194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19294402)
21. Use of 3D surface scanning to match facial shapes against altered exhumed remains in a context of forensic individual identification.
Charlier P; Froesch P; Huynh-Charlier I; Fort A; Hurel A; Jullien F
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2014 Dec; 10(4):654-61. PubMed ID: 25326680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Perspective distortion tolerances and skull-face registration in craniofacial superimposition: an analytical review.
Healy SS; Stephan CN
Int J Legal Med; 2023 Nov; 137(6):1767-1776. PubMed ID: 37702755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Geometric morphometric methods for bone reconstruction: the mandibular condylar process of Pico della Mirandola.
Benazzi S; Stansfield E; Kullmer O; Fiorenza L; Gruppioni G
Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2009 Aug; 292(8):1088-97. PubMed ID: 19645014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. New technique in facial reconstruction: the case of Giovanni Battista Morgagni.
Zanatta A; Bezzi L; Carrara N; Moraes C; Thiene G; Zampieri F
Anthropol Anz; 2018 May; 75(2):131-140. PubMed ID: 29542801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reconstruction of the late Pleistocene human skull from Hofmeyr, South Africa.
Grine FE; Gunz P; Betti-Nash L; Neubauer S; Morris AG
J Hum Evol; 2010 Jul; 59(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 20546848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Superimposition and reconstruction in forensic facial identification: a survey.
Aulsebrook WA; Işcan MY; Slabbert JH; Becker P
Forensic Sci Int; 1995 Oct; 75(2-3):101-20. PubMed ID: 8586334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Conceptual transitions in methods of skull-photo superimposition that impact the reliability of identification: a review.
Jayaprakash PT
Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Jan; 246():110-21. PubMed ID: 25498986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Tests of one Brazilian facial reconstruction method using three soft tissue depth sets and familiar assessors.
Fernandes CM; Serra Mda C; da Silva JV; Noritomi PY; Pereira FD; Melani RF
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jan; 214(1-3):211.e1-7. PubMed ID: 21937172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Is characterizing the digital forensic facial reconstruction with hair necessary? A familiar assessors' analysis.
Fernandes CM; Pereira FD; da Silva JV; Serra Mda C
Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jun; 229(1-3):164.e1-5. PubMed ID: 23622792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Validation of a computer modelled forensic facial reconstruction technique using CT data from live subjects: a pilot study.
Short LJ; Khambay B; Ayoub A; Erolin C; Rynn C; Wilkinson C
Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Apr; 237():147.e1-147.e8. PubMed ID: 24529418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The computer-aided facial reconstruction system.
Miyasaka S; Yoshino M; Imaizumi K; Seta S
Forensic Sci Int; 1995 Jun; 74(1-2):155-65. PubMed ID: 7665128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Anthropological facial approximation in three dimensions (AFA3D): computer-assisted estimation of the facial morphology using geometric morphometrics.
Guyomarc'h P; Dutailly B; Charton J; Santos F; Desbarats P; Coqueugniot H
J Forensic Sci; 2014 Nov; 59(6):1502-16. PubMed ID: 25088006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reliability of Craniofacial Superimposition Using Three-Dimension Skull Model.
Gaudio D; Olivieri L; De Angelis D; Poppa P; Galassi A; Cattaneo C
J Forensic Sci; 2016 Jan; 61(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 26335587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Technical note: virtual reconstruction of KNM-ER 1813 Homo habilis cranium.
Benazzi S; Gruppioni G; Strait DS; Hublin JJ
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2014 Jan; 153(1):154-60. PubMed ID: 24318950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Computer-assisted skull identification system using video superimposition.
Yoshino M; Matsuda H; Kubota S; Imaizumi K; Miyasaka S; Seta S
Forensic Sci Int; 1997 Dec; 90(3):231-44. PubMed ID: 9493339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A new experimental approach to computer-aided face/skull identification in forensic anthropology.
Ricci A; Marella GL; Apostol MA
Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2006 Mar; 27(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 16501348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An accuracy assessment of forensic computerized facial reconstruction employing cone-beam computed tomography from live subjects.
Lee WJ; Wilkinson CM; Hwang HS
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):318-27. PubMed ID: 22073932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Estimating the Skull-to-Camera Distance from Facial Photographs for Craniofacial Superimposition.
Stephan CN
J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jul; 62(4):850-860. PubMed ID: 28097661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An investigation into the accuracy and reliability of skull-photo superimposition in a South African sample.
Gordon GM; Steyn M
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Mar; 216(1-3):198.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22024654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Virtual reconstruction of modern and fossil hominoid crania: consequences of reference sample choice.
Senck S; Bookstein FL; Benazzi S; Kastner J; Weber GW
Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2015 May; 298(5):827-41. PubMed ID: 25689596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
