These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19297045)

  • 1. Bayesian estimation of variance partition coefficients adjusted for imperfect test sensitivity and specificity.
    Kostoulas P; Leontides L; Browne WJ; Gardner IA
    Prev Vet Med; 2009 Jun; 89(3-4):155-62. PubMed ID: 19297045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of diagnostic testing error on intracluster correlation coefficient estimation.
    Branscum AJ; Gardner IA; Wagner BA; McInturff PS; Salman MD
    Prev Vet Med; 2005 Jun; 69(1-2):63-75. PubMed ID: 15899297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian modeling of animal- and herd-level prevalences.
    Branscum AJ; Gardner IA; Johnson WO
    Prev Vet Med; 2004 Dec; 66(1-4):101-12. PubMed ID: 15579338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of methods to estimate the prevalence of ovine Johne's infection from pooled faecal samples.
    Toribio JA; Sergeant ES
    Aust Vet J; 2007 Aug; 85(8):317-24. PubMed ID: 17685977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the interpretation of test sensitivity in the two-test two-population problem: assumptions matter.
    Johnson WO; Gardner IA; Metoyer CN; Branscum AJ
    Prev Vet Med; 2009 Oct; 91(2-4):116-21. PubMed ID: 19651450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of sample sizes for pooled faecal sampling for detection of Salmonella in pigs.
    Arnold ME; Cook AJ
    Epidemiol Infect; 2009 Dec; 137(12):1734-41. PubMed ID: 19416556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exact confidence limits for prevalence of a disease with an imperfect diagnostic test.
    Reiczigel J; Földi J; Ozsvári L
    Epidemiol Infect; 2010 Nov; 138(11):1674-8. PubMed ID: 20196903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitivity and specificity of the agar-gel-immunodiffusion test, ELISA and the skin test for detection of paratuberculosis in United States Midwest sheep populations.
    Robbe-Austerman S; Gardner IA; Thomsen BV; Morrical DG; Martin BM; Palmer MV; Thoen CO; Ewing C
    Vet Res; 2006; 37(4):553-64. PubMed ID: 16641016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of diagnostic-test sensitivity and specificity through Bayesian modeling.
    Branscum AJ; Gardner IA; Johnson WO
    Prev Vet Med; 2005 May; 68(2-4):145-63. PubMed ID: 15820113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of the diagnostic accuracy of the invA-gene-based PCR technique and a bacteriological culture for the detection of Salmonella spp. in caecal content from slaughtered pigs using Bayesian analysis.
    Mainar-Jaime RC; Atashparvar N; Chirino-Trejo M
    Zoonoses Public Health; 2008; 55(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 18234030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of two commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the detection of antibodies to Salmonella spp. in slaughter pigs from Canada.
    Mainar-Jaime RC; Atashparvar N; Chirino-Trejo M; Blasco JM
    Prev Vet Med; 2008 Jun; 85(1-2):41-51. PubMed ID: 18243377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size estimation to substantiate freedom from disease for clustered binary data with a specific risk profile.
    Kostoulas P; Nielsen SS; Browne WJ; Leontides L
    Epidemiol Infect; 2013 Jun; 141(6):1318-27. PubMed ID: 22954371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian sample size determination for prevalence and diagnostic test studies in the absence of a gold standard test.
    Dendukuri N; Rahme E; Bélisle P; Joseph L
    Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):388-97. PubMed ID: 15180664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian adjustment for covariate measurement errors: a flexible parametric approach.
    Hossain S; Gustafson P
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(11):1580-600. PubMed ID: 19226564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modelling risk when binary outcomes are subject to error.
    McInturff P; Johnson WO; Cowling D; Gardner IA
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(7):1095-109. PubMed ID: 15057880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling disease-state transition heterogeneity through Bayesian variable selection.
    Healy BC; Engler D
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1353-68. PubMed ID: 19206077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A model selection approach to analysis of variance and covariance.
    Alber SA; Weiss RE
    Stat Med; 2009 Jun; 28(13):1821-40. PubMed ID: 19387975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian semiparametric ROC curve estimation and disease diagnosis.
    Branscum AJ; Johnson WO; Hanson TE; Gardner IA
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2474-96. PubMed ID: 18300333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Confidence in polymerase chain reaction diagnosis can be improved by Bayesian estimation of post-test disease probability.
    Kelly P; Pereira-Maxwell F; Carnaby S; White I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 15718114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strategies for two-stage sampling designs for estimating herd-level prevalence.
    Wagner B; Salman MD
    Prev Vet Med; 2004 Dec; 66(1-4):1-17. PubMed ID: 15579331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.