These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1929262)

  • 21. Development of a EUCAST disk diffusion method for the susceptibility testing of rapidly growing anaerobic bacteria using Fastidious Anaerobe Agar (FAA): a development study using Bacteroides species.
    Bavelaar H; Justesen US; Morris TE; Anderson B; Copsey-Mawer S; Stubhaug TT; Kahlmeter G; Matuschek E
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2021 Nov; 27(11):1695.e1-1695.e6. PubMed ID: 33813129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in Australia.
    Chen SC; Gottlieb T; Palmer JM; Morris G; Gilbert GL
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1992 Dec; 30(6):811-20. PubMed ID: 1289355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of Clostridium difficile minimum inhibitory concentrations obtained using agar dilution vs broth microdilution methods.
    Hastey CJ; Dale SE; Nary J; Citron D; Law JH; Roe-Carpenter DE; Chesnel L
    Anaerobe; 2017 Apr; 44():73-77. PubMed ID: 28188880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of the Etest for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Rosenblatt JE; Gustafson DR
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1995 Jul; 22(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 8565417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Methodological agreement on the in vitro activity of ceftaroline against cefotaxime-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci.
    Livermore DM; Warner M; Mushtaq S
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2014 Feb; 43(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 24361355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of two media for antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria using the receiver operating characteristic procedure.
    Castel O; Grollier G; Agius G; Toullat G; de Rautlin de la Roy Y
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1990 Sep; 9(9):667-71. PubMed ID: 2226495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Inoculum preparation for anaerobic susceptibility tests.
    Murray PR; Niles AC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Sep; 18(3):733-4. PubMed ID: 6630450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Susceptibility testing of clinically isolated anaerobic bacteria by an agar dilution technique.
    Brown WJ; Waatti PE
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 Apr; 17(4):629-35. PubMed ID: 6901592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to ALP 201.
    Nord CE; Lindmark A; Persson I
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1989 Dec; 33(12):2137-9. PubMed ID: 2619278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to BAY v 3522.
    Nord CE; Rylander M; Norrby SR
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1991 Mar; 35(3):594-9. PubMed ID: 2039213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Susceptibility of Campylobacter fetus to twenty-two antimicrobial agents.
    Chow AW; Patten V; Bednorz D
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Mar; 13(3):416-8. PubMed ID: 263884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In vitro activity of ceftazidime, cefotaxime and piperacillin against multi-resistant gram-negative bacteria tested with a modified agar dilution method.
    Hoogkamp-Korstanje JA; Meijer CA
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Jun; 1(3):166-70. PubMed ID: 6293813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development of EUCAST disk diffusion method for susceptibility testing of the Bacteroides fragilis group isolates.
    Nagy E; Justesen US; Eitel Z; Urbán E;
    Anaerobe; 2015 Feb; 31():65-71. PubMed ID: 25464140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of susceptibility results of anaerobic organisms determined by agar dilution method and Sceptor Anaerobe MIC/ID Micro Broth Dilution Panels.
    Hussain Z; Lannigan R; Schieven BC; Stoakes L; Groves D
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1987 Oct; 8(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 3427890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. E test versus agar dilution for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of viridans group streptococci.
    Rosser SJ; Alfa MJ; Hoban S; Kennedy J; Harding GK
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jan; 37(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 9854058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of agar dilution, tube dilution, and broth microdilution susceptibility tests for determination of ramoplanin MICs.
    Kenny MT; Brackman MA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 May; 32(5):1364-5. PubMed ID: 8051270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of the Etest with agar dilution for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Haemophilus ducreyi.
    Lagergård T; Frisk A; Trollfors B
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1996 Nov; 38(5):849-52. PubMed ID: 8961054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of BSAC agar dilution and NCCLS broth microdilution MIC methods for in vitro susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis: the BSAC Respiratory Resistance Surveillance Programme.
    Reynolds R; Shackcloth J; Felmingham D; MacGowan A;
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2003 Dec; 52(6):925-30. PubMed ID: 14585864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cefotetan susceptibility testing against anaerobic bacteria from obstetrical and gynecologic sources: comparison of five different methods.
    Maccato M; Riddle G; Faro S
    Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol; 1993; 1(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 18476201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative activity of several beta-lactam antibiotics against anaerobes determined by two methods.
    Zabransky RJ; Birk RJ
    Clin Ther; 1987; 10(1):107-25. PubMed ID: 3450391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.