175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19297199)
1. Survival of the glenoid component in shoulder arthroplasty.
Fox TJ; Cil A; Sperling JW; Sanchez-Sotelo J; Schleck CD; Cofield RH
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2009; 18(6):859-63. PubMed ID: 19297199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Survivorship of the humeral component in shoulder arthroplasty.
Cil A; Veillette CJ; Sanchez-Sotelo J; Sperling JW; Schleck CD; Cofield RH
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2010 Jan; 19(1):143-50. PubMed ID: 19556148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term results of cemented metal-backed glenoid components for osteoarthritis of the shoulder.
Tammachote N; Sperling JW; Vathana T; Cofield RH; Harmsen WS; Schleck CD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Jan; 91(1):160-6. PubMed ID: 19122091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Total shoulder arthroplasty with a metal-backed, bone-ingrowth glenoid component. Medium to long-term results.
Taunton MJ; McIntosh AL; Sperling JW; Cofield RH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Oct; 90(10):2180-8. PubMed ID: 18829916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stability of cemented in-line pegged glenoid compared with keeled glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Rahme H; Mattsson P; Wikblad L; Nowak J; Larsson S
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Aug; 91(8):1965-72. PubMed ID: 19651956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The association between glenoid component design and revision risk in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.
Dillon MT; Chan PH; Prentice HA; Burfeind WE; Yian EH; Singh A; Paxton EW; Navarro RA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2089-2096. PubMed ID: 32507730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiographic and clinical comparison of pegged and keeled glenoid components using modern cementing techniques: midterm results of a prospective randomized study.
Kilian CM; Press CM; Smith KM; O'Connor DP; Morris BJ; Elkousy HA; Gartsman GM; Edwards TB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Dec; 26(12):2078-2085. PubMed ID: 28918112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Survival of the pegged glenoid component in shoulder arthroplasty: part II.
McLendon PB; Schoch BS; Sperling JW; Sánchez-Sotelo J; Schleck CD; Cofield RH
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Aug; 26(8):1469-1476. PubMed ID: 28161240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cemented polyethylene versus uncemented metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study.
Boileau P; Avidor C; Krishnan SG; Walch G; Kempf JF; Molé D
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2002; 11(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 12195253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Polyethylene insert exchange for wear after total shoulder arthroplasty.
Cheung EV; Sperling JW; Cofield RH
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2007; 16(5):574-8. PubMed ID: 17531512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiographic survival in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Fox TJ; Foruria AM; Klika BJ; Sperling JW; Schleck CD; Cofield RH
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Sep; 22(9):1221-7. PubMed ID: 23473606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiographic and computed tomography analysis of cemented pegged polyethylene glenoid components in total shoulder replacement.
Yian EH; Werner CM; Nyffeler RW; Pfirrmann CW; Ramappa A; Sukthankar A; Gerber C
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Sep; 87(9):1928-36. PubMed ID: 16140806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty in young patients with osteoarthritis: all-polyethylene versus metal-backed glenoid.
Gauci MO; Bonnevialle N; Moineau G; Baba M; Walch G; Boileau P
Bone Joint J; 2018 Apr; 100-B(4):485-492. PubMed ID: 29629579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. No differences in early results of a hybrid glenoid compared with a pegged implant.
Gulotta LV; Chambers KL; Warren RF; Dines DM; Craig EV
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3918-24. PubMed ID: 26354176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiographic comparison of pegged and keeled glenoid components using modern cementing techniques: a prospective randomized study.
Edwards TB; Labriola JE; Stanley RJ; O'Connor DP; Elkousy HA; Gartsman GM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2010 Mar; 19(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 20185072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pegged versus keeled glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Throckmorton TW; Zarkadas PC; Sperling JW; Cofield RH
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2010 Jul; 19(5):726-33. PubMed ID: 20149974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fully uncemented glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty.
De Wilde L; Dayerizadeh N; De Neve F; Basamania C; Van Tongel A
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Oct; 22(10):e1-7. PubMed ID: 23619247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reimplantation of a glenoid component following component removal and allogenic bone-grafting.
Cheung EV; Sperling JW; Cofield RH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Aug; 89(8):1777-83. PubMed ID: 17671018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What can be learned from an analysis of 215 glenoid component failures?
Hsu JE; Hackett DJ; Vo KV; Matsen FA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Mar; 27(3):478-486. PubMed ID: 29310914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing a second-generation uncemented trabecular metal-backed vs. cemented polyethylene glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty: 5-year results.
Chin PYK; Regan W; Plausinis D; Zarzour Z; Leung F; Johnston K; Lim B; Sasyniuk T
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 May; 33(5):1004-1016. PubMed ID: 38286183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
