These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19291412)

  • 1. Recent advances in structure-based virtual screening of G-protein coupled receptors.
    Ananthan S; Zhang W; Hobrath JV
    AAPS J; 2009 Mar; 11(1):178-85. PubMed ID: 19291412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A benchmarking study on virtual ligand screening against homology models of human GPCRs.
    Lim VJY; Du W; Chen YZ; Fan H
    Proteins; 2018 Sep; 86(9):978-989. PubMed ID: 30051928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modern homology modeling of G-protein coupled receptors: which structural template to use?
    Mobarec JC; Sanchez R; Filizola M
    J Med Chem; 2009 Aug; 52(16):5207-16. PubMed ID: 19627087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficiency of Homology Modeling Assisted Molecular Docking in G-protein Coupled Receptors.
    Bhunia SS; Saxena AK
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2021; 21(4):269-294. PubMed ID: 32901584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do crystal structures obviate the need for theoretical models of GPCRs for structure-based virtual screening?
    Tang H; Wang XS; Hsieh JH; Tropsha A
    Proteins; 2012 Jun; 80(6):1503-21. PubMed ID: 22275072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Virtual Screening of Human Class-A GPCRs Using Ligand Profiles Built on Multiple Ligand-Receptor Interactions.
    Chan WKB; Zhang Y
    J Mol Biol; 2020 Aug; 432(17):4872-4890. PubMed ID: 32652079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling of human prokineticin receptors: interactions with novel small-molecule binders and potential off-target drugs.
    Levit A; Yarnitzky T; Wiener A; Meidan R; Niv MY
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e27990. PubMed ID: 22132188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extended template-based modeling and evaluation method using consensus of binding mode of GPCRs for virtual screening.
    Sato M; Hirokawa T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Nov; 54(11):3153-61. PubMed ID: 25350693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. X-ray structure breakthroughs in the GPCR transmembrane region.
    Topiol S; Sabio M
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2009 Jul; 78(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 19447219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving virtual screening of G protein-coupled receptors via ligand-directed modeling.
    Coudrat T; Simms J; Christopoulos A; Wootten D; Sexton PM
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Nov; 13(11):e1005819. PubMed ID: 29131821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing GPCR homology models constructed from templates of various transmembrane sequence identities: Binding mode prediction and docking enrichment.
    Loo JSE; Emtage AL; Ng KW; Yong ASJ; Doughty SW
    J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Mar; 80():38-47. PubMed ID: 29306746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sequence-derived three-dimensional pharmacophore models for G-protein-coupled receptors and their application in virtual screening.
    Klabunde T; Giegerich C; Evers A
    J Med Chem; 2009 May; 52(9):2923-32. PubMed ID: 19374402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Structural Framework for GPCR Chemogenomics: What's In a Residue Number?
    Vass M; Kooistra AJ; Verhoeven S; Gloriam D; de Esch IJP; de Graaf C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1705():73-113. PubMed ID: 29188559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. PREDICT modeling and in-silico screening for G-protein coupled receptors.
    Shacham S; Marantz Y; Bar-Haim S; Kalid O; Warshaviak D; Avisar N; Inbal B; Heifetz A; Fichman M; Topf M; Naor Z; Noiman S; Becker OM
    Proteins; 2004 Oct; 57(1):51-86. PubMed ID: 15326594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peptide recognition, signaling and modulation of class B G protein-coupled receptors.
    Cao C; Zhang H; Yang Z; Wu B
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2018 Aug; 51():53-60. PubMed ID: 29567494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of virtual screening against GPCR homology models: Impact of template selection and treatment of binding site plasticity.
    Jaiteh M; Rodríguez-Espigares I; Selent J; Carlsson J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Mar; 16(3):e1007680. PubMed ID: 32168319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interacting with GPCRs: Using Interaction Fingerprints for Virtual Screening.
    Lenselink EB; Jespers W; van Vlijmen HW; IJzerman AP; van Westen GJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Oct; 56(10):2053-2060. PubMed ID: 27626908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sequence, structure and ligand binding evolution of rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors: a crystal structure-based phylogenetic analysis.
    Wolf S; Grünewald S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0123533. PubMed ID: 25881057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative sequence and structural analyses of G-protein-coupled receptor crystal structures and implications for molecular models.
    Worth CL; Kleinau G; Krause G
    PLoS One; 2009 Sep; 4(9):e7011. PubMed ID: 19756152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ligand-based homology modeling as attractive tool to inspect GPCR structural plasticity.
    Moro S; Deflorian F; Bacilieri M; Spalluto G
    Curr Pharm Des; 2006; 12(17):2175-85. PubMed ID: 16796562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.