These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19300252)

  • 21. Semi-automated measurement of nuchal translucency thickness: blasphemy or oblation to quality?
    Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Oct; 36(4):400-3. PubMed ID: 20872935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Recent advances in prenatal diagnostics].
    Lapaire O; Holzgreve W; Miny P; Hösli I; Hahn S; Tercanli S
    Ther Umsch; 2006 Nov; 63(11):683-91. PubMed ID: 17075782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quality of nuchal translucency measurements in multifetal pregnancies.
    Zohav E; Segal O; Rabinson J; Meltcer S; Anteby EY; Orvieto R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Oct; 19(10):663-6. PubMed ID: 17118742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Molecular biology usefulness for rapid diagnosis of Down's syndrome and common aneuploidies].
    Fauret AL; Bilan F; Patri S; Couet D; Marechaud M; Pierre F; Gilbert-Dussardier B; Kitzis A
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009; 37(7-8):611-9. PubMed ID: 19574080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prenatal genetic screening.
    Burgin KB
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2008; 53(4):391-2. PubMed ID: 18586193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The utility of detailed first trimester ultrasound examination in abnormal fetal nuchal translucency.
    Bronshtein M; Zimmer EZ; Blazer S
    Prenat Diagn; 2008 Nov; 28(11):1037-41. PubMed ID: 18925580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Optimal caliper placement: manual vs automated methods.
    Yazdi B; Zanker P; Wanger P; Sonek J; Pintoffl K; Hoopmann M; Kagan KO
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 43(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 23671025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Standardisation and quality control of ultrasound measurements taken in the INTERGROWTH-21st Project.
    Sarris I; Ioannou C; Ohuma EO; Altman DG; Hoch L; Cosgrove C; Fathima S; Salomon LJ; Papageorghiou AT;
    BJOG; 2013 Sep; 120 Suppl 2():33-7, v. PubMed ID: 23841486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sonologist's characteristics related to a higher quality in fetal nuchal translucency measured in primary antenatal care centers.
    Torrent A; Manrique G; Gómez-Castelló T; Baldrich E; Cahuana M; Manresa JM; Borrell A
    Prenat Diagn; 2019 Sep; 39(10):934-939. PubMed ID: 31237971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester combined screening followed by second trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected population].
    Rozenberg P; Bussières L; Chevret S; Bernard JP; Malagrida L; Cuckle H; Chabry C; Durand-Zaleski I; Bidat L; Lacroix I; Moulis M; Roger M; Jacquemot MC; Bault JP; Boukobza P; Boccara P; Vialat F; Giudicelli Y; Ville Y
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Apr; 35(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 17350315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. First-trimester screening for chromosomal abnormalities.
    Nicolaides KH
    Semin Perinatol; 2005 Aug; 29(4):190-4. PubMed ID: 16104667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Trisomy 21, after a half century].
    Nau JY
    Rev Med Suisse; 2009 Feb; 5(190):380. PubMed ID: 19264068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Nuchal translucency measurements for first-trimester screening: the 'price' of inaccuracy.
    Evans MI; Van Decruyes H; Nicolaides KH
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2007; 22(6):401-4. PubMed ID: 17652924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Re: Feasibility and reproducibility of an image-scoring method for quality control of fetal biometry in the second trimester.
    Dudley N
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):352. PubMed ID: 16909408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation and comparison of current fetal ultrasound image segmentation methods for biometric measurements: a grand challenge.
    Rueda S; Fathima S; Knight CL; Yaqub M; Papageorghiou AT; Rahmatullah B; Foi A; Maggioni M; Pepe A; Tohka J; Stebbing RV; McManigle JE; Ciurte A; Bresson X; Cuadra MB; Sun C; Ponomarev GV; Gelfand MS; Kazanov MD; Wang CW; Chen HC; Peng CW; Hung CM; Noble JA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Apr; 33(4):797-813. PubMed ID: 23934664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The concept of sonographic organ diagnosis--a contribution to quality assurance].
    Meudt R; Buser C; Bösch A
    Ultraschall Med; 1986 Apr; 7(2):54-8. PubMed ID: 3520816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quality assurance in obstetric ultrasound.
    Dudley NJ; Potter R
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Oct; 66(790):865-70. PubMed ID: 8220967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Telemedicine in obstetrics.
    Odibo IN; Wendel PJ; Magann EF
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Sep; 56(3):422-33. PubMed ID: 23903374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. RETIRED: Fetal soft markers in obstetric ultrasound.
    Van den Hof MC; Wilson RD; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2005 Jun; 27(6):592-636. PubMed ID: 16100637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Doppler in obstetrics: evidence from randomized trials.
    Stampalija T; Alfirevic Z; Gyte G
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Dec; 36(6):779-80. PubMed ID: 21105179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.