These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19296437)

  • 1. Biotech regulation in India: problems and promises.
    Reddy KI
    Biotechnol J; 2009 Mar; 4(3):306-9. PubMed ID: 19296437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agbiotech issues climb US political agenda.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Dec; 20(12):1179-80. PubMed ID: 12454658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Agricultural biotechnology in India: prospects and challenges.
    Tuli R; Sawant SV; Trivedi PK; Singh PK; Nath P
    Biotechnol J; 2009 Mar; 4(3):319-28. PubMed ID: 19253323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Will we reap what biopharming sows?
    Miller HI
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May; 21(5):480-1. PubMed ID: 12721561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. No more catch-up.
    Nature; 2009 Apr; 458(7241):946. PubMed ID: 19396092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. US-Indian agbiotech deal under scrutiny.
    Jayaraman KS
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 May; 24(5):481. PubMed ID: 16680115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EPA's proposed biotech policy turns a deaf ear to science.
    Fedoroff N; Haselkorn R; Chassy BM
    FASEB J; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2855-7. PubMed ID: 21880667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Agbiotech. Report says India needs stronger, independent regulatory body.
    Bagla P
    Science; 2004 Jun; 304(5677):1579. PubMed ID: 15192187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biotech as Bush bows out.
    Lorenzo A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Jan; 26(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 18183006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fatal flaws in agbiotech regulatory policies.
    McHughen A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jul; 25(7):725-7. PubMed ID: 17621292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Science debate. Scientists clash swords over future of GM food crops in India.
    Bagla P; Stone R
    Science; 2013 May; 340(6132):539-40. PubMed ID: 23641086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New Zealand backs GM technologies.
    Norrie C
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):792. PubMed ID: 11533620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Compliance costs for regulatory approval of new biotech crops.
    Kalaitzandonakes N; Alston JM; Bradford KJ
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 May; 25(5):509-11. PubMed ID: 17483830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biotech boom.
    Jayaraman KS
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Sep; 23(9):1183-4. PubMed ID: 16151411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Organic farmers sue GMO producers.
    Bouchie A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Mar; 20(3):210. PubMed ID: 11875406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. EU plans to label and trace GMOs.
    Dorey E
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):795. PubMed ID: 11533623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auf Wiedersehen, agbiotech.
    Miller HI
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):974-5. PubMed ID: 18779798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why technology-based regulations don't work.
    Mayer S
    Nat Biotechnol; 1996 Dec; 14(13):1630. PubMed ID: 9634831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. BIOCENTURY, outrunner of China's biological technology in agriculture Biocentury Transgene (China) Co., Ltd.
    Cui H; Huang T
    Biotechnol J; 2006 Nov; 1(11):1203-4. PubMed ID: 17109490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Left in the dust of the campaign trail.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Nov; 18(11):1119. PubMed ID: 11062387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.