These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19291567)

  • 1. A comparison of three cervical immobilization devices.
    Hostler D; Colburn D; Seitz SR
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2009; 13(2):256-60. PubMed ID: 19291567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Soft and rigid collars provide similar restriction in cervical range of motion during fifteen activities of daily living.
    Miller CP; Bible JE; Jegede KA; Whang PG; Grauer JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(13):1271-8. PubMed ID: 20512025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Motion generated in the unstable cervical spine during the application and removal of cervical immobilization collars.
    Prasarn ML; Conrad B; Del Rossi G; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Jun; 72(6):1609-13. PubMed ID: 22695429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effectiveness of extrication collars tested during the execution of spine-board transfer techniques.
    Del Rossi G; Heffernan TP; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6):619-23. PubMed ID: 15541692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of a SAM splint-molded cervical collar with a Philadelphia cervical collar.
    McGrath T; Murphy C
    Wilderness Environ Med; 2009; 20(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 19594206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical spine motion in manual versus Jackson table turning methods in a cadaveric global instability model.
    DiPaola MJ; DiPaola CP; Conrad BP; Horodyski M; Del Rossi G; Sawers A; Bloch D; Rechtine GR
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 18525488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can an out-of-hospital cervical spine clearance protocol identify all patients with injuries? An argument for selective immobilization.
    Stroh G; Braude D
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Jun; 37(6):609-15. PubMed ID: 11385329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing range of motion to evaluate the adverse effects of ill-fitting cervical orthoses.
    Bell KM; Frazier EC; Shively CM; Hartman RA; Ulibarri JC; Lee JY; Kang JD; Donaldson WF
    Spine J; 2009 Mar; 9(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 18504164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical analysis of cervical-spine and spinal-cord-injured patients brought in without cervical spinal immobilization].
    Takahashi I; Morishita Y; Nanzaki S; Hayakawa T; Terasaka S; Nunomura M
    No Shinkei Geka; 2004 Aug; 32(8):837-42. PubMed ID: 15478650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Range-of-motion restriction and craniofacial tissue-interface pressure from four cervical collars.
    Tescher AN; Rindflesch AB; Youdas JW; Jacobson TM; Downer LL; Miers AG; Basford JR; Cullinane DC; Stevens SR; Pankratz VS; Decker PA
    J Trauma; 2007 Nov; 63(5):1120-6. PubMed ID: 17993960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Value of a rigid collar in addition to head blocks: a proof of principle study.
    Holla M
    Emerg Med J; 2012 Feb; 29(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 21335583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Effect of external cervical spine immobilization on intracranial pressure].
    Kuhnigk H; Bomke S; Sefrin P
    Aktuelle Traumatol; 1993 Dec; 23(8):350-3. PubMed ID: 8147253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of neck movement in the soft cervical collar and rigid cervical brace in healthy subjects.
    Whitcroft KL; Massouh L; Amirfeyz R; Bannister GC
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2011 Feb; 34(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 21334544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of cervical spine immobilization technique and laryngoscope blade selection on an unstable cervical spine in a cadaver model of intubation.
    Gerling MC; Davis DP; Hamilton RS; Morris GF; Vilke GM; Garfin SR; Hayden SR
    Ann Emerg Med; 2000 Oct; 36(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 11020675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the flat torso versus the elevated torso shoulder pad removal techniques in a cadaveric cervical spine instability model.
    Horodyski M; DiPaola CP; DiPaola MJ; Conrad BP; Del Rossi G; Rechtine GR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(7):687-91. PubMed ID: 19333100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prehospital spinal immobilization does not appear to be beneficial and may complicate care following gunshot injury to the torso.
    Brown JB; Bankey PE; Sangosanya AT; Cheng JD; Stassen NA; Gestring ML
    J Trauma; 2009 Oct; 67(4):774-8. PubMed ID: 19820585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the Ferno Scoop Stretcher with the long backboard for spinal immobilization.
    Krell JM; McCoy MS; Sparto PJ; Fisher GL; Stoy WA; Hostler DP
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2006; 10(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 16418091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Motion within the unstable cervical spine during patient maneuvering: the neck pivot-shift phenomenon.
    Lador R; Ben-Galim P; Hipp JA
    J Trauma; 2011 Jan; 70(1):247-50; discussion 250-1. PubMed ID: 21217496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Emergency cervical-spine immobilization.
    Chandler DR; Nemejc C; Adkins RH; Waters RL
    Ann Emerg Med; 1992 Oct; 21(10):1185-8. PubMed ID: 1416294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of efficacy and 3D kinematic characteristics of cervical orthoses.
    Zhang S; Wortley M; Clowers K; Krusenklaus JH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Mar; 20(3):264-9. PubMed ID: 15698698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.