These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19292630)

  • 1. Integrating scientific evidence to support telehomecare development in a remote region.
    Gagnon MP; Duplantie J; Fortin JP; Lamothe L; Légaré F; Labrecque M
    Telemed J E Health; 2009 Mar; 15(2):195-8. PubMed ID: 19292630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rural emergency care 360°: mobilising healthcare professionals, decision-makers, patients and citizens to improve rural emergency care in the province of Quebec, Canada: a qualitative study protocol.
    Fleet R; Dupuis G; Fortin JP; Gravel J; Ouimet M; Poitras J; Légaré F
    BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e016039. PubMed ID: 28819068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An integrated strategy of knowledge application for optimal e-health implementation: a multi-method study protocol.
    Gagnon MP; Légaré F; Fortin JP; Lamothe L; Labrecque M; Duplantie J
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Apr; 8():17. PubMed ID: 18435853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A multi-level qualitative analysis of Telehomecare in Ontario: challenges and opportunities.
    Hunting G; Shahid N; Sahakyan Y; Fan I; Moneypenny CR; Stanimirovic A; North T; Petrosyan Y; Krahn MD; Rac VE
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Dec; 15():544. PubMed ID: 26645639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What supports do health system organizations have in place to facilitate evidence-informed decision-making? A qualitative study.
    Ellen ME; Léon G; Bouchard G; Lavis JN; Ouimet M; Grimshaw JM
    Implement Sci; 2013 Aug; 8():84. PubMed ID: 23915278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Barriers, facilitators and views about next steps to implementing supports for evidence-informed decision-making in health systems: a qualitative study.
    Ellen ME; Léon G; Bouchard G; Ouimet M; Grimshaw JM; Lavis JN
    Implement Sci; 2014 Dec; 9():179. PubMed ID: 25476735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving delivery of care in rural emergency departments: a qualitative pilot study mobilizing health professionals, decision-makers and citizens in Baie-Saint-Paul and the Magdalen Islands, Québec, Canada.
    Fleet R; Turgeon-Pelchat C; Smithman MA; Alami H; Fortin JP; Poitras J; Ouellet J; Gravel J; Renaud MP; Dupuis G; Légaré F
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Jan; 20(1):62. PubMed ID: 31996193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence-informed decision-making by professionals working in addiction agencies serving women: a descriptive qualitative study.
    Jack SM; Dobbins M; Sword W; Novotna G; Brooks S; Lipman EL; Niccols A
    Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2011 Nov; 6():29. PubMed ID: 22059528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of clinical and health services research projects on decision-making: a qualitative study.
    Solans-Domènech M; Adam P; Guillamón I; Permanyer-Miralda G; Pons JM; Escarrabill J
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2013 May; 11():15. PubMed ID: 23663364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Challenges of a Complex and Innovative Telehealth Project: A Qualitative Evaluation of the Eastern Quebec Telepathology Network.
    Alami H; Fortin JP; Gagnon MP; Pollender H; Têtu B; Tanguay F
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2018 May; 7(5):421-432. PubMed ID: 29764106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bridging the gap between the economic evaluation literature and daily practice in occupational health: a qualitative study among decision-makers in the healthcare sector.
    van Dongen JM; Tompa E; Clune L; Sarnocinska-Hart A; Bongers PM; van Tulder MW; van der Beek AJ; van Wier MF
    Implement Sci; 2013 Jun; 8():57. PubMed ID: 23731570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patchy 'coherence': using normalization process theory to evaluate a multi-faceted shared decision making implementation program (MAGIC).
    Lloyd A; Joseph-Williams N; Edwards A; Rix A; Elwyn G
    Implement Sci; 2013 Sep; 8():102. PubMed ID: 24006959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health system decision-makers at the helm of implementation research: development of a framework to evaluate the processes and effectiveness of embedded approaches.
    Varallyay NI; Langlois EV; Tran N; Elias V; Reveiz L
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2020 Jun; 18(1):64. PubMed ID: 32522238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How does context influence collaborative decision-making for health services planning, delivery and evaluation?
    Gagliardi AR; Webster F; Brouwers MC; Baxter NN; Finelli A; Gallinger S
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2014 Nov; 14():545. PubMed ID: 25407487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A prospective multiple case study of the impact of emerging scientific evidence on established colorectal cancer screening programs: a study protocol.
    Geddie H; Dobrow MJ; Hoch JS; Rabeneck L
    Implement Sci; 2012 Jun; 7():51. PubMed ID: 22656648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methods of a multi-faceted rapid knowledge synthesis project to inform the implementation of a new health service model: Collaborative Emergency Centres.
    Hayden JA; Killian L; Zygmunt A; Babineau J; Martin-Misener R; Jensen JL; Carter AJ
    Syst Rev; 2015 Jan; 4(1):7. PubMed ID: 25588468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Public health decision-makers' informational needs and preferences for receiving research evidence.
    Dobbins M; Jack S; Thomas H; Kothari A
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2007; 4(3):156-63. PubMed ID: 17850496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How is the use of research evidence in health policy perceived? A comparison between the reporting of researchers and policy-makers.
    Ellen ME; Lavis JN; Horowitz E; Berglas R
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2018 Jul; 16(1):64. PubMed ID: 30029647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.