These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19297690)

  • 1. An evaluation framework for statistical tests on microarray data.
    Dondrup M; Hüser AT; Mertens D; Goesmann A
    J Biotechnol; 2009 Mar; 140(1-2):18-26. PubMed ID: 19297690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rank-invariant resampling based estimation of false discovery rate for analysis of small sample microarray data.
    Jain N; Cho H; O'Connell M; Lee JK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():187. PubMed ID: 16042779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spearman's footrule as a measure of cDNA microarray reproducibility.
    Kim BS; Rha SY; Cho GB; Chung HC
    Genomics; 2004 Aug; 84(2):441-8. PubMed ID: 15234007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rosetta error model for gene expression analysis.
    Weng L; Dai H; Zhan Y; He Y; Stepaniants SB; Bassett DE
    Bioinformatics; 2006 May; 22(9):1111-21. PubMed ID: 16522673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing three methods for variance estimation with duplicated high density oligonucleotide arrays.
    Huang X; Pan W
    Funct Integr Genomics; 2002 Aug; 2(3):126-33. PubMed ID: 12185460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating concentration estimation errors in ELISA microarray experiments.
    Daly DS; White AM; Varnum SM; Anderson KK; Zangar RC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 6():17. PubMed ID: 15673468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Large scale real-time PCR validation on gene expression measurements from two commercial long-oligonucleotide microarrays.
    Wang Y; Barbacioru C; Hyland F; Xiao W; Hunkapiller KL; Blake J; Chan F; Gonzalez C; Zhang L; Samaha RR
    BMC Genomics; 2006 Mar; 7():59. PubMed ID: 16551369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robust gene selection methods using weighting schemes for microarray data analysis.
    Kang S; Song J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Sep; 18(1):389. PubMed ID: 28865426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of normalization on the correlation structure of microarray data.
    Qiu X; Brooks AI; Klebanov L; Yakovlev N
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 6():120. PubMed ID: 15904488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. General power and sample size calculations for high-dimensional genomic data.
    van Iterson M; van de Wiel MA; Boer JM; de Menezes RX
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Aug; 12(4):449-67. PubMed ID: 23934609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula.
    Springate SD
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21447784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new method for class prediction based on signed-rank algorithms applied to Affymetrix microarray experiments.
    Rème T; Hose D; De Vos J; Vassal A; Poulain PO; Pantesco V; Goldschmidt H; Klein B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 9():16. PubMed ID: 18190711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving the statistical detection of regulated genes from microarray data using intensity-based variance estimation.
    Comander J; Natarajan S; Gimbrone MA; García-Cardeña G
    BMC Genomics; 2004 Feb; 5(1):17. PubMed ID: 15113402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noninferiority tests based on concordance correlation coefficient for assessment of the agreement for gene expression data from microarray experiments.
    Liao CT; Lin CY; Liu JP
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):309-27. PubMed ID: 17365226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of High-Level Microarray Analysis Methods in the Context of Result Consistency.
    Chrominski K; Tkacz M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128845. PubMed ID: 26057385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust Significance Analysis of Microarrays by Minimum
    Shahjaman M; Kumar N; Mollah MMH; Ahmed MS; Ara Begum A; Shahinul Islam SM; Mollah MNH
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():5310198. PubMed ID: 28819626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EVE (external variance estimation) increases statistical power for detecting differentially expressed genes.
    Wille A; Gruissem W; Bühlmann P; Hennig L
    Plant J; 2007 Nov; 52(3):561-9. PubMed ID: 17680783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microarray data analysis: a hierarchical T-test to handle heteroscedasticity.
    de Menezes RX; Boer JM; van Houwelingen HC
    Appl Bioinformatics; 2004; 3(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 15702953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficient two-sample designs for microarray experiments with biological replications.
    Landgrebe J; Bretz F; Brunner E
    In Silico Biol; 2004; 4(4):461-70. PubMed ID: 15506995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of analysis-of-variance-based methods to quantify the random variations of observers in medical imaging measurements: guidelines to the investigator.
    Zeggelink WF; Hart AA; Gilhuijs KG
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):1996-2007. PubMed ID: 15305452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.