These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19300252)

  • 1. The science and art of quality in obstetric ultrasound.
    Salomon LJ; Ville Y
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 21(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 19300252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Quality of nuchal transluccency measurements: an exploratory study into their performance and evaluation].
    van den Berg M; Kleinveld JH; Sander MJ; van Vugt JM; Timmermans DR
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Jul; 149(30):1691-6. PubMed ID: 16104116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Education and quality review for nuchal translucency ultrasound.
    D'Alton ME; Cleary-Goldman J
    Semin Perinatol; 2005 Dec; 29(6):380-5. PubMed ID: 16533651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality control of an image-scoring method for nuchal translucency ultrasonography.
    Fries N; Althuser M; Fontanges M; Talmant C; Jouk PS; Tindel M; Duyme M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 196(3):272.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17346552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Quality control of prenatal ultrasound. A role for biometry].
    Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Ville Y
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Sep; 34(9):683-91. PubMed ID: 16959525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of prenatal ultrasound for the detection of fetal aneuploidy.
    Holmgren C; Lacoursiere DY
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 51(1):48-61. PubMed ID: 18303499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A proposed protocol for obstetrical ultrasound examination].
    Novakov A; Vejnović T; Stojić S; Belopavlović Z
    Med Pregl; 1999; 52(9-10):351-6. PubMed ID: 10624383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The CUSUM test applied in prospective nuchal translucency quality review.
    Sabrià J; Barceló-Vidal C; Arigita M; Jimenez JM; Puerto B; Borrell A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 May; 37(5):582-7. PubMed ID: 21520314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. First trimester ultrasonography in screening and detection of fetal anomalies.
    Sonek J
    Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2007 Feb; 145C(1):45-61. PubMed ID: 17304542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Continuous independent quality control for fetal nuchal translucency measurements provided by the cumulative summation technique.
    Balsyte D; Schäffer L; Burkhardt T; Wisser J; Krafft A; Kurmanavicius J
    Ultraschall Med; 2011 Dec; 32 Suppl 2():E141-6. PubMed ID: 21877321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. First trimester Down syndrome screening: public health implications.
    Fuchs KM; Peipert JF
    Semin Perinatol; 2005 Aug; 29(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 16104680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. First-trimester screening for fetal triploidy at 11 to 14 weeks: a role for fetal biometry.
    Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Nizard J; Ville Y
    Prenat Diagn; 2005 Jun; 25(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 15966039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prenatal testing for aneuploidy in New Zealand: time for action.
    Stone P
    N Z Med J; 2005 Jun; 118(1217):U1545. PubMed ID: 15980916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A score-based method for quality control of fetal images at routine second-trimester ultrasound examination.
    Salomon LJ; Winer N; Bernard JP; Ville Y
    Prenat Diagn; 2008 Sep; 28(9):822-7. PubMed ID: 18646244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasound simulators: experience with the SonoTrainer and comparative review of other training systems.
    Maul H; Scharf A; Baier P; Wüstemann M; Günter HH; Gebauer G; Sohn C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 24(5):581-5. PubMed ID: 15386609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nuchal translucency quality monitoring holes in the safety net.
    Wax JR; Pinette MG
    J Ultrasound Med; 2008 Nov; 27(11):1539-42. PubMed ID: 18946091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound.
    Lopez EI
    Neonatal Intensive Care; 1990; 3(6):12-9, 42-4. PubMed ID: 10148934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality management of nuchal translucency ultrasound measurement in Australia.
    Nisbet D; Robertson A; Mannil B; Pincham V; Mclennan A
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Feb; 59(1):54-58. PubMed ID: 29469171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnosis of IUGR: traditional biometry.
    Platz E; Newman R
    Semin Perinatol; 2008 Jun; 32(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 18482612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nuchal translucency measurement: are qualitative and quantitative quality control processes related?
    Hermann M; Fries N; Mangione R; Boukobza P; Ville Y; Salomon LJ
    Prenat Diagn; 2013 Aug; 33(8):770-4. PubMed ID: 23613188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.