These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1929262)

  • 1. Comparison of spiral gradient and conventional agar dilution for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Wexler HM; Molitoris E; Jashnian F; Finegold SM
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1991 Jun; 35(6):1196-202. PubMed ID: 1929262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of spiral gradient endpoint and agar dilution methods for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria: a multilaboratory collaborative evaluation.
    Wexler HM; Molitoris E; Murray PR; Washington J; Zabransky RJ; Edelstein PH; Finegold SM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Jan; 34(1):170-4. PubMed ID: 8748295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modified agar dilution method for rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Hanson CW; Martin WJ
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Mar; 13(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 400819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria determined by agar dilution and by a microbroth method.
    Baron EJ; Bruckner DA
    Rev Infect Dis; 1984; 6 Suppl 1():S249-53. PubMed ID: 6718938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of anaerobic susceptibility results obtained by two methods of inoculum preparation.
    Bourgault AM; Lamothe F
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Dec; 20(6):1060-4. PubMed ID: 6520217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic organisms using the agar dilution method: comparison of three techniques.
    Wexler HM; Reeves D; Finegold SM
    Clin Ther; 1988; 10(6):747-60. PubMed ID: 3219688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determination of antimicrobial susceptibilities of clinically isolated anaerobic bacteria by E-test, ATB-ANA and agar dilution.
    Koru O; Ozyurt M
    Anaerobe; 2008 Jun; 14(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 18424192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spiral gradient endpoint method compared to standard agar dilution for susceptibility testing of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli.
    Hill GB
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 May; 29(5):975-9. PubMed ID: 2056064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Antibiotic sensitivity testing of anaerobic bacteria by the breakpoint method.
    Höffler U; Pulverer G
    Chemotherapy; 1984; 30(6):392-7. PubMed ID: 6518836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and evaluation of the spiral gradient endpoint method for susceptibility testing of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli.
    Hill GB; Schalkowsky S
    Rev Infect Dis; 1990; 12 Suppl 2():S200-9. PubMed ID: 2305183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Susceptibility testing of 7 antibiotics against anaerobic bacteria: comparison of 2 different media and carbon dioxide concentrations.
    Jansen JE; Bremmelgaard A
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B; 1987 Feb; 95(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 3105247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microbroth versus agar dilution for susceptibility testing of fluoroquinolones and other agents against anaerobic bacteria.
    Krepel CJ; Gohr CM; Edmiston CE; Condon RE
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1993 Oct; 32(4):571-5. PubMed ID: 8288498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multilaboratory comparison of anaerobe susceptibility results using 3 different agar media.
    Roe DE; Finegold SM; Citron DM; Goldstein EJ; Wexler HM; Rosenblatt JE; Cox ME; Jenkins SG; Hecht DW
    Clin Infect Dis; 2002 Sep; 35(Suppl 1):S40-6. PubMed ID: 12173107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the E test for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Citron DM; Ostovari MI; Karlsson A; Goldstein EJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Oct; 29(10):2197-203. PubMed ID: 1939571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Rosenblatt JE
    Clin Lab Med; 1989 Jun; 9(2):239-54. PubMed ID: 2659243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of E-test with agar dilution methods in testing susceptibility of N. gonorrhoeae to azithromycin.
    Yasin RM; Suan KA; Meng CY
    Sex Transm Dis; 1997 May; 24(5):257-60. PubMed ID: 9153733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methods for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Olsson-Liljequist B; Nord CE
    Clin Infect Dis; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 4():S293-6. PubMed ID: 8086578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of the E-test in evaluating the antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria of veterinary interest.
    Píriz S; Valle J; Hurtado MA; Mateos EM; Martin-Palomino P; Vadillo S
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 1995 Jun; 20(6):345-8. PubMed ID: 7786499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the E Test to agar dilution, broth microdilution, and agar diffusion susceptibility testing techniques by using a special challenge set of bacteria.
    Baker CN; Stocker SA; Culver DH; Thornsberry C
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Mar; 29(3):533-8. PubMed ID: 2037671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the E test and a reference agar dilution method for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Wüst J; Hardegger U
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992 Dec; 11(12):1169-73. PubMed ID: 1291316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.