These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19299255)

  • 1. The role of contingency and contiguity in young and older adults' causal learning.
    Mutter SA; DeCaro MS; Plumlee LF
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2009 May; 64(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 19299255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contiguity and the outcome density bias in action-outcome contingency judgements.
    Vallée-Tourangeau F; Murphy RA; Baker AG
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Apr; 58(2):177-92. PubMed ID: 16095045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrasting cue-density effects in causal and prediction judgments.
    Vadillo MA; Musca SC; Blanco F; Matute H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 21327350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aging and integration of contingency evidence in causal judgment.
    Mutter SA; Plumlee LF
    Psychol Aging; 2009 Dec; 24(4):916-26. PubMed ID: 20025406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal contiguity and contingency judgments: a Pavlovian analogue.
    Allan LG; Tangen JM; Wood R; Shah T
    Integr Physiol Behav Sci; 2003; 38(3):214-29. PubMed ID: 15070084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning rule-described and non-rule-described categories: a comparison of children and adults.
    Minda JP; Desroches AS; Church BA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1518-33. PubMed ID: 18980411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical contingency has a different impact on preparation judgements than on causal judgements.
    De Houwer J; Vandorpe S; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):418-32. PubMed ID: 17366309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No age differences in complex memory search: older adults search as efficiently as younger adults.
    Lange EB; Verhaeghen P
    Psychol Aging; 2009 Mar; 24(1):105-15. PubMed ID: 19290742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cue interaction and judgments of causality: contributions of causal and associative processes.
    Tangen JM; Allan LG
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 15078048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of cue competition in a simple and a complex design.
    Vandorpe S; De Houwer J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):234-46. PubMed ID: 16405898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implicit memory for novel associations between pictures: effects of stimulus unitization and aging.
    Kan IP; Keane MM; Martin E; Parks-Stamm EJ; Lewis L; Verfaellie M
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jul; 39(5):778-90. PubMed ID: 21286899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cue interaction effects in causal judgement: an interpretation in terms of the evidential evaluation model.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Apr; 58(2):99-140. PubMed ID: 16095042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discrimination blocking: acquisition versus performance deficits in human contingency learning.
    Castro L; Wasserman EA
    Learn Behav; 2007 Aug; 35(3):149-62. PubMed ID: 17918420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implicit learning of predictive relationships in three-element visual sequences by young and old adults.
    Howard JH; Howard DV; Dennis NA; Kelly AJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1139-57. PubMed ID: 18763897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inferring interventional predictions from observational learning data.
    Meder B; Hagmayer Y; Waldmann MR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 18605483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 18194063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feedback-Based Learning in Aging: Contributions and Trajectories of Change in Striatal and Hippocampal Systems.
    Lighthall NR; Pearson JM; Huettel SA; Cabeza R
    J Neurosci; 2018 Sep; 38(39):8453-8462. PubMed ID: 30120208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conditional probability versus spatial contiguity in causal learning: Preschoolers use new contingency evidence to overcome prior spatial assumptions.
    Kushnir T; Gopnik A
    Dev Psychol; 2007 Jan; 43(1):186-96. PubMed ID: 17201518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The experimental task influences cue competition in human causal learning.
    Melchers KG; Ungör M; Lachnit H
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):477-83. PubMed ID: 16248733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.