81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19301798)
1. Anatomical graft passage in transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bioabsorbable tibial cross pin fixation.
Ahn JH; Lee YS; Chang MJ; Kum DH; Kim YH
Orthopedics; 2009 Feb; 32(2):96. PubMed ID: 19301798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of cross-pin versus interference screw tibial fixation using a soft-tissue graft during transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Lee YS; Wang JH; Bae JH; Lim HC; Park JH; Ahn JH; Bae TS; Lim BO
Arthroscopy; 2009 Sep; 25(9):989-95. PubMed ID: 19732637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tibial fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone and semitendinosus-gracilis autografts: a comparison between bioabsorbable screws and bioabsorbable cross-pin fixation.
Volpi P; Marinoni L; Bait C; Galli M; de Girolamo L
Am J Sports Med; 2009 Apr; 37(4):808-12. PubMed ID: 19218557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Soft-tissue graft fixation in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation of the effect of tibial insertion site on joint kinematics and in situ forces using a robotic/UFS testing system.
Zantop T; Lenschow S; Lemburg T; Weimann A; Petersen W
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Nov; 124(9):614-20. PubMed ID: 15372279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with preservation of remnant bundle using hamstring autograft: technical note.
Ahn JH; Lee YS; Ha HC
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Aug; 129(8):1011-5. PubMed ID: 18299859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical comparison of anteromedial versus anterolateral tibial tunnel direction for transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 2 to 8 years' follow-up.
Kim SJ; Chang JH; Kang YH; Song DH; Park KY
Am J Sports Med; 2009 Apr; 37(4):693-8. PubMed ID: 19336619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transtibial and tibial inlay double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Surgical technique using a bifid bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft.
Sekiya JK; Kurtz CA; Carr DR
Arthroscopy; 2004 Dec; 20(10):1095-100. PubMed ID: 15592242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of tibial graft fixation between simulated arthroscopic and open inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Campbell RB; Torrie A; Hecker A; Sekiya JK
Am J Sports Med; 2007 Oct; 35(10):1731-8. PubMed ID: 17554103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A proposal for a new tibial guide system for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Abdalla RJ; Pacagnan AV; Loyola HA; Cohen M; Camanho GL; Forgas A
Arthroscopy; 2007 Jul; 23(7):793.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17637420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transtibial tubercle fixation without hardware for anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A new technique.
Pasque CB; de la Garza S
Arthroscopy; 2004 Jul; 20 Suppl 2():164-70. PubMed ID: 15243453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament tibial inlay reconstruction.
Kim SJ; Choi CH; Kim HS
Arthroscopy; 2004 Jul; 20 Suppl 2():149-54. PubMed ID: 15243450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical evaluation of bioabsorbable versus metallic screws for posterior cruciate ligament inlay graft fixation: a comparative study.
Gupta A; Lattermann C; Busam M; Riff A; Bach BR; Wang VM
Am J Sports Med; 2009 Apr; 37(4):748-53. PubMed ID: 19168806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of initial fixation properties of sutured and nonsutured soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament grafts with femoral cross-pin fixation.
Dargel J; Schmidt-Wiethoff R; Heck M; Brüggemann GP; Koebke J
Arthroscopy; 2008 Jan; 24(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 18182209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bioabsorbable cross-pin femoral fixation: a technical note.
Choi NH; Son KM; Victoroff BN
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2008 May; 16(5):476-8. PubMed ID: 18278480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An accessory portal for posterior cruciate ligament tibial insertion visualization.
Bach BR; Aadalen KJ; Mazzocca AD
Arthroscopy; 2004 Jul; 20 Suppl 2():155-8. PubMed ID: 15243451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament augmentation using an autogenous hamstring tendon graft and the posterior-posterior triangulation technique.
Surendran S; Choi NY; Yoon KJ; Han CW
Arthroscopy; 2007 Apr; 23(4):444.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17418343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The clinical anatomical research of the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament and the tibial tunnel position in double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].
Liu P; Ao YF
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 46(14):1080-4. PubMed ID: 19094536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A biomechanical comparison of tibial back side fixation between suspensory and expansion mechanisms in trans-tibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Lee YS; Han SH; Kim JH
Knee; 2012 Jan; 19(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 21232962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new technique for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Foukas AF; Learmonth DJ; Phillips JE; Pugh C
Arthroscopy; 2002 Jan; 18(1):E3. PubMed ID: 11774156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel technique of graft passage in arthroscopically assisted posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Miller D; Roach R
Arthroscopy; 2007 Aug; 23(8):908.e1-2. PubMed ID: 17681218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
