These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19293095)

  • 1. Nonautomatic emotion perception in a dual-task situation.
    Tomasik D; Ruthruff E; Allen PA; Lien MC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):282-8. PubMed ID: 19293095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning to bypass the central bottleneck: declining automaticity with advancing age.
    Maquestiaux F; Laguë-Beauvais M; Ruthruff E; Hartley A; Bherer L
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Mar; 25(1):177-92. PubMed ID: 20230138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Global-local processing and dispositional bias interact with emotion processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Kerusauskaite SG; Simione L; Raffone A; Srinivasan N
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Feb; 238(2):345-354. PubMed ID: 31925476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment.
    Maquestiaux F; Laguë-Beauvais M; Ruthruff E; Bherer L
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1262-82. PubMed ID: 18927042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Task relevance of emotional information affects anxiety-linked attention bias in visual search.
    Dodd HF; Vogt J; Turkileri N; Notebaert L
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Jan; 122():13-20. PubMed ID: 26844869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does size rescaling require central attention?
    Tombu M; Jolicoeur P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Mar; 56(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 11901957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of temporal unpredictability for process interference and code overlap in perception-action dual tasks.
    Koch I; Metin B; Schuch S
    Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):244-52. PubMed ID: 12684780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual-task interference on left eye utilization during facial emotion perception.
    Duncan J; Dugas G; Brisson B; Blais C; Fiset D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1319-1330. PubMed ID: 31259582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emergent perceptual features in the benefit of consistent stimulus-response mappings on dual-task performance.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):468-83. PubMed ID: 16215745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating dual-task interference in children versus young adults with the overlapping task paradigm.
    Strobach T; Karbach J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Sep; 197():104866. PubMed ID: 32531496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discrimination of face gender and expression under dual-task conditions.
    García-Gutiérrez A; Aguado L; Romero-Ferreiro V; Pérez-Moreno E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):614-627. PubMed ID: 27878558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrophysiological evidence for adult age-related sparing and decrements in emotion perception and attention.
    Pollock JW; Khoja N; Kaut KP; Lien MC; Allen PA
    Front Integr Neurosci; 2012; 6():60. PubMed ID: 22936901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A neuropsychological assessment of dual-task costs in closed-head injury patients using Cohen's effect size estimation method.
    Dell'Acqua R; Sessa P; Pashler H
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):553-61. PubMed ID: 16142490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceived facial expressions of emotion as motivational incentives: evidence from a differential implicit learning paradigm.
    Schultheiss OC; Pang JS; Torges CM; Wirth MM; Treynor W; Derryberry D
    Emotion; 2005 Mar; 5(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 15755218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ideomotor compatibility enables automatic response selection.
    Maquestiaux F; Lyphout-Spitz M; Ruthruff E; Arexis M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Aug; 27(4):742-750. PubMed ID: 32323163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A signal-detection analysis of sex differences in the perception of emotional faces.
    Grimshaw GM; Bulman-Fleming MB; Ngo C
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Apr; 54(3):248-50. PubMed ID: 15050785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anxiety modulates the degree of attentive resources required to process emotional faces.
    Fox E; Russo R; Georgiou GA
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 5(4):396-404. PubMed ID: 16541810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissociating central and auditory attention: Is there a shared bottleneck for response selection and auditory search?
    Kattner F; Reimer CB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Oct; 73(10):1564-1574. PubMed ID: 32419615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is cross-modal integration of emotional expressions independent of attentional resources?
    Vroomen J; Driver J; de Gelder B
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2001 Dec; 1(4):382-7. PubMed ID: 12467089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.