230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19298575)
1. Canal transportation and centring ability of RaCe rotary instruments.
Pasternak-Júnior B; Sousa-Neto MD; Silva RG
Int Endod J; 2009 Jun; 42(6):499-506. PubMed ID: 19298575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of root canal transportation induced by three rotary systems with noncutting tips using computed tomography.
Özer SY
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Feb; 111(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 21167759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computed tomography evaluation of rotary systems on the root canal transportation and centering ability.
Pagliosa A; Sousa-Neto MD; Versiani MA; Raucci-Neto W; Silva-Sousa YT; Alfredo E
Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Centring ability and apical transportation after overinstrumentation with ProTaper Universal and ProFile Vortex instruments.
González Sánchez JA; Duran-Sindreu F; de Noé S; Mercadé M; Roig M
Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):542-51. PubMed ID: 22264187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Canal Transportation, Centering Ratio by Cone-beam Computed Tomography after Preparation with Different File Systems.
Uzunoglu E; Turker SA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 May; 16(5):360-5. PubMed ID: 26162254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Apical fit of initial K-files in maxillary molars assessed by micro-computed tomography.
Paqué F; Zehnder M; Marending M
Int Endod J; 2010 Apr; 43(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 20487453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography.
Paqué F; Ganahl D; Peters OA
J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1056-9. PubMed ID: 19567334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microcomputed tomographic evaluation of canal transportation and centring ability of ProTaper Next and Twisted File Adaptive systems.
Silva EJNL; Pacheco PT; Pires F; Belladonna FG; De-Deus G
Int Endod J; 2017 Jul; 50(7):694-699. PubMed ID: 27256247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Canal Transportation and Centring Ability of Reciproc and Reciproc Blue With or Without Use of Glide Path Instruments: A CBCT Study.
Hage W; Zogheib C; Bukiet F; Sfeir G; Khalil I; Gergi R; Naaman A
Eur Endod J; 2020; 5(2):118-122. PubMed ID: 32766521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in apical transportation.
Javaheri HH; Javaheri GH
J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):284-6. PubMed ID: 17320715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of the apical third of curved roots after mechanical preparation with different automated systems.
Oliveira CA; Meurer MI; Pascoalato C; Silva SR
Braz Dent J; 2009; 20(5):376-81. PubMed ID: 20126905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Apical transportation: two assessment methods.
López FU; Travessas JA; Fachin E; Fontanella V; Grecca F
Aust Endod J; 2009 Aug; 35(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 19703081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Initial apical fit of K-files versus LightSpeed LSX instruments assessed by micro-computed tomography.
Marending M; Schicht OO; Paqué F
Int Endod J; 2012 Feb; 45(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 21992481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing canal transportation and centering ability of endosequence and vortex rotary files by using micro-computed tomography.
Yamamura B; Cox TC; Heddaya B; Flake NM; Johnson JD; Paranjpe A
J Endod; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1121-5. PubMed ID: 22794219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of two single rotary glide path systems.
van der Vyver PJ; Paleker F; Vorster M; de Wet FA
Int Endod J; 2019 Mar; 52(3):352-358. PubMed ID: 30132925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of apical root canal preparation using three instrumentation techniques.
Moore J; Fitz-Walter P; Parashos P
Int Endod J; 2009 Dec; 42(12):1057-64. PubMed ID: 19912375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of RaCe instrumentation system in curved root canals: a comprehensive analysis by three study methods.
Leonardi DP; Sydney GB; Tanomaru MF; Baratto-Filho F; Baratto SS; Cerri PS
Braz Dent J; 2013; 24(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 23969911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of apical transportation and centring ability of five thermally treated NiTi rotary systems.
Pinheiro SR; Alcalde MP; Vivacqua-Gomes N; Bramante CM; Vivan RR; Duarte MAH; Vasconcelos BC
Int Endod J; 2018 Jun; 51(6):705-713. PubMed ID: 29178173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
