These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19289357)

  • 41. Context differences in children's ingroup preferences.
    Mulvey KL; Hitti A; Rutland A; Abrams D; Killen M
    Dev Psychol; 2014 May; 50(5):1507-19. PubMed ID: 24491215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A double standard when group members behave badly: transgression credit to ingroup leaders.
    Abrams D; Randsley de Moura G; Travaglino GA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):799-815. PubMed ID: 23895265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. I'm like you and you're like me: social projection and self-stereotyping both help explain self-other correspondence.
    Cho JC; Knowles ED
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Mar; 104(3):444-56. PubMed ID: 23276270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Social psychological research on prejudice as collective action supporting emergent ingroup members.
    Ferguson MA; Branscombe NR; Reynolds KJ
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2019 Jan; 58(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 30446999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The effect of exemplar activation on mental representations of the ingroup: the moderating role of relative ingroup size.
    Coats S; Bayer ER; Worthen JB
    Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(2):219-36. PubMed ID: 17650919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Developmental changes in young children's willingness to copy the antisocial actions of ingroup members in a minimal group context.
    Wilks M; Kirby J; Nielsen M
    Dev Psychol; 2019 Apr; 55(4):709-721. PubMed ID: 30570299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The role of intergroup biases in children's endorsement of information about novel individuals.
    Aldan P; Soley G
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Mar; 179():291-307. PubMed ID: 30562635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The cognitive representation of self-stereotyping.
    Latrofa M; Vaes J; Cadinu M; Carnaghi A
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Jul; 36(7):911-22. PubMed ID: 20519574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Does a Common Ingroup Identity Reduce Weight Bias? Only When Weight Discrimination Is Salient.
    Brochu PM; Banfield JC; Dovidio JF
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():3020. PubMed ID: 32038393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The Politics of Affirmation Theory: When Group-Affirmation Leads to Greater Ingroup Bias.
    Ehrlich GA; Gramzow RH
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1110-22. PubMed ID: 26070859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Intergroup boundaries and attitudes: the power of a single potent link.
    Gulker JE; Monteith MJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Jul; 39(7):943-55. PubMed ID: 23613121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Categorisation salience and ingroup bias: the buffering role of a multicultural ideology.
    Costa-Lopes R; Pereira CR; Judd CM
    Int J Psychol; 2014 Dec; 49(6):508-12. PubMed ID: 25355674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Ingroup vitality and intergroup attitudes in a linguistic minority.
    Liebkind K; Jasinskaja-Lahti I; Teräsaho M
    Scand J Psychol; 2007 Oct; 48(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 17877556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. On the immediate consequences of intergroup categorization: activation of approach and avoidance motor behavior toward ingroup and outgroup members.
    Paladino MP; Castelli L
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jun; 34(6):755-68. PubMed ID: 18388255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Differentiating Between Belief-Indicative and Status-Indicative Groups Improves Predictions of Intergroup Attitudes.
    Grigoryan L; Jones BH; Cohrs JC; Boehnke K; Easterbrook MJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Jul; 49(7):1097-1112. PubMed ID: 35596556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Perceived entitativity and the black-sheep effect: when will we denigrate negative ingroup members?
    Lewis AC; Sherman SJ
    J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(2):211-25. PubMed ID: 20397595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Primacy of warmth versus competence: a motivated bias?
    Richetin J; Durante F; Mari S; Perugini M; Volpato C
    J Soc Psychol; 2012; 152(4):417-35. PubMed ID: 22822683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Crossed categorization in common ingroup contexts.
    Crisp RJ; Walsh J; Hewstone M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Sep; 32(9):1204-18. PubMed ID: 16902240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Tracking the timecourse of social perception: the effects of racial cues on event-related brain potentials.
    Ito TA; Thompson E; Cacioppo JT
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Oct; 30(10):1267-80. PubMed ID: 15466600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Minimal but meaningful: Probing the limits of randomly assigned social identities.
    Yang X; Dunham Y
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Sep; 185():19-34. PubMed ID: 31085424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.