These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

421 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19295396)

  • 1. Measurement of systolic pressure variation during graded volume loss using simple tools on Datex Ohmeda S/5 monitor.
    Durga P; Jonnavittula N; Muthuchellappan R; Ramachandran G
    J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2009 Apr; 21(2):161-4. PubMed ID: 19295396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validity of pulse pressure and systolic blood pressure variation data obtained from a Datex Ohmeda S/5 monitor for predicting fluid responsiveness during surgery.
    Qiao H; Zhang J; Liang WM
    J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2010 Oct; 22(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 20622685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.
    Huang CC; Fu JY; Hu HC; Kao KC; Chen NH; Hsieh MJ; Tsai YH
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated pre-ejection period variation predicts fluid responsiveness in low tidal volume ventilated pigs.
    Vistisen ST; Koefoed-Nielsen J; Larsson A
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2010 Feb; 54(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 19681786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of sternotomy on heart-lung interaction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery receiving pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation.
    De Blasi RA; Palmisani S; Cigognetti L; Iasenzaniro M; Arcioni R; Mercieri M; Pinto G
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Apr; 51(4):441-6. PubMed ID: 17378782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The intrathoracic blood volume index as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients with acute circulatory failure: a comparison with central venous pressure.
    Muller L; Louart G; Bengler C; Fabbro-Peray P; Carr J; Ripart J; de La Coussaye JE; Lefrant JY
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Aug; 107(2):607-13. PubMed ID: 18633040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of arterial systolic pressure variation with other clinical parameters to predict the response to fluid challenges during cardiac surgery.
    Bennett-Guerrero E; Kahn RA; Moskowitz DM; Falcucci O; Bodian CA
    Mt Sinai J Med; 2002; 69(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 11832979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of cardiac preload status by pulse pressure variation in patients after anesthesia induction: comparison with central venous pressure and initial distribution volume of glucose.
    He Z; Qiao H; Zhou W; Wang Y; Xu Z; Che X; Zhang J; Liang W
    J Anesth; 2011 Dec; 25(6):812-7. PubMed ID: 21935687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of functional hemodynamic parameters in predicting fluid responsiveness with pulse power analysis in surgical patients.
    Cecconi M; Monti G; Hamilton MA; Puntis M; Dawson D; Tuccillo ML; Della Rocca G; Grounds RM; Rhodes A
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2012 May; 78(5):527-33. PubMed ID: 22534733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relative value of pressures and volumes in assessing fluid responsiveness after valvular and coronary artery surgery.
    Breukers RM; Trof RJ; de Wilde RB; van den Berg PC; Twisk JW; Jansen JR; Groeneveld J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 18835782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness following coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Kramer A; Zygun D; Hawes H; Easton P; Ferland A
    Chest; 2004 Nov; 126(5):1563-8. PubMed ID: 15539728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of stop-cursor method for determining systolic and pulse pressure variation.
    Tyler L; Greco S; Bridges E; Barnes S; Brown L; Green KG; Wolfson D
    Am J Crit Care; 2013 Jul; 22(4):298-305. PubMed ID: 23817818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Assessment of stroke volume variation and intrathoracic blood volume index on the responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated canine with hemorrhagic shock].
    Liu SQ; Qiu HB; Yang Y; Chen YM; Li JQ; Shen JF
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Sep; 44(17):1216-9. PubMed ID: 17147872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ventilation-induced plethysmographic variations predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated postoperative cardiac surgery patients.
    Wyffels PA; Durnez PJ; Helderweirt J; Stockman WM; De Kegel D
    Anesth Analg; 2007 Aug; 105(2):448-52. PubMed ID: 17646504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of pulse pressure variation to estimate changes in preload during experimental acute normovolemic hemodilution.
    Sant'Ana AJ; Otsuki DA; Noel-Morgan J; Leite VF; Fantoni DT; Abrahao Hajjar L; Barbosa Gomes Galas FR; Pinheiro De Almeida J; Fukushima J; Costa Auler JO
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2012 Apr; 78(4):426-33. PubMed ID: 22240618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of fluid-responsiveness parameters for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison among LiDCO, transesophageal echochardiography, and pulmonary artery catheter.
    Belloni L; Pisano A; Natale A; Piccirillo MR; Piazza L; Ismeno G; De Martino G
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2008 Apr; 22(2):243-8. PubMed ID: 18375327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of elevated PEEP on dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness in a pediatric animal model.
    Renner J; Gruenewald M; Meybohm P; Hedderich J; Steinfath M; Scholz J; Bein B
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Dec; 18(12):1170-7. PubMed ID: 19076570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pulse-pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness during heart displacement for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Lee JH; Jeon Y; Bahk JH; Gil NS; Kim KB; Hong DM; Kim HJ
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Dec; 25(6):1056-62. PubMed ID: 21924634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional haemodynamic monitoring: The value of SVV as measured by the LiDCORapid™ in predicting fluid responsiveness in high risk vascular surgical patients.
    Willars C; Dada A; Hughes T; Green D
    Int J Surg; 2012; 10(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 22330275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cuff-occluded rate of rise of peripheral venous pressure: a new, highly sensitive technique for monitoring blood volume status during hemorrhage and resuscitation.
    Wolf WM; Snyder CL; Porter J; Saltzman DA; Chen S; Leonard AS
    Surgery; 1987 Mar; 101(3):304-9. PubMed ID: 3824158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.