These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19297867)
1. Naked regulators: moral pluralism, deliberative democracy and authoritative regulation of human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research. Parker M J Law Med; 2009 Feb; 16(4):580-9. PubMed ID: 19297867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Lockhart Committee: developing policy through commitment to moral values, community and democratic processes. Skene L; Kerridge I; Marshall B; McCombe P; Schofield P J Law Med; 2008 Aug; 16(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 18807801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Lockhart Review: where now for Australia? Cooper D J Law Med; 2006 Aug; 14(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 16937780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Moral regulation and the presumption of guilt in Health Canada's medical cannabis policy and practice. Lucas P Int J Drug Policy; 2009 Jul; 20(4):296-303. PubMed ID: 19124233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Human embryonic stem cell research: an Australian perspective. Sinclair AH; Schofield PR Cell; 2007 Jan; 128(2):221-3. PubMed ID: 17254957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Therapeutic cloning in Australia: one small stem from man, one giant leap for mankind. Nemes I J Law Med; 2008 Aug; 16(1):139-60. PubMed ID: 18807802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing public discourses in stem cell policy debates. Lysaght T J Law Med; 2007 May; 14(4):575-82. PubMed ID: 17571787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The once and future debate on human embryonic stem cell research. Latham SR Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2009; 9 Suppl():483-94. PubMed ID: 19757716 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Deliberative Democracy and stem cell research in New York State: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Sulmasy DP Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2009 Mar; 19(1):63-78. PubMed ID: 19306697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deliberating or dithering? Ireland and human embryonic stem cell research. Gough F Eur J Health Law; 2013 Apr; 20(2):145-65. PubMed ID: 23772461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Federal funding and the regulation of embryonic stem cell research: the Pontius Pilate maneuver. Levine RJ Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2009; 9 Suppl():552-64. PubMed ID: 19757720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. International trends in bioethics for embryonic stem cell research. Kiatpongsan S; Pruksananonda K J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Sep; 89(9):1542-4. PubMed ID: 17100398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Authoritative regulation and the stem cell debate. Capps B Bioethics; 2008 Jan; 22(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 18154588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Research ethics. The NIH draft guidelines on human stem cell research. Majumder MA; Cohen CB Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5935):1648-9. PubMed ID: 19556488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetic screening: programs, principles, and research--thirty years later. Reviewing the recommendations of the Committee for the Study of Inborn Errors of Metabolism (SIEM). Simopoulos AP; Public Health Genomics; 2009; 12(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 19039254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]