These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19299154)

  • 1. Regulatory implications of a linear non-threshold (LNT) dose-based risks.
    Aleta CR
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009; 67(7-8):1290-8. PubMed ID: 19299154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Update on linear non-threshold dose-response model and implications for diagnostic radiology procedures.
    Preston RJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 18849687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cancer and non-cancer effects in Japanese atomic bomb survivors.
    Little MP
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Jun; 29(2A):A43-59. PubMed ID: 19454804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. LNT--an apparent rather than a real controversy?
    Charles MW
    J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 16926475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low-dose radiation risk extrapolation fallacy associated with the linear-no-threshold model.
    Scott BR
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 27(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 18480143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does scientific evidence support a change from the LNT model for low-dose radiation risk extrapolation?
    Averbeck D
    Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):493-504. PubMed ID: 19820459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Diagnostic radiation and the risk of cancer].
    Kai M
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2005 Sep; 32(9):1229-34. PubMed ID: 16184914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radar commentary: Use of linear no-threshold hypothesis in radiation protection regulation in the United States.
    Siegel JA; Stabin MG
    Health Phys; 2012 Jan; 102(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 22134084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An analysis of various aspects of atomic bomb dose estimation at RERF using data on acute radiation symptoms.
    Gilbert ES; Ohara JL
    Radiat Res; 1984 Oct; 100(1):124-38. PubMed ID: 6494426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The debate on the use of linear no threshold for assessing the effects of low doses.
    Tubiana M; Aurengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
    J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 16926474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental derivation of relative biological effectiveness of A-bomb neutrons in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and implications for risk assessment.
    Sasaki MS; Nomura T; Ejima Y; Utsumi H; Endo S; Saito I; Itoh T; Hoshi M
    Radiat Res; 2008 Jul; 170(1):101-17. PubMed ID: 18582156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low-dose extrapolation of radiation health risks: some implications of uncertainty for radiation protection at low doses.
    Land CE
    Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):407-15. PubMed ID: 19820450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Review of relative biological effectiveness dependence on linear energy transfer for low-LET radiations.
    Hunter N; Muirhead CR
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Mar; 29(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 19225189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radioactivity in atomic-bomb samples from exposure to environmental neutrons.
    Endo S; Shizuma K; Tanaka K; Ishikawa M; Rühm W; Egbert SD; Hoshi M
    Health Phys; 2007 Dec; 93(6):689-95. PubMed ID: 17993849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cataract in atomic bomb survivors based on a threshold model and the occurrence of severe epilation.
    Otake M; Neriishi K; Schull WJ
    Radiat Res; 1996 Sep; 146(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 8752314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiation hormesis--a remedy for fear.
    Jaworowski Z
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 29(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 20332170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Leukaemia following childhood radiation exposure in the Japanese atomic bomb survivors and in medically exposed groups.
    Little MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(2):156-65. PubMed ID: 18936088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Economic and policy considerations drive the LNT debate.
    Mossman KL
    Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):245; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 18220464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incidence of dementia among atomic-bomb survivors--Radiation Effects Research Foundation Adult Health Study.
    Yamada M; Kasagi F; Mimori Y; Miyachi T; Ohshita T; Sasaki H
    J Neurol Sci; 2009 Jun; 281(1-2):11-4. PubMed ID: 19327783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Current risk estimates based on the A-bomb survivors data - a discussion in terms of the ICRP recommendations on the neutron weighting factor.
    Rühm W; Walsh L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):423-31. PubMed ID: 17533156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.