These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19293104)

  • 1. How many exemplars are used? Explorations with the Rex Leopold I model.
    De Schryver M; Vandist K; Rosseel Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):337-43. PubMed ID: 19293104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulus range and discontinuity effects on information-integration category learning and generalization.
    Maddox WT; Filoteo JV
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1279-95. PubMed ID: 21327747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A rule-based presentation order facilitates category learning.
    Mathy F; Feldman J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Dec; 16(6):1050-7. PubMed ID: 19966254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In search of abstraction: the varying abstraction model of categorization.
    Vanpaemel W; Storms G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Aug; 15(4):732-49. PubMed ID: 18792499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rule-based extrapolation: a continuing challenge for exemplar models.
    Denton SE; Kruschke JK; Erickson MA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Aug; 15(4):780-6. PubMed ID: 18792504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experience-based and on-line categorization of objects in early infancy.
    Bornstein MH; Mash C
    Child Dev; 2010; 81(3):884-97. PubMed ID: 20573111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The exemplar interleaving effect in inductive learning: moderation by the difficulty of category discriminations.
    Zulkiply N; Burt JS
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Jan; 41(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 22886736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two pathways to stimulus encoding in category learning?
    Davis T; Love BC; Maddox WT
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jun; 37(4):394-413. PubMed ID: 19460948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What does it look like and what can it do? Category structure influences how infants categorize.
    Horst JS; Oakes LM; Madole KL
    Child Dev; 2005; 76(3):614-31. PubMed ID: 15892782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combining exemplar-based category representations and connectionist learning rules.
    Nosofsky RM; Kruschke JK; McKinley SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Mar; 18(2):211-33. PubMed ID: 1532819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Putting the psychology back into psychological models: mechanistic versus rational approaches.
    Sakamoto Y; Jones M; Love BC
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1057-65. PubMed ID: 18927024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrating episodic memories and prior knowledge at multiple levels of abstraction.
    Hemmer P; Steyvers M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 19145014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of category representations on exemplar generation.
    Wang M; Xie L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(9):1851-60. PubMed ID: 26275023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Further tests of an exemplar-similarity approach to relating identification and categorization.
    Nosofsky RM
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Apr; 45(4):279-90. PubMed ID: 2710628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A probabilistic account of exemplar and category generation.
    Jern A; Kemp C
    Cogn Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):85-125. PubMed ID: 23108001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hierarchical encoding in visual working memory: ensemble statistics bias memory for individual items.
    Brady TF; Alvarez GA
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Mar; 22(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 21296808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of similarity and practice on speeded classification response times and accuracies: further tests of an exemplar-retrieval model.
    Nosofsky RM; Alfonso-Reese LA
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):78-93. PubMed ID: 10087858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison processes in category learning: from theory to behavior.
    Hammer R; Bar-Hillel A; Hertz T; Weinshall D; Hochstein S
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1225():102-18. PubMed ID: 18614160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unsupervised categorization and category learning.
    Pothos EM; Chater N
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 May; 58(4):733-52. PubMed ID: 16104104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prototypes in category learning: the effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity.
    Minda JP; Smith JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):775-99. PubMed ID: 11394680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.