136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19293526)
1. Pap smear.
Mehta V; Vasanth V; Balachandran C
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2009; 75(2):214-6. PubMed ID: 19293526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Pap smear refined.
Oncology (Williston Park); 1997 Aug; 11(8):1125. PubMed ID: 9268975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Update on the Papanicolaou smear: new issues for the 1990s.
Ollayos CW
Mil Med; 1997 Aug; 162(8):521-3. PubMed ID: 9271901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The current status of the Papanicolaou smear.
Shingleton HM; Patrick RL; Johnston WW; Smith RA
CA Cancer J Clin; 1995; 45(5):305-20. PubMed ID: 7656133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. When your patient asks: "Doctor, I read there have been serious Pap smear errors. Shouldn't I get one of those new computer Pap smears?".
Boronow RC; Cavett JR
J Miss State Med Assoc; 1998 Apr; 39(4):136-41. PubMed ID: 9585689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Pap smear: take two.
Shulman JJ; Hontz A; Sedlis A; Walters AT; Balin H; LoScuito L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Apr; 121(8):1024-8. PubMed ID: 1119496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. George Papanicolaou (1883-1962): Discoverer of the Pap smear.
Tan SY; Tatsumura Y
Singapore Med J; 2015 Oct; 56(10):586-7. PubMed ID: 26512152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Pap smears. Still a reliable screening tool for cervical cancer.
Stack PS
Postgrad Med; 1997 Apr; 101(4):207-8, 211-4. PubMed ID: 9126213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A decade has passed...the Pap smear and cervical cancer.
Linder J
Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Nov; 108(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 9353086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Bethesda system and evaluation of abnormal pap smears.
Nguyen HN; Nordqvist SR
Semin Surg Oncol; 1999; 16(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 10225298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Management of the abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Appleby J
Med Clin North Am; 1995 Mar; 79(2):345-60. PubMed ID: 7877395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cervical pap smears: techniques and clinical significance].
Lambert C
Rev Med Liege; 1999 Apr; 54(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 10389474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Procedures of rapid rescreening of Pap smears.
Mania E; Placidi A; Manca G
Cytopathology; 2001 Dec; 12(6):410. PubMed ID: 11843944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The adequate Papanicolaou smear revisited.
Greening SE
Diagn Cytopathol; 1985; 1(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 3836072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro adjuncts to the pap smear.
Felix JC; Amezcua C
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2002 Dec; 29(4):685-99, vii. PubMed ID: 12509092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pap smears and screening for cervical neoplasia.
Wilkinson EJ
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Dec; 33(4):817-25. PubMed ID: 2289348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Pap smear intervals safe.
AIDS Patient Care STDS; 2000 Dec; 14(12):675. PubMed ID: 11119436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of gel lubricant on cervical cytology.
Charoenkwan K; Ninunanahaeminda K; Khunamornpong S; Srisomboon J; Thorner PS
Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(6):654-8. PubMed ID: 19068667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Pap smear is a cancer screening test: why not put the screening error rate in the report?
Robb J
Diagn Cytopathol; 1993 Oct; 9(5):485-6. PubMed ID: 8054009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving the accuracy of Pap smears.
Evans TC
Postgrad Med; 1997 Sep; 102(3):63. PubMed ID: 9300017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]