BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

942 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19299814)

  • 1. Retraction notice.
    Shafer SL
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Apr; 108(4):1351. PubMed ID: 19299814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correcting the scientific record.
    Nat Chem Biol; 2008 Jul; 4(7):381. PubMed ID: 18560424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Special notice to readers and authors on scientific misconduct.
    Miller DR
    Can J Anaesth; 2009 Jun; 56(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 19330396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tattered threads.
    Shafer SL
    Anesth Analg; 2009 May; 108(5):1361-3. PubMed ID: 19372305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Update to readers and authors on ethical and scientific misconduct: retraction of the "Boldt articles".
    Miller DR
    Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):777-9, 779-81. PubMed ID: 21800211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.
    Couzin J; Unger K
    Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirical developments in retraction.
    Redman BK; Yarandi HN; Merz JF
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Nov; 34(11):807-9. PubMed ID: 18974415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy and integrity include hearing both sides.
    Wylie DT
    Optometry; 2010 Sep; 81(9):429. PubMed ID: 20728819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Publication ethics.
    Freeman PB
    Optometry; 2010 Apr; 81(4):167-8. PubMed ID: 20346886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The science of retraction.
    Nat Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 5(12):1249. PubMed ID: 12447375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
    Steen RG
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 21081306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coping with scientific misconduct.
    Wager E
    BMJ; 2011 Oct; 343():d6586. PubMed ID: 22016451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Under suspicion.
    Nature; 2010 Apr; 464(7293):1245. PubMed ID: 20428116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
    Wager E; Barbour V; Yentis S; Kleinert S;
    Obes Rev; 2010 Jan; 11(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 20653849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shadow of doubt.
    Shafer SL
    Anesth Analg; 2011 Mar; 112(3):498-500. PubMed ID: 21296856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Science publishing: The trouble with retractions.
    Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2011 Oct; 478(7367):26-8. PubMed ID: 21979026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retractions: trends, implications, and possible further steps.
    Giglia E; Pescarmona GP
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2012 Jun; 48(2):339-43. PubMed ID: 22614895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Promoting ethical conduct in the publication of research.
    Freedman JE
    Cardiovasc Ther; 2008; 26(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 18485131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientific conduct... and misconduct.
    Genter MB; Brock WJ; Mattes WB
    Toxicol Sci; 2015 Mar; 144(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 25901331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anaesthetics journals retract further articles after ethics approval is found lacking.
    Torjesen I
    BMJ; 2012 Mar; 344():e2019. PubMed ID: 22415958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 48.