127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19291950)
1. [Obtaining medical ethical approval for a multicentre, randomised study: prospective evaluation of a ponderous process].
Bosch FH; Klazinga NS; Schaffmeister BE
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009 Feb; 153(7):310; author reply 310. PubMed ID: 19291950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Obtaining medical ethical approval for a multicentre, randomised study: prospective evaluation of a ponderous process].
Bosch FH; Klazinga NS; Schaffmeister BE
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009 Jan; 153(4):154. PubMed ID: 19348140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Obtaining medical ethical approval for a multicentre, randomised study: prospective evaluation of a ponderous process].
van Santvoort HC; Besselink MG; Gooszen HG
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Sep; 152(38):2077-83. PubMed ID: 18837184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of the ethical review process for non-pharmacological multicentre studies in Germany on the basis of a randomised surgical trial.
Seiler CM; Kellmeyer P; Kienle P; Büchler MW; Knaebel HP;
J Med Ethics; 2007 Feb; 33(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 17264200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Unnecessary delays in ethical approval of multicentre clinical trials].
Evers JL
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Sep; 152(38):2062-4. PubMed ID: 18837181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multicentre drug trials, ethics approval and death of patients.
Millar JA
Intern Med J; 2008 Apr; 38(4):298-9; author reply 299. PubMed ID: 18380711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Trust and confidence: towards mutual acceptance of ethics committee approval of multicentre studies.
Sarson-Lawrence M; Alt C; Mok MT; Dodds M; Rosenthal MA
Intern Med J; 2004 Nov; 34(11):598-603. PubMed ID: 15546452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Global Forum for Bioethics in Research: report of a meeting.
Loff B; Hofman K; Muthuswamy V
Issues Med Ethics; 2001; 9(2):63-4. PubMed ID: 16334477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reducing the burden on many institutional review boards.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):1-2. PubMed ID: 15119341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of research ethics committees in Spain. A prospective study of 100 applications for clinical trial protocols on medicines.
Dal-Ré R; Espada J; Ortega R
J Med Ethics; 1999 Jun; 25(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 10390685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study.
Tully J; Ninis N; Booy R; Viner R
BMJ; 2000 Apr; 320(7243):1179-82. PubMed ID: 10784541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Local research ethics committees. National research ethics committee is needed.
Stone PG; Blogg CF
BMJ; 1997 Jul; 315(7099):60-1. PubMed ID: 9233351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Obtaining regulatory approval for multicentre randomised controlled trials: experiences in the STICH II trial.
Kenyon GM; Mendelow AD; Gregson BA; Rowan E
Br J Neurosurg; 2011 Jun; 25(3):352-6. PubMed ID: 21355765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reporting of ethical protection in recent oral and maxillofacial surgery research involving human subjects.
Pitak-Arnnop P; Sader R; Hervé C; Dhanuthai K; Bertrand JC; Hemprich A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 38(7):707-12. PubMed ID: 19264449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adverse effects of a multicentre system for ethics approval on the progress of a prospective multicentre trial of cancer treatment: how many patients die waiting?
Christie DR; Gabriel GS; Dear K
Intern Med J; 2007 Oct; 37(10):680-6. PubMed ID: 17894765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Advances in multicentre ethics review.
Irvine R
Intern Med J; 2008 Apr; 38(4):297-8; author reply 299. PubMed ID: 18380710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Local research ethics committee approval for a national study in Scotland.
Ah-See KW; MacKenzie J; Thakker NS; Maran AG
J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1998 Oct; 43(5):303-5. PubMed ID: 9803097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Should there be an accredited ethics committee system for centralised review of multicentre clinical research?
Cohen M
Med J Aust; 1998 May; 168(10):528. PubMed ID: 9631688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Local research ethics committees. BMA's advice about approval of clinical audit studies is confusing.
Scott PV; Pinnock CA
BMJ; 1997 Jul; 315(7099):60. PubMed ID: 9233350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Boldt debacle.
Tramèr MR
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Jun; 28(6):393-5. PubMed ID: 21540651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
