21 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19292384)
1. Outcomes of modular stem for the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fracture: a systematic review of the literature.
Cacciola G; Braconi L; Bosco F; Giustra F; Sabatini L; Capella M; De Meo F; Cavaliere P; Solarino G
Ann Jt; 2023; 8():40. PubMed ID: 38529241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of prosthesis design and implantation technique on implant stresses after cementless revision THR.
Heller MO; Mehta M; Taylor WR; Kim DY; Speirs A; Duda GN; Perka C
J Orthop Surg Res; 2011 May; 6():20. PubMed ID: 21569522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stem modularity alone is not effective in reducing dislocation rate in hip revision surgery.
Regis D; Sandri A; Bartolozzi P
J Orthop Traumatol; 2009 Dec; 10(4):167-71. PubMed ID: 19921481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early failure in total hip arthroplasty.
Dobzyniak M; Fehring TK; Odum S
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Jun; 447():76-8. PubMed ID: 16505710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mueller reinforcement rings in acetabular revision: outcome in 164 hips followed for 2-17 years.
Schlegel UJ; Bitsch RG; Pritsch M; Clauss M; Mau H; Breusch SJ
Acta Orthop; 2006 Apr; 77(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 16752284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The dual-mobility POLARCUP: first results from a multicenter study.
Bauchu P; Bonnard O; Cyprès A; Fiquet A; Girardin P; Noyer D
Orthopedics; 2008 Dec; 31(12 Suppl 2):. PubMed ID: 19298026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acetabular reinforcement ring in primary total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 10-year follow-up.
Sadri H; Pfander G; Siebenrock KA; Tannast M; Koch P; Fujita H; Ballmer P; Ganz R
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Aug; 128(8):869-77. PubMed ID: 18347806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Instability after total hip arthroplasty: treatment with large femoral heads vs constrained liners.
Sikes CV; Lai LP; Schreiber M; Mont MA; Jinnah RH; Seyler TM
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7 Suppl):59-63. PubMed ID: 18922375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative pooled survival and revision rate of Austin-Moore hip arthroplasty in published literature and arthroplasty register data.
Sadoghi P; Thaler M; Janda W; Hübl M; Leithner A; Labek G
J Arthroplasty; 2013 Sep; 28(8):1349-53. PubMed ID: 23535284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Consistent new bone formation in 95 revisions: average 9-year follow-up.
Mantelos G; Koulouvaris P; Kotsovolos H; Xenakis T
Orthopedics; 2008 Jul; 31(7):654. PubMed ID: 19292384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
