubMed ID: 30020578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Domestic disputes. Nearly every state prohibits same-sex marriage. But what are the rights of transsexuals who wed?
    Thigpen DE
    Time; 2002 Mar; 159(9):53. PubMed ID: 11894671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What same sex civil partnerships may mean for health.
    King M; Bartlett A
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2006 Mar; 60(3):188-91. PubMed ID: 16476745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Domestic partnership benefits: why not offer them to same-sex partners and unmarried opposite sex partners?
    Zielinski D
    J Law Health; 1998-1999; 13(2):281-324. PubMed ID: 10947397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Civil Rights and Health--Beyond Same-Sex Marriage.
    Landers S
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Sep; 373(12):1092-3. PubMed ID: 26267450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Domestic partnership benefits.
    Brossman ME; Kramnick RK
    Empl Benefits J; 1994 Mar; 19(1):2-4, 29. PubMed ID: 10132233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cases with Consequences: Recent Supreme Court rulings were game-changers for the states--and not just because of the decisions on health care and same-sex marriage.
    Soronen L
    State Legis; 2015 Sep; 41(8):19-21. PubMed ID: 26320276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-year follow-up of same-sex couples who had civil unions in Vermont, same-sex couples not in civil unions, and heterosexual married couples.
    Balsam KF; Beauchaine TP; Rothblum ED; Solomon SE
    Dev Psychol; 2008 Jan; 44(1):102-16. PubMed ID: 18194009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Supreme Court upholds mandatory benefit law.
    McCann RW
    Health Law Vigil; 1985 Jun; 8(13):1-3. PubMed ID: 10272362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.