These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19290310)

  • 1. Response of Cotton to Infection by Hoplolaimus columbus.
    Mueller JD; Sullivan MJ
    J Nematol; 1988 Oct; 20(Annals 2):86-9. PubMed ID: 19290310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chemical Control of Hoplolaimus columbus on Cotton and Soybean.
    Schmitt DP; Bailey JE
    J Nematol; 1990 Oct; 22(4S):689-94. PubMed ID: 19287781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of Cotton Production Systems on Management of Hoplolaimus columbus.
    Koenning SR; Edmisten KL; Barker KR; Morrison DE
    J Nematol; 2003 Mar; 35(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 19265977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Site specific nematode management-development and success in cotton production in the United States.
    Overstreet C; McGawley EC; Khalilian A; Kirkpatrick TL; Monfort WS; Henderson W; Mueller JD
    J Nematol; 2014 Dec; 46(4):309-20. PubMed ID: 25580023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of Fumigant Nematicides to Control Hoplolaimus columbus on Cotton.
    Noe JP
    J Nematol; 1990 Oct; 22(4S):718-23. PubMed ID: 19287786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cotton Tolerance to Hoplolaimus columbus and Impact on Population Densities.
    Koenning SR; Bowman DT
    Plant Dis; 2005 Jun; 89(6):649-653. PubMed ID: 30795391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-Analysis of the Field Efficacy of Seed- and Soil-Applied Nematicides on 
    Faske TR; Kandel Y; Allen TW; Grabau ZJ; Hu J; Kemerait RC; Lawrence GW; Lawrence KS; Mehl HL; Overstreet C; Thiessen LD; Wheeler T
    Plant Dis; 2022 Aug; 106(8):2228-2238. PubMed ID: 34978874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response of Rotylenchulus reniformis to Nematicide Applications on Cotton.
    Lawrence GW; McLean KS; Batson WE; Miller D; Borbon JC
    J Nematol; 1990 Oct; 22(4S):707-11. PubMed ID: 19287784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Management of Hoplolaimus columbus with Tolerant Soybean and Nematicides.
    Schmitt DP; Imbriani JL
    J Nematol; 1987 Oct; 19(Annals 1):59-63. PubMed ID: 19290277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of subsoiling and nematicides on Hoplolaimus columbus populations and cotton yield.
    Hussey RS
    J Nematol; 1977 Jan; 9(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 19305573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Responses of Cotton Yield and Meloidogyne incognita Soil Populations to Soil Applications of Aldicarb and 1,3-D in Florida.
    Kinloch RA; Rich JR
    J Nematol; 1998 Dec; 30(4S):639-42. PubMed ID: 19274259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamics of Concomitant Populations of Hoplolaimus columbus, Scutellonema brachyurum, and Meloidogyne incognita on Cotton.
    Kraus-Schmidt H; Lewis SA
    J Nematol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 19300720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Management of Meloidogyne incognita with Chemicals and Cultivars in Cotton in a Semi-Arid Environment.
    Wheeler TA; Siders KT; Anderson MG; Russell SA; Woodward JE; Mullinix BG
    J Nematol; 2014 Jun; 46(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 24987161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of one and two applications of nematicides on nematode populations and soybean yields.
    Minton NA; Parker MB; Perry CE
    J Nematol; 1980 Oct; 12(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 19300706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of Cotton Root Destruction and Winter Cover Crops for Suppression of Hoplolaimus columbus.
    Davis RF; Baird RE; McNeil RD
    J Nematol; 2000 Dec; 32(4S):550-5. PubMed ID: 19271009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Variable and Single-Rate Applications of Aldicarb on Cotton Yield in Fields Infested with Meloidogyne incognita.
    Wheeler TA; Kaufman HW; Baugh B; Kidd P; Schuster G; Siders K
    J Nematol; 1999 Dec; 31(4S):700-8. PubMed ID: 19270939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variable rate application of nematicides on cotton fields: a promising site-specific management strategy.
    Ortiz BV; Perry C; Sullivan D; Lu P; Kemerait R; Davis RF; Smith A; Vellidis G; Nichols R
    J Nematol; 2012 Mar; 44(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 23482903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between environmental variables and response of cotton to nematicides.
    Wheeler TA; Lawrence KS; Porter DO; Keeling W; Mullinix BG
    J Nematol; 2013 Mar; 45(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 23589654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Alternate row placement is ineffective for cultural control of Meloidogyne incognita in cotton.
    Davis RF
    J Nematol; 2008 Sep; 40(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 19440259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interaction between Meloidogyne incognita and Hoplolaimus columbus on Davis Soybean.
    Guy DW; Lewis SA
    J Nematol; 1987 Jul; 19(3):346-51. PubMed ID: 19290154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.